Innovation As a Factor of Changing the Productivity of Enterprises: Measurement and Interpretation Issues

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Networks & Spatial Economics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.14530/se.2022.4.093-127
Y. Domnich
{"title":"Innovation As a Factor of Changing the Productivity of Enterprises: Measurement and Interpretation Issues","authors":"Y. Domnich","doi":"10.14530/se.2022.4.093-127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this аrticle is to present the current state of empirical research in the field of assessing the impact of innovations on enterprise productivity, detailing the problems of statistical measurement of innovations and meaningful interpretation of accumulated results. To study a sample of scientific papers devoted to the quantitative analysis of the impact of innovations on productivity, the methods of multifactorial systematization, critical analysis, content analysis and synthetic generalization were used. The problems of statistical measurement and consistent interpretation are analyzed in the context of four levels: innovation as an economic phenomenon; innovation as a factor of productivity change in the economy of a particular country; innovation as a factor of comparative economic dynamics in the global scale and innovation as a factor of industrial development in Russia. Conclusions and Relevance. In the modern economy, innovations are an independent factor of production, different from scientific research, patented inventions, material and technical base and other factors. The impact of innovations is often insignificant against the background of other factors and (or) negative. Microeconomic studies carried out on the basis of the results of surveys of enterprises are strongly limited in terms of regional, sectoral and intertemporal coverage of the economy. The dominance of the subjective approach to measuring innovation and the CDM model to assess the relationship between innovation and productivity leads to the accumulation of less informative results. The analytical potential of mainstream approaches to the problem of assessing the impact of innovations on productivity is wearing out and it will not be possible to compensate for their weaknesses without losing comparability in the near future","PeriodicalId":54733,"journal":{"name":"Networks & Spatial Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Networks & Spatial Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2022.4.093-127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this аrticle is to present the current state of empirical research in the field of assessing the impact of innovations on enterprise productivity, detailing the problems of statistical measurement of innovations and meaningful interpretation of accumulated results. To study a sample of scientific papers devoted to the quantitative analysis of the impact of innovations on productivity, the methods of multifactorial systematization, critical analysis, content analysis and synthetic generalization were used. The problems of statistical measurement and consistent interpretation are analyzed in the context of four levels: innovation as an economic phenomenon; innovation as a factor of productivity change in the economy of a particular country; innovation as a factor of comparative economic dynamics in the global scale and innovation as a factor of industrial development in Russia. Conclusions and Relevance. In the modern economy, innovations are an independent factor of production, different from scientific research, patented inventions, material and technical base and other factors. The impact of innovations is often insignificant against the background of other factors and (or) negative. Microeconomic studies carried out on the basis of the results of surveys of enterprises are strongly limited in terms of regional, sectoral and intertemporal coverage of the economy. The dominance of the subjective approach to measuring innovation and the CDM model to assess the relationship between innovation and productivity leads to the accumulation of less informative results. The analytical potential of mainstream approaches to the problem of assessing the impact of innovations on productivity is wearing out and it will not be possible to compensate for their weaknesses without losing comparability in the near future
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创新是改变企业生产力的因素:测量与解释问题
本文的目的是介绍创新对企业生产力影响评估领域的实证研究现状,详细介绍创新的统计测量问题和积累结果的有意义的解释。本文采用多因子系统化、批判性分析、内容分析和综合概括的方法,对创新对生产力影响的定量分析论文样本进行了研究。本文从四个层面分析了创新的统计测量和一致性解释问题:创新作为一种经济现象;创新作为特定国家经济生产力变化的一个因素;在全球范围内,创新是比较经济动态的一个因素,在俄罗斯,创新是工业发展的一个因素。结论和相关性。在现代经济中,创新是一种独立的生产要素,不同于科学研究、专利发明、物质技术基础等要素。在其他因素和(或)负面的背景下,创新的影响往往是微不足道的。在企业调查结果的基础上进行的微观经济研究在经济的区域、部门和跨期范围方面非常有限。衡量创新的主观方法和评估创新与生产率之间关系的CDM模型的主导地位导致了信息积累较少的结果。在评估创新对生产力的影响的问题上,主流方法的分析潜力正在耗尽,在不久的将来,不可能在不丧失可比性的情况下弥补它们的弱点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Networks & Spatial Economics
Networks & Spatial Economics 社会科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Networks and Spatial Economics (NETS) is devoted to the mathematical and numerical study of economic activities facilitated by human infrastructure, broadly defined to include technologies pertinent to information, telecommunications, the Internet, transportation, energy storage and transmission, and water resources. Because the spatial organization of infrastructure most generally takes the form of networks, the journal encourages submissions that employ a network perspective. However, non-network continuum models are also recognized as an important tradition that has provided great insight into spatial economic phenomena; consequently, the journal welcomes with equal enthusiasm submissions based on continuum models. The journal welcomes the full spectrum of high quality work in networks and spatial economics including theoretical studies, case studies and algorithmic investigations, as well as manuscripts that combine these aspects. Although not devoted exclusively to theoretical studies, the journal is "theory-friendly". That is, well thought out theoretical analyses of important network and spatial economic problems will be considered without bias even if they do not include case studies or numerical examples.
期刊最新文献
Multimarket Contact and Market Power Implications in the US Airline Industry Winner Determination with Sustainable-Flexible Considerations Under Demand Uncertainty in Transportation Service Procurement Auctions A Strongly Convergent Viscosity-Type Inertial Algorithm with Self Adaptive Stepsize for Solving Split Variational Inclusion Problems in Hilbert Spaces Spatial Optimization of Rural Settlements in a Small Watershed Based on Social Network Analysis Equilibrium Decisions for Fresh Product Supply Chain Considering Consumers’ Freshness Preference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1