Scholar Failure: From the University Students’ Perception

Damián-Notario Jade Isabel, Torres-Zapata Ángel Esteban, Rivera-Domínguez Javier, Villanueva Echavarría José Rafael, Moguel-Ceballos Juan Eduardo
{"title":"Scholar Failure: From the University Students’ Perception","authors":"Damián-Notario Jade Isabel, Torres-Zapata Ángel Esteban, Rivera-Domínguez Javier, Villanueva Echavarría José Rafael, Moguel-Ceballos Juan Eduardo","doi":"10.53935/2641-533x.v3i2.140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholar failure, defined as the insufficient quantitative performance of the students’ potential which impedes them to achieve the minimum parameters stablished by an educative institution, generating in the student a feeling of letdown, and low performance, becoming a prelude to educational lagging and school dropout. The goal of this research was to determine the reasons of academic failure from the student perspective. This is a descriptive, cross-sectional study, with a non-probabilistic by convenience sampling, 66 students participated on it, who failed on at least one course on the August – December 2019 scholar period. The instrument applied gathers information such as: Name, gender, age, enrollment code, cycle, and the following question: Which do you consider where the reasons for your academic failure? The answers where later classified as follows 1) inherent to the student 2) inherent to the teacher, 3) inherent to the family or the family’s economy 4) inherent to the curricula, and 5) inherent to the institution. Results show that the two main reasons of academic failure from a student’s perspective are inherent to the student (49.5%) and inherent to the teacher (26.6%). These results, allow to determine analysis and opportunity zones that must be addressed to reduce the scholar failure and school dropout rates.","PeriodicalId":38257,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53935/2641-533x.v3i2.140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholar failure, defined as the insufficient quantitative performance of the students’ potential which impedes them to achieve the minimum parameters stablished by an educative institution, generating in the student a feeling of letdown, and low performance, becoming a prelude to educational lagging and school dropout. The goal of this research was to determine the reasons of academic failure from the student perspective. This is a descriptive, cross-sectional study, with a non-probabilistic by convenience sampling, 66 students participated on it, who failed on at least one course on the August – December 2019 scholar period. The instrument applied gathers information such as: Name, gender, age, enrollment code, cycle, and the following question: Which do you consider where the reasons for your academic failure? The answers where later classified as follows 1) inherent to the student 2) inherent to the teacher, 3) inherent to the family or the family’s economy 4) inherent to the curricula, and 5) inherent to the institution. Results show that the two main reasons of academic failure from a student’s perspective are inherent to the student (49.5%) and inherent to the teacher (26.6%). These results, allow to determine analysis and opportunity zones that must be addressed to reduce the scholar failure and school dropout rates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学者失败:来自大学生的认知
学者失败的定义是学生的潜力没有得到充分的量化表现,阻碍了他们达到教育机构设定的最低参数,使学生产生失望感,表现不佳,成为教育滞后和辍学的前奏。本研究的目的是从学生的角度来确定学业失败的原因。这是一项描述性横断面研究,采用非概率方便抽样,参与研究的66名学生在2019年8月至12月的学习期间至少有一门课程不及格。所使用的工具收集的信息包括:姓名、性别、年龄、入学代码、周期,以及以下问题:你认为你的学业失败的原因是什么?这些答案后来被分类为:1)学生的内在;2)教师的内在;3)家庭或家庭经济的内在;4)课程的内在;5)学校的内在。结果显示,从学生的角度来看,学业失败的两个主要原因是学生固有的(49.5%)和老师固有的(26.6%)。这些结果,允许确定分析和机会区域,必须解决,以减少学生失败和辍学率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Studies explores the processes of learning about the social and social learning.
期刊最新文献
Implications of positive psychology in community service guidance practice: A group intervention for community children Navigating the landscape of research paradigms: An overview and critique Situating Anti-Semitism in Anti-Racist Theory and Pedagogy: The Case for Holocaust Studies in Higher Education Antecedents of Job Satisfaction and Its Progressive Intertwinement with Organizational Commitment: From a Higher Education Perspective COVID-19 and School Education in Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1