{"title":"Contrast Sensitivity and Glare Disability in Different IOL Types After Clear-corneal Cataract Surgery","authors":"F.K. Jacobi, T. Kohnen, B. Dick","doi":"10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80037-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>OBJECTIVE:</strong> The effect of one PMMA and, two different silicone IOLs on contrast sensitivity and glare disability was evaluated in a selected series of patients (best cases) following clearcorneal incision phacoemulsification. <strong>STUDY DESIGN:</strong> Prospective clinical study of visual function 6 months postoperatively. <strong>SETTING:</strong> Department of Ophthalmology, University of Giessen, Germany. PATIENTS: Forty-two patients with visual acuity (VA) of 0.8 (logMAR unit) or better. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic conditions using a sinusoidal grating pattern wall chart (Vistech Consultants, Dayton, Ohio); CS and glare disability under mesopic conditions using the Mesotest (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). RESULTS: No significant difference in CS and glare disability between the different IOL groups can be demonstrated. Differentiating according to age showed that patients in the 70-and-over age group had significantly lower CS values compared with patients in the 70-and-below age group. No difference in glare disability between the age groups could be determined. <strong>CONCLUSIONS:</strong> Examination of visual function by means of contrast sensitivity and glare disability testing after successful clear-corneal cataract surgery shows no difference between the different silicone IOLs and PMMA IOL, respectively. Patient age is a more important factor in CS than IOL-type and material in good VA and absence of other ocular pathology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100500,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery","volume":"7 4","pages":"Pages 214-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80037-8","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955368113800378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The effect of one PMMA and, two different silicone IOLs on contrast sensitivity and glare disability was evaluated in a selected series of patients (best cases) following clearcorneal incision phacoemulsification. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study of visual function 6 months postoperatively. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Giessen, Germany. PATIENTS: Forty-two patients with visual acuity (VA) of 0.8 (logMAR unit) or better. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic conditions using a sinusoidal grating pattern wall chart (Vistech Consultants, Dayton, Ohio); CS and glare disability under mesopic conditions using the Mesotest (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). RESULTS: No significant difference in CS and glare disability between the different IOL groups can be demonstrated. Differentiating according to age showed that patients in the 70-and-over age group had significantly lower CS values compared with patients in the 70-and-below age group. No difference in glare disability between the age groups could be determined. CONCLUSIONS: Examination of visual function by means of contrast sensitivity and glare disability testing after successful clear-corneal cataract surgery shows no difference between the different silicone IOLs and PMMA IOL, respectively. Patient age is a more important factor in CS than IOL-type and material in good VA and absence of other ocular pathology.