Desarrollo y validación de un cuestionario específico de evaluación de la satisfacción del paciente diabético con glucómetros

Cristóbal Morales , Florentino Carral , Martín López de la Torre , Juan Carlos Huerga , Francisco-Javier Hurtado , Irene Ayats
{"title":"Desarrollo y validación de un cuestionario específico de evaluación de la satisfacción del paciente diabético con glucómetros","authors":"Cristóbal Morales ,&nbsp;Florentino Carral ,&nbsp;Martín López de la Torre ,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Huerga ,&nbsp;Francisco-Javier Hurtado ,&nbsp;Irene Ayats","doi":"10.1016/j.avdiab.2013.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of the study was to develop a specific questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with the use of glucometers, and to evaluate their psychometric properties (feasibility, reliability and validity).</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>(i) An initial 53 item bank was constructed from a systematic review of literature. A panel composed of 6 experts and 50 patients concluded a 25 item version of the questionnaire (dimensions: Satisfaction, inconveniences, added value and appearance). (ii) In order to evaluate the psychometric properties, an epidemiological multi-centred, cross-sectional and 2 month long study was designed, for which 283 patients 18 years or older who were suffering from DM (type 1 and 2) and using a portable glucometer were recruited. Responses to the questionnaire that was the purpose of the study were gathered, together with complementary variables in a single visit. To evaluate test-retest reliability, 51 patients responded again 15 days after initial visit.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.88). Moreover, it showed a positive and statistically significant correlation with patient overall satisfaction (SAT-Q), and with patient treatment-satisfaction (DTSQs<sup>©</sup>) questionnaires. Statistically significant differences were found in SATIGLU total score depending on the type of DM, in favour of type 1 DM patients (z<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->6.69; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.000), and glycated haemoglobin favouring patients who observe a good control of their disease, HbA1c<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->7 (z<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->–3.13; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.002).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The SATIGLU Questionnaire showed adequate psychometric properties as an evaluation tool of patient satisfaction with the use of glucometers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100152,"journal":{"name":"Avances en Diabetología","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.avdiab.2013.09.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avances en Diabetología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134323013000963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the study was to develop a specific questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with the use of glucometers, and to evaluate their psychometric properties (feasibility, reliability and validity).

Material and methods

(i) An initial 53 item bank was constructed from a systematic review of literature. A panel composed of 6 experts and 50 patients concluded a 25 item version of the questionnaire (dimensions: Satisfaction, inconveniences, added value and appearance). (ii) In order to evaluate the psychometric properties, an epidemiological multi-centred, cross-sectional and 2 month long study was designed, for which 283 patients 18 years or older who were suffering from DM (type 1 and 2) and using a portable glucometer were recruited. Responses to the questionnaire that was the purpose of the study were gathered, together with complementary variables in a single visit. To evaluate test-retest reliability, 51 patients responded again 15 days after initial visit.

Results

There was high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = .88). Moreover, it showed a positive and statistically significant correlation with patient overall satisfaction (SAT-Q), and with patient treatment-satisfaction (DTSQs©) questionnaires. Statistically significant differences were found in SATIGLU total score depending on the type of DM, in favour of type 1 DM patients (z = 6.69; P = .000), and glycated haemoglobin favouring patients who observe a good control of their disease, HbA1c < 7 (z = –3.13; P = .002).

Conclusion

The SATIGLU Questionnaire showed adequate psychometric properties as an evaluation tool of patient satisfaction with the use of glucometers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和验证一份特定的问卷,以评估糖尿病患者对血糖仪的满意度
目的本研究的目的是制定一份特定的问卷来评估患者对血糖仪使用的满意度,并评估其心理测量特性(可行性、信度和效度)。材料和方法(i)通过系统地查阅文献,初步建立了53个物项库。由6名专家和50名患者组成的小组完成了一份25个项目的问卷(维度:满意度、不便、附加值和外观)。(ii)为了评估心理测量特性,设计了一项多中心、横断面、为期2个月的流行病学研究,招募了283名18岁及以上的糖尿病(1型和2型)患者,并使用便携式血糖仪。对问卷的回答是研究的目的,在一次访问中收集了补充变量。为了评估重测信度,51例患者在初次就诊后15天再次出现应答。结果内部一致性高(Cronbach α = 0.88)。此外,它与患者总体满意度(SAT-Q)和患者治疗满意度(DTSQs©)问卷呈正相关且有统计学意义。SATIGLU总分与DM类型的差异有统计学意义,1型DM患者得分较高(z = 6.69;P = 0.000),糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c <)有利于病情控制良好的患者;7 (z = -3.13;p = .002)。结论SATIGLU问卷具有足够的心理测量特性,可作为患者对血糖仪使用满意度的评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluación de la satisfacción del paciente diabético con la utilización del glucómetro portátil BGSTAR© mediante el cuestionario SATIGLU Escalas de cálculo del riesgo cardiovascular para pacientes con diabetes. ¿Qué son y de qué nos sirven? Reunión anual del grupo de trabajo «islotes pancreáticos» de la Sociedad Española de Diabetes Documento de consenso sobre el tratamiento con infusión subcutánea continua de insulina en el medio hospitalario Claves para avanzar hacia un rol más activo por parte del paciente con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en España
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1