Accounting talk: developing conversation analysis in accounting research

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal Pub Date : 2022-02-03 DOI:10.1108/aaaj-09-2020-4943
Max Baker, J. Andrew, John Roberts
{"title":"Accounting talk: developing conversation analysis in accounting research","authors":"Max Baker, J. Andrew, John Roberts","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-09-2020-4943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper proposes a research method for analysing talk about accounting concepts, systems and numbers. The authors argue that studying accounting talk in situ is a fruitful way to understand both the role accounting plays in the framing of relationships between individuals and the associated emotional content of these exchanges. As such, the authors argue that conversation analysis (CA) is a useful complement to interviews in qualitative research.Design/methodology/approachThe authors introduce a specific approach to CA called positioning theory, which captures the linguistic and emotional subtleties embedded within interpersonal interactions, and the way accounting impacts and mediates these relations through measuring, assessment and control. The authors draw on one particularly animated conversation about accounting in a manufacturing company. The conversation was a largely emotional and animated exchange between individuals where talk about accounting was imbued with metaphors, violence, sex and humour.FindingsWhile participants in conversations may appear to draw on similar forms of language and expression, CA allows researchers to see that the meaning of these shared expressions change based on who is saying them, whom they are saying them to and how they are saying them. Dissecting conversations as they unfold, offers a more nuanced and multifaceted understanding of accounting as central to the social fabric of organisational life.Originality/valueAs opposed to interviews, which often suffer from the rationality of hindsight (referred to as retrospective rationality), CA captures the unfolding nature of accounting talk in real-time–not upon reflection.","PeriodicalId":48311,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-09-2020-4943","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeThis paper proposes a research method for analysing talk about accounting concepts, systems and numbers. The authors argue that studying accounting talk in situ is a fruitful way to understand both the role accounting plays in the framing of relationships between individuals and the associated emotional content of these exchanges. As such, the authors argue that conversation analysis (CA) is a useful complement to interviews in qualitative research.Design/methodology/approachThe authors introduce a specific approach to CA called positioning theory, which captures the linguistic and emotional subtleties embedded within interpersonal interactions, and the way accounting impacts and mediates these relations through measuring, assessment and control. The authors draw on one particularly animated conversation about accounting in a manufacturing company. The conversation was a largely emotional and animated exchange between individuals where talk about accounting was imbued with metaphors, violence, sex and humour.FindingsWhile participants in conversations may appear to draw on similar forms of language and expression, CA allows researchers to see that the meaning of these shared expressions change based on who is saying them, whom they are saying them to and how they are saying them. Dissecting conversations as they unfold, offers a more nuanced and multifaceted understanding of accounting as central to the social fabric of organisational life.Originality/valueAs opposed to interviews, which often suffer from the rationality of hindsight (referred to as retrospective rationality), CA captures the unfolding nature of accounting talk in real-time–not upon reflection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
会计谈话:在会计研究中开展谈话分析
目的提出一种分析会计概念、系统和数字的研究方法。作者认为,在现场研究会计谈话是一种富有成效的方式,可以理解会计在个人之间关系的框架中所起的作用,以及这些交流的相关情感内容。因此,作者认为,在定性研究中,对话分析(CA)是对访谈的有益补充。作者介绍了一种特定的CA方法,称为定位理论,它捕捉了人际互动中嵌入的语言和情感的微妙之处,以及会计如何通过测量、评估和控制来影响和调解这些关系。两位作者引用了一个关于一家制造公司会计的特别生动的对话。这次谈话在很大程度上是个人之间的情感和活跃的交流,谈论会计时充满了隐喻、暴力、性和幽默。虽然对话的参与者可能会使用类似的语言和表达形式,但CA让研究人员看到,这些共同表达的含义会随着说话人、说话对象和说话方式的变化而变化。剖析对话,因为他们展开,提供了一个更细致入微和多方面的理解会计中心的组织生活的社会结构。原创性/价值与访谈不同,访谈往往受到事后理性(称为回顾性理性)的影响,CA实时捕捉会计谈话的展开本质,而不是经过反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Dedicated to the advancement of accounting knowledge, the Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal publishes high quality manuscripts concerning the interaction between accounting/auditing and their socio-economic and political environments, encouraging critical analysis of policy and practice in these areas. The journal also seeks to encourage debate about the philosophies and traditions which underpin the accounting profession, the implications of new policy alternatives and the impact of accountancy on the socio-economic and political environment.
期刊最新文献
Exploring a Soccer Society: dreams, themes and the beautiful game Reporting controversial issues in controversial industries AAAJ Literature and Insights 36.7/8 Editorial The accounting profession is undergoing a change An autistic in postgraduate accounting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1