The Results and Outcomes of Rectal Cancer Treatment in the Era of Adjuvant Chemoradiation

A. Izadpanah, S. Hosseini, M. Al-Qanbar, Mozhdeh Zamani, Behnam Kadkhodaei
{"title":"The Results and Outcomes of Rectal Cancer Treatment in the Era of Adjuvant Chemoradiation","authors":"A. Izadpanah, S. Hosseini, M. Al-Qanbar, Mozhdeh Zamani, Behnam Kadkhodaei","doi":"10.30476/ACRR.2019.45941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer causes many deaths worldwide and rectal cancer includes one-third of them. Surgical mesorectal excision along with preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is known as the standard treatment for rectal cancer. However, inaccurate preoperative staging is a main concern which leads to large number of patients not being treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Selection of the best treatment approach for these patients is controversial. Although significant better survival was observed is patients who received postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation compared with patients who treated with surgery alone, other studies did not find such results. Due to these contradictory results, this study was designed to further evaluate the survival outcomes in rectal cancer patients who received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy without neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: Totally 197 rectal cancer patients who received adjuvant chemoradiation were included in this study. The demographic and clinico-pathological characteristics of the patients were evaluated by statistical analysis. Results: Based on the univariate cox regression, poor disease free survival (DFS) was significantly associated with male sex and T3 stage. Poor overall survival (OS) was also associated with stage II/III, T3/T4, NI/NII, grade II/III, positive node number (> 3), perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and margin involvement. According to the multivariate cox regression, independent predictive factors for DFS were T3 andT4 stage, and for OS were also T3/ T4 stage, grade II/ III and lymphovascular invasion. Conclusions: Taken together, obtained results indicated that combined adjuvant chemoradiation contributes to improve survival outcomes in the rectal cancer patients who did not received neoadjuvant therapy.","PeriodicalId":8370,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Colorectal Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Colorectal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/ACRR.2019.45941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer causes many deaths worldwide and rectal cancer includes one-third of them. Surgical mesorectal excision along with preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is known as the standard treatment for rectal cancer. However, inaccurate preoperative staging is a main concern which leads to large number of patients not being treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Selection of the best treatment approach for these patients is controversial. Although significant better survival was observed is patients who received postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation compared with patients who treated with surgery alone, other studies did not find such results. Due to these contradictory results, this study was designed to further evaluate the survival outcomes in rectal cancer patients who received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy without neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: Totally 197 rectal cancer patients who received adjuvant chemoradiation were included in this study. The demographic and clinico-pathological characteristics of the patients were evaluated by statistical analysis. Results: Based on the univariate cox regression, poor disease free survival (DFS) was significantly associated with male sex and T3 stage. Poor overall survival (OS) was also associated with stage II/III, T3/T4, NI/NII, grade II/III, positive node number (> 3), perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and margin involvement. According to the multivariate cox regression, independent predictive factors for DFS were T3 andT4 stage, and for OS were also T3/ T4 stage, grade II/ III and lymphovascular invasion. Conclusions: Taken together, obtained results indicated that combined adjuvant chemoradiation contributes to improve survival outcomes in the rectal cancer patients who did not received neoadjuvant therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅助放化疗时代直肠癌治疗的结果与结局
背景:结直肠癌是世界范围内死亡人数最多的疾病,其中直肠癌占死亡人数的三分之一。手术直肠系膜切除和术前新辅助放化疗被称为直肠癌的标准治疗。然而,不准确的术前分期是导致大量患者不接受新辅助治疗的主要问题。为这些患者选择最佳治疗方法是有争议的。虽然术后辅助放化疗患者的生存率明显高于单纯手术治疗的患者,但其他研究并未发现这一结果。鉴于这些相互矛盾的结果,本研究旨在进一步评估接受辅助放化疗而不进行新辅助治疗的直肠癌患者的生存结果。方法:对197例接受辅助放化疗的直肠癌患者进行研究。统计分析患者的人口学特征和临床病理特征。结果:基于单因素cox回归,无病生存差(DFS)与男性性别和T3分期显著相关。较差的总生存期(OS)还与II/III期、T3/T4期、NI/NII期、II/III级、阳性淋巴结数(> 3)、神经周围浸润、淋巴血管浸润和边缘受累有关。多因素cox回归分析显示,DFS的独立预测因素为T3和T4期,OS的独立预测因素为T3/ T4期、II/ III级和淋巴血管浸润。结论:综上所述,所获得的结果表明,联合辅助放化疗有助于改善未接受新辅助治疗的直肠癌患者的生存结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role of endoplasmic reticulum metallo protease 1 on Autophagy Pathway in HCT-116 Colorectal Cancer Cell Line ORAL BACTERIA AND COLORECTAL PATHOLOGY Technique of Ghost (Khatith) Ileostomy-How I Do It? Collagenous Enteritis – An Alternative Cause of Malabsorptive Enteropathy SIMPLE ANAL FISTULA: CLINICAL CRITERIA FOR DIAGNOSIS AND LOCAL ANESTHESIA WITH CONSCIOUS SEDATION FOR SURGERY - AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1