Snooze or Snub? How the Public Reacts to Judicial Attendance at the State of the Union

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q3 Social Sciences Justice System Journal Pub Date : 2022-08-23 DOI:10.1080/0098261X.2022.2112327
Natalie C. Rogol, Matthew D. Montgomery
{"title":"Snooze or Snub? How the Public Reacts to Judicial Attendance at the State of the Union","authors":"Natalie C. Rogol, Matthew D. Montgomery","doi":"10.1080/0098261X.2022.2112327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The president’s State of the Union Address is the pinnacle agenda-setting event of the executive’s year. Generally, along with the executive’s cabinet, the entire House and Senate are present. One branch’s attendance, however, has noticeably fluctuated over time. To date, we know of no research that studies the public response to the Court’s decision to skip or attend. For this study, we develop a survey experiment to explore the impact that media coverage of justices’ decisions to stay home has on public opinion. We hypothesize participants will be willing to lower their approval of the Court and the president when justices skip the State of the Union. We also suggest that (dis)loyalty to the president should moderate opinions on a justice’s decision to stay home. Supporters of the president should show more propensity to lower their evaluation the Court when a majority of justices choose to stay home.","PeriodicalId":45509,"journal":{"name":"Justice System Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justice System Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2022.2112327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The president’s State of the Union Address is the pinnacle agenda-setting event of the executive’s year. Generally, along with the executive’s cabinet, the entire House and Senate are present. One branch’s attendance, however, has noticeably fluctuated over time. To date, we know of no research that studies the public response to the Court’s decision to skip or attend. For this study, we develop a survey experiment to explore the impact that media coverage of justices’ decisions to stay home has on public opinion. We hypothesize participants will be willing to lower their approval of the Court and the president when justices skip the State of the Union. We also suggest that (dis)loyalty to the president should moderate opinions on a justice’s decision to stay home. Supporters of the president should show more propensity to lower their evaluation the Court when a majority of justices choose to stay home.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小睡还是小睡?公众对司法人员出席国情咨文有何反应
总统的国情咨文是行政年度的最高议程设置事件。一般来说,连同行政内阁,整个众议院和参议院都出席。然而,有一家分行的出勤率随着时间的推移出现了明显的波动。到目前为止,据我们所知,还没有一项研究研究公众对法院不出席或缺席的决定的反应。在本研究中,我们开展了一项调查实验,以探索媒体对法官决定留在家中的报道对公众舆论的影响。我们假设,当法官跳过国情咨文时,参与者将愿意降低他们对法院和总统的认可。我们还建议,对总统的(不忠诚)应该缓和对法官决定留在家里的意见。当大多数大法官选择留在家中时,总统的支持者应该表现出更倾向于降低对法院的评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Justice System Journal is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes original research articles on all aspects of law, courts, court administration, judicial behavior, and the impact of all of these on public and social policy. Open as to methodological approaches, The Justice System Journal aims to use the latest in advanced social science research and analysis to bridge the gap between practicing and academic law, courts and politics communities. The Justice System Journal invites submission of original articles and research notes that are likely to be of interest to scholars and practitioners in the field of law, courts, and judicial administration, broadly defined. Articles may draw on a variety of research approaches in the social sciences. The journal does not publish articles devoted to extended analysis of legal doctrine such as a law review might publish, although short manuscripts analyzing cases or legal issues are welcome and will be considered for the Legal Notes section. The Justice System Journal was created in 1974 by the Institute for Court Management and is published under the auspices of the National Center for State Courts. The Justice System Journal features peer-reviewed research articles as well as reviews of important books in law and courts, and analytical research notes on some of the leading cases from state and federal courts. The journal periodically produces special issues that provide analysis of fundamental and timely issues on law and courts from both national and international perspectives.
期刊最新文献
State Supreme Court Responsiveness to Court Curbing: Examining the Use of Judicial Review The Effects of Jurors’ Initial Views of Jury Service on Predeliberation Preferences for Prosecution or Defense Emerging Hardball Confirmation Tactics and Public Support for the U.S. Supreme Court A War of Words Over Abortion: The Legal-Framing Contest Over the Undue Burden Standard Letter from the Editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1