Beyond fairness: the COVID-19 pandemic as an expression of environmental injustice

G. Sotiropoulos
{"title":"Beyond fairness: the COVID-19 pandemic as an expression of environmental injustice","authors":"G. Sotiropoulos","doi":"10.1080/1600910X.2022.2045617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The paper sets out to explore the significance of the concept of environmental justice for a critical study of the Covid-19 pandemic. This task involves questioning the prevailing equation of justice with fairness, the limits of which have become manifest during the pandemic. In its place, a more holistic conceptualization is required, which registers the material environment as a constitutive dimension of the actuality of justice. It is toward such a holistic conceptualization that environmental justice discourse points. Yet, to fully meet its critical potential, the notion of environmental justice needs to widen its scope beyond problems of unequal distribution and disproportionate exposure of disenfranchized groups. Moreover, it must confront its own distributional logic, which ends up reducing the concept's potency and actuality to an ethical judgment on the current state of the world, whose failure to live up to a set ideal is seen as leading to environmental disaster. This critical confrontation will be accomplished through a materialist theorization of justice as a diagrammatic process of environment-making. Looking at the Covid-19 pandemic through this theoretical lens, it will be conceived as an ‘ethological accident’, which expresses in its very contingency an injustice that is integral to capitalist environments.","PeriodicalId":42670,"journal":{"name":"Distinktion-Journal of Social Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Distinktion-Journal of Social Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2022.2045617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The paper sets out to explore the significance of the concept of environmental justice for a critical study of the Covid-19 pandemic. This task involves questioning the prevailing equation of justice with fairness, the limits of which have become manifest during the pandemic. In its place, a more holistic conceptualization is required, which registers the material environment as a constitutive dimension of the actuality of justice. It is toward such a holistic conceptualization that environmental justice discourse points. Yet, to fully meet its critical potential, the notion of environmental justice needs to widen its scope beyond problems of unequal distribution and disproportionate exposure of disenfranchized groups. Moreover, it must confront its own distributional logic, which ends up reducing the concept's potency and actuality to an ethical judgment on the current state of the world, whose failure to live up to a set ideal is seen as leading to environmental disaster. This critical confrontation will be accomplished through a materialist theorization of justice as a diagrammatic process of environment-making. Looking at the Covid-19 pandemic through this theoretical lens, it will be conceived as an ‘ethological accident’, which expresses in its very contingency an injustice that is integral to capitalist environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越公平:2019冠状病毒病大流行是环境不公正的表现
本文旨在探讨环境正义概念对Covid-19大流行批判性研究的意义。这项任务涉及质疑普遍存在的正义与公平的等量观,这种等量观的局限性在大流行病期间已变得明显。取而代之的是需要一种更全面的概念化,将物质环境作为正义现状的一个构成方面。环境正义话语所指向的正是这样一个整体概念。然而,为了充分发挥其关键潜力,环境正义的概念需要扩大其范围,超越分配不平等和被剥夺公民权的群体受到不成比例的影响的问题。此外,它必须面对自己的分配逻辑,这种逻辑最终将概念的效力和现实性降低为对世界现状的道德判断,而世界现状的失败不符合既定的理想被视为导致环境灾难。这种批判性的对抗将通过唯物主义的正义理论化来实现,这是一个环境制造的图解过程。通过这一理论视角来看待Covid-19大流行,它将被视为一种“行为上的意外”,在其偶然性中表达了资本主义环境中不可或缺的不公正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Special issue: the elements of theorizing The end (and persistence) of subjectivity: Lukács with Adorno, Adorno with Lukács Totality and incoherence: for a shared project of novel theory and black studies Thinking hegemony otherwise – an educational critique of Mouffe’s agonism (Re)search results: search engines and the logic of efficiency in scholarship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1