Autonomy vs. control: Associations among parental mediation, perceived parenting styles, and U. S. adolescents’ risky online experiences

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace Pub Date : 2022-04-14 DOI:10.5817/cp2022-2-5
R. Young, M. Tully
{"title":"Autonomy vs. control: Associations among parental mediation, perceived parenting styles, and U. S. adolescents’ risky online experiences","authors":"R. Young, M. Tully","doi":"10.5817/cp2022-2-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parenting that supports autonomy and promotes open communication leads to better outcomes for adolescents. In an era of digital media, however, adolescent desire for autonomy may conflict with parental mediation practices that exert control over media use. A survey of 356 U.S. parent-child dyads was conducted. Regression analyses showed that withdrawing access to digital media as punishment is negatively associated with adolescent perception of autonomy-supportive parenting, while monitoring and punishment are positively associated with perception of controlling parenting. Results of a mediation analysis suggest that adolescent perceptions of controlling parenting are associated with the expectation of adverse outcomes from communication. The results of our study suggest parents can best protect children from risky online experiences by supporting adolescent autonomy through active mediation","PeriodicalId":46651,"journal":{"name":"Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyberpsychology-Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cp2022-2-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Parenting that supports autonomy and promotes open communication leads to better outcomes for adolescents. In an era of digital media, however, adolescent desire for autonomy may conflict with parental mediation practices that exert control over media use. A survey of 356 U.S. parent-child dyads was conducted. Regression analyses showed that withdrawing access to digital media as punishment is negatively associated with adolescent perception of autonomy-supportive parenting, while monitoring and punishment are positively associated with perception of controlling parenting. Results of a mediation analysis suggest that adolescent perceptions of controlling parenting are associated with the expectation of adverse outcomes from communication. The results of our study suggest parents can best protect children from risky online experiences by supporting adolescent autonomy through active mediation
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自主与控制:父母调解、感知的父母方式和美国青少年危险的网络体验之间的联系
支持自主和促进开放沟通的养育方式会给青少年带来更好的结果。然而,在数字媒体时代,青少年对自主的渴望可能与父母对媒体使用施加控制的调解做法相冲突。一项针对356对美国父母和孩子的调查进行了。回归分析显示,作为惩罚,停止使用数字媒体与青少年对自主支持型养育方式的认知呈负相关,而监控和惩罚与控制型养育方式的认知呈正相关。中介分析的结果表明,青少年控制父母的观念与预期不良后果的沟通有关。我们的研究结果表明,父母可以通过积极的调解来支持青少年的自主权,从而最好地保护孩子免受危险的在线体验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
6.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
The relationship between preference for online social interaction and affective well-being via compulsive dating app use: The moderating role of algorithmic beliefs The psychological impacts of content moderation on content moderators: A qualitative study Online pornography use and sexual satisfaction in association with relationship satisfaction among middle-aged and older people Facebook, social comparison and happiness: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment User experience of mixed reality applications for healthy ageing: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1