OTU-15 BSG trainees section survey 2020 – the impact of COVID-19 on UK gastroenterology training

Elizabeth Ratcliffe, Rebecca Harris, S. Raju, C. Cook, Philip D. Harvey
{"title":"OTU-15 BSG trainees section survey 2020 – the impact of COVID-19 on UK gastroenterology training","authors":"Elizabeth Ratcliffe, Rebecca Harris, S. Raju, C. Cook, Philip D. Harvey","doi":"10.1136/gutjnl-2021-bsg.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionThe impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted training during the initial peak and partial recovery. Gastroenterology higher speciality training (HST) is reaching an inflection point with a reduction from five years to four. The potential compound impact is a source of concern for HSTs. The BSG Trainees Section biennial survey 2020 aimed to delineate the impact of COVID-19 and opinions on changes to training.MethodsAn electronic survey allowing for anonymised responses at the point of completion was distributed to all gastroenterology HSTs over a three month period from September to November 2020.ResultsIn total, 349 trainees completed the survey (response rate of 51% of 687 HSTs) with representation across all regions. 89%(307/344) of responders were full time trainees and 39%(136/349) female. There was a reduction in access to clinics;48.4%(169/349) reported due to general internal medicine (GIM) duties and 26.6% (93/349) due to reduction in available clinics. Reduction in experience in gastroenterology referrals were also mainly limited by GIM commitments (42.4%) (148/349). No endoscopy training occurred for 88.5(170/192)% of trainees at the peak. Recovery of training lists was reported by 67.3(175/260)% of responders in late summer yet 20.6(72/349)% reported training lists were still ‘not allowed’ in their trust. 71.0 (206/290)% of responders reported their time was predominantly taken by GIM, with 42.1 (110/261)% considering the need to extend their CCT date to compensate for this. 49.0%(128/261) of respondents were considering time out of programme or fellowships and 28.3 (74/261)% considering it in the future. The majority of responders reported virtual or online teaching was provided during the peak of the pandemic.Considering future training;96.8%(245/253) of respondents stated gastroenterology HSTs should have 1 year experience on a GI bleed rota, however only 21.3 (55/258)% reported having experience of this formally during training. 68.8%(174/253) of responders supported the idea of blocks of GIM training during HST to protect gastroenterology training. The majority of trainees (84.2%)(213/253) reported they would not feel ready to be a consultant after 4 years of HST. 46.7(122/261)% of responders would stop GIM training if given the opportunity.ConclusionsIn all aspects of gastroenterology training surveyed, more than half of training time was lost during the pandemic. This included training beyond endoscopy to other aspects of GI work including clinics and referrals. This is mirrored in anticipated concerns about completion of training and the perceived future competence as a consultant at the end of a 4 year higher training programme. Work is now required to ensure training trajectories are restored following the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":19616,"journal":{"name":"Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-bsg.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

IntroductionThe impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted training during the initial peak and partial recovery. Gastroenterology higher speciality training (HST) is reaching an inflection point with a reduction from five years to four. The potential compound impact is a source of concern for HSTs. The BSG Trainees Section biennial survey 2020 aimed to delineate the impact of COVID-19 and opinions on changes to training.MethodsAn electronic survey allowing for anonymised responses at the point of completion was distributed to all gastroenterology HSTs over a three month period from September to November 2020.ResultsIn total, 349 trainees completed the survey (response rate of 51% of 687 HSTs) with representation across all regions. 89%(307/344) of responders were full time trainees and 39%(136/349) female. There was a reduction in access to clinics;48.4%(169/349) reported due to general internal medicine (GIM) duties and 26.6% (93/349) due to reduction in available clinics. Reduction in experience in gastroenterology referrals were also mainly limited by GIM commitments (42.4%) (148/349). No endoscopy training occurred for 88.5(170/192)% of trainees at the peak. Recovery of training lists was reported by 67.3(175/260)% of responders in late summer yet 20.6(72/349)% reported training lists were still ‘not allowed’ in their trust. 71.0 (206/290)% of responders reported their time was predominantly taken by GIM, with 42.1 (110/261)% considering the need to extend their CCT date to compensate for this. 49.0%(128/261) of respondents were considering time out of programme or fellowships and 28.3 (74/261)% considering it in the future. The majority of responders reported virtual or online teaching was provided during the peak of the pandemic.Considering future training;96.8%(245/253) of respondents stated gastroenterology HSTs should have 1 year experience on a GI bleed rota, however only 21.3 (55/258)% reported having experience of this formally during training. 68.8%(174/253) of responders supported the idea of blocks of GIM training during HST to protect gastroenterology training. The majority of trainees (84.2%)(213/253) reported they would not feel ready to be a consultant after 4 years of HST. 46.7(122/261)% of responders would stop GIM training if given the opportunity.ConclusionsIn all aspects of gastroenterology training surveyed, more than half of training time was lost during the pandemic. This included training beyond endoscopy to other aspects of GI work including clinics and referrals. This is mirrored in anticipated concerns about completion of training and the perceived future competence as a consultant at the end of a 4 year higher training programme. Work is now required to ensure training trajectories are restored following the COVID-19 pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2020年OTU-15 BSG学员部分调查- COVID-19对英国胃肠病学培训的影响
2019冠状病毒病大流行的影响扰乱了最初高峰和部分恢复期间的培训。胃肠病学高等专科培训(HST)正达到一个拐点,从五年减少到四年。潜在的综合影响是高强度sts关注的一个来源。BSG培训科2020年两年期调查旨在描述2019冠状病毒病的影响以及对培训改革的意见。方法在2020年9月至11月的三个月期间,向所有胃肠病学hst分发了一份允许在完成时匿名回答的电子调查。结果共有349名学员完成了调查(687名hst的回复率为51%),来自所有地区。89%(307/344)的应答者为全日制受训人员,39%(136/349)为女性。到诊所就诊的人数减少;据报告,48.4%(169/349)是由于普通内科(GIM)的职责,26.6%(93/349)是由于可用诊所的减少。胃肠病学转诊经验的减少也主要受到GIM承诺的限制(42.4%)(148/349)。88.5(170/192)%的受训者在高峰期未接受内窥镜检查训练。在夏末,67.3(175/260)%的应答者报告了培训清单的恢复,但20.6(72/349)%的应答者报告他们信任的培训清单仍然“不允许”。71.0(206/290)%的应答者报告他们的时间主要被GIM占用,42.1(110/261)%的应答者认为需要延长他们的CCT日期以弥补这一点。49.0%(128/261)的受访者正在考虑计划或研究金之外的时间,28.3%(74/261)的受访者正在考虑未来。大多数应答者报告说,在大流行高峰期提供了虚拟或在线教学。考虑到未来的培训,96.8%(245/253)的受访者表示胃肠病学HSTs应该有1年的胃肠道出血轮值经验,然而只有21.3(55/258)%的受访者报告在培训期间有正式的这方面的经验。68.8%(174/253)的应答者支持在HST期间阻断GIM培训以保护胃肠病学培训的想法。大多数受训人员(84.2%)(213/253)表示,在完成了4年的HST培训后,他们觉得自己还没有准备好成为一名咨询师。如果有机会,46.7%(122/261)的应答者会停止GIM培训。结论在调查的胃肠病学培训的各个方面中,大流行期间浪费了一半以上的培训时间。这包括内窥镜以外的胃肠道工作的其他方面的培训,包括诊所和转诊。这反映在预期的对培训完成情况的关注和在四年高等培训方案结束时作为顾问的未来能力的关注上。现在需要努力确保在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后恢复培训轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊最新文献
Real-Time Caries Detection of Bitewing Radiographs Using a Mobile Phone and an Artificial Neural Network: A Pilot Study Oral Cancer Disease among the Poor: A Sri Lankan Context Oro-Dental Pharmacovigilance in the Digital Age: Promoting Knowledge, Awareness, and Practice in Italy through a Smart Combined System—A Conference at the 30th National Congress of the Italian College of University Professors of Dental Disciplines Presurgical Decompensation in Patients Affected by Class III Dentoskeletal Malocclusion: A Comparison between Two Different Bracket Systems Corticotomy-Assisted Orthodontic Treatment: A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1