Exploring reionization and high-z galaxy observables with recent multiredshift MWA upper limits on the 21-cm signal

B. Greig, C. Trott, N. Barry, S. Mutch, B. Pindor, R. Webster, J. Wyithe
{"title":"Exploring reionization and high-z galaxy observables with recent multiredshift MWA upper limits on the 21-cm signal","authors":"B. Greig, C. Trott, N. Barry, S. Mutch, B. Pindor, R. Webster, J. Wyithe","doi":"10.1093/mnras/staa3494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use the latest multi-redshift ($z=6.5-8.7$) upper limits on the 21-cm signal from the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) to explore astrophysical models which are inconsistent with the data. These upper limits are achieved using 298 h of carefully excised data over four observing seasons. To explore these upper limits in the context of reionisation astrophysics, we use 21CMMC. We then connect the disfavoured regions of parameter space to existing observational constraints on reionisation such as high-$z$ galaxy ultra-violet (UV) luminosity functions, background UV photoionisation rate, intergalactic medium (IGM) neutral fraction, the electron scattering optical depth and the soft-band X-ray emissivity. We find the vast majority of models disfavoured by the MWA limits are already inconsistent with existing observational constraints. These inconsistent models arise from two classes of models: (i) `cold' reionisation and (ii) pure matter density fluctuations (i.e. no reionisation). However, a small subsample of models are consistent implying the existing MWA limits provide unique information in disfavouring models of reionisation, albeit extremely weakly. We also provide the first limits on the soft-band X-ray emissivity from galaxies at high redshifts, finding $1\\sigma$ lower limits of $\\epsilon_{{\\rm X},0.5-2~{\\rm keV}}\\gtrsim10^{34.5}$ erg s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-3}$. Finally, we recover 95 per cent disfavoured limits on the IGM spin temperature of $\\bar{T}_{\\rm S}\\lesssim$ 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.8, 2.1, 2.4 K at $z=6.5, 6.8, 7.1, 7.8, 8.2, 8.7$. With this we infer the IGM must have undergone, at the very least, a small amount of X-ray heating. Note, the limits on $\\epsilon_{{\\rm X},0.5-2~{\\rm keV}}$ and $\\bar{T}_{\\rm S}$ are conditional on the IGM neutral fraction.","PeriodicalId":8431,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

We use the latest multi-redshift ($z=6.5-8.7$) upper limits on the 21-cm signal from the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) to explore astrophysical models which are inconsistent with the data. These upper limits are achieved using 298 h of carefully excised data over four observing seasons. To explore these upper limits in the context of reionisation astrophysics, we use 21CMMC. We then connect the disfavoured regions of parameter space to existing observational constraints on reionisation such as high-$z$ galaxy ultra-violet (UV) luminosity functions, background UV photoionisation rate, intergalactic medium (IGM) neutral fraction, the electron scattering optical depth and the soft-band X-ray emissivity. We find the vast majority of models disfavoured by the MWA limits are already inconsistent with existing observational constraints. These inconsistent models arise from two classes of models: (i) `cold' reionisation and (ii) pure matter density fluctuations (i.e. no reionisation). However, a small subsample of models are consistent implying the existing MWA limits provide unique information in disfavouring models of reionisation, albeit extremely weakly. We also provide the first limits on the soft-band X-ray emissivity from galaxies at high redshifts, finding $1\sigma$ lower limits of $\epsilon_{{\rm X},0.5-2~{\rm keV}}\gtrsim10^{34.5}$ erg s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-3}$. Finally, we recover 95 per cent disfavoured limits on the IGM spin temperature of $\bar{T}_{\rm S}\lesssim$ 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.8, 2.1, 2.4 K at $z=6.5, 6.8, 7.1, 7.8, 8.2, 8.7$. With this we infer the IGM must have undergone, at the very least, a small amount of X-ray heating. Note, the limits on $\epsilon_{{\rm X},0.5-2~{\rm keV}}$ and $\bar{T}_{\rm S}$ are conditional on the IGM neutral fraction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在21厘米信号上用最近的多红移MWA上限探索再电离和高z星系观测
我们使用最新的多红移($z=6.5-8.7$)对来自默奇森宽场阵列(MWA)的21厘米信号的上限,以探索与数据不一致的天体物理模型。这些上限是在四个观测季节中使用298小时仔细切除的数据实现的。为了在再电离天体物理学的背景下探索这些上限,我们使用了21CMMC。然后,我们将参数空间的不利区域与现有的再电离观测约束(如高-)联系起来$z$ 星系紫外(UV)光度函数、背景紫外光电离率、星系间介质(IGM)中性分数、电子散射光学深度和软带x射线发射率。我们发现绝大多数不受MWA限制的模式已经与现有的观测约束不一致。这些不一致的模型来自两类模型:(i)"冷"再电离和(ii)纯物质密度波动(即无再电离)。然而,一小部分模型的子样本是一致的,这意味着现有的MWA极限在不利的再电离模型中提供了独特的信息,尽管非常微弱。我们还提供了在高红移星系的软波段x射线发射率的第一个限制,发现 $1\sigma$ 的下限 $\epsilon_{{\rm X},0.5-2~{\rm keV}}\gtrsim10^{34.5}$ Erg。$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-3}$. 最后,我们恢复了95%的对IGM自旋温度的不利限制 $\bar{T}_{\rm S}\lesssim$ 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.8, 2.1, 2.4 K at $z=6.5, 6.8, 7.1, 7.8, 8.2, 8.7$. 据此,我们推断IGM至少经历了少量的x射线加热。注意,限制在 $\epsilon_{{\rm X},0.5-2~{\rm keV}}$ 和 $\bar{T}_{\rm S}$ 以IGM中性分数为条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Primordial Black Holes: from Theory to Gravitational Wave Observations Chasing the Tail of Cosmic Reionization with Dark Gap Statistics in the Ly$α$ Forest over $5 < z < 6$ Hubble tension and absolute constraints on the local Hubble parameter. Towards an Optimal Estimation of Cosmological Parameters with the Wavelet Scattering Transform Assessment of the cosmic distance duality relation using Gaussian process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1