Soil preparation systems and type of fertilization as affecting physical attributes of cohesive soil under eucalyptus in Northeastern Brazil

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy. Pub Date : 2022-11-22 DOI:10.4025/actasciagron.v45i1.58010
Vinicius de Jesus Nunes, E. D. S. Leite, J. Maria de Lima, R. S. Barbosa, Davi Ney Santos, F. P. M. Dias, J. C. A. Nóbrega
{"title":"Soil preparation systems and type of fertilization as affecting physical attributes of cohesive soil under eucalyptus in Northeastern Brazil","authors":"Vinicius de Jesus Nunes, E. D. S. Leite, J. Maria de Lima, R. S. Barbosa, Davi Ney Santos, F. P. M. Dias, J. C. A. Nóbrega","doi":"10.4025/actasciagron.v45i1.58010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cohesive Oxisols are widely used for cultivating eucalyptus in the Coastal Tablelands of the northeastern region of Brazil. However, mechanization and plant cultivation in these soils are difficult because of their cohesive layers. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify better combinations between tillage systems and types of fertilization to improve the physical attributes of cohesive soil, with the aim of improving eucalyptus growth. The experimental design was completely randomized in a 4 × 2 factorial scheme (soil preparation × fertilization). The tillage systems tested were: i) conventional tillage (CT) - one plowing combined with two harrowings, ii) minimum tillage (MT) - subsoiling down until 0.57 m depths in the planting line, iii) no-tillage type 1 (NT1) - planting in 0.3 m-deep pits, and iv) no-tillage type 2 (NT2) - planting in 0.6 m-deep pits. The types of fertilization tested were mineral (MF) and organic fertilization (OF). The diameter of the soil aggregates was reduced after being subjected to any combination of cohesive soils. Furthermore, OF provided the best levels of plant-available water, attenuating the adverse conditions of the cohesive layer. MT, NT1, and NT2 improved the soil physical attributes when compared to CT. Therefore, the combination of either NT1 or NT2 with OF, followed by the combination of either NT1 or NT2 with MF, was determined to be the best way to cultivate eucalyptus on cohesive soils.","PeriodicalId":56373,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy.","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy.","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v45i1.58010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cohesive Oxisols are widely used for cultivating eucalyptus in the Coastal Tablelands of the northeastern region of Brazil. However, mechanization and plant cultivation in these soils are difficult because of their cohesive layers. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify better combinations between tillage systems and types of fertilization to improve the physical attributes of cohesive soil, with the aim of improving eucalyptus growth. The experimental design was completely randomized in a 4 × 2 factorial scheme (soil preparation × fertilization). The tillage systems tested were: i) conventional tillage (CT) - one plowing combined with two harrowings, ii) minimum tillage (MT) - subsoiling down until 0.57 m depths in the planting line, iii) no-tillage type 1 (NT1) - planting in 0.3 m-deep pits, and iv) no-tillage type 2 (NT2) - planting in 0.6 m-deep pits. The types of fertilization tested were mineral (MF) and organic fertilization (OF). The diameter of the soil aggregates was reduced after being subjected to any combination of cohesive soils. Furthermore, OF provided the best levels of plant-available water, attenuating the adverse conditions of the cohesive layer. MT, NT1, and NT2 improved the soil physical attributes when compared to CT. Therefore, the combination of either NT1 or NT2 with OF, followed by the combination of either NT1 or NT2 with MF, was determined to be the best way to cultivate eucalyptus on cohesive soils.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西东北部桉树下土壤黏性土壤物理特性的整地制度和施肥类型
粘结性土壤被广泛用于巴西东北部沿海塬地的桉树种植。然而,由于这些土壤的粘性层,机械化和植物种植是困难的。因此,本研究的目的是确定耕作制度和施肥类型之间的更好组合,以改善粘性土壤的物理属性,以促进桉树的生长。试验设计采用4 × 2因子(土壤准备×施肥)完全随机化设计。测试的耕作系统为:i)常规耕作(CT) -一次翻耕结合两次耙耙,ii)最小耕作(MT) -在种植线上深0.57 m深的土壤中播种,iii)免耕类型1 (NT1) -在0.3 m深的坑中种植,iv)免耕类型2 (NT2) -在0.6 m深的坑中种植。试验施肥类型为无机肥(MF)和有机肥(of)。土壤团聚体的直径在受到粘性土的任何组合后都有所减小。此外,OF提供了最佳水平的植物有效水分,减弱了粘结层的不利条件。与CT相比,MT、NT1和NT2改善了土壤的物理属性。因此,NT1或NT2与of的组合,其次是NT1或NT2与MF的组合,是在粘性土壤上种植桉树的最佳方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy.
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy. Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original articles in all areas of Agronomy, including soil sciences, agricultural entomology, soil fertility and manuring, soil physics, physiology of cultivated plants, phytopathology, phyto-health, phytotechny, genesis, morphology and soil classification, management and conservation of soil, integrated management of plant pests, vegetal improvement, agricultural microbiology, agricultural parasitology, production and processing of seeds.
期刊最新文献
A novel fuzzy approach to identify the phenotypic adaptability of common bean lines Genetic improvement of black oats: a scientometric review New evidence for in vitro conservation of nodal segments of the passion fruit ‘UENF Rio Dourado’ (Passiflora edulis Sims) Morphophysiological changes in black pepper under different water supplies Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PKM16 acts as an antagonist of white mold and an inducer of defense enzymes in tomato plants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1