Scoring System for Identifying Impending Complete Fractures in Incomplete Atypical Femoral Fractures

B. Min, K. Koo, Youn-Soo Park, C. Oh, Seung-Jae Lim, Joon-Woo Kim, Kyung-Jae Lee, Young-Kyun Lee
{"title":"Scoring System for Identifying Impending Complete Fractures in Incomplete Atypical Femoral Fractures","authors":"B. Min, K. Koo, Youn-Soo Park, C. Oh, Seung-Jae Lim, Joon-Woo Kim, Kyung-Jae Lee, Young-Kyun Lee","doi":"10.1210/jc.2016-2787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context\nAlthough impending incomplete atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) require prophylactic fixation, there is still a lack of study on predicting complete fracture among the incomplete AFFs.\n\n\nObjective\nOur purposes are to develop a scoring system to predict progression into complete fracture and to evaluate its reliability and validity.\n\n\nDesign, Setting, and Patients\nWe reviewed 46 incomplete AFFs in 44 patients who did not undergo prophylactic fixation. A weighted scoring system, including four identified risk factors (the site, severity of pain, status of the contralateral femur, and the extent of radiolucent line), was developed. We evaluated its interobserver reliability by using intraclass correlation coefficiency (ICC) and its accuracy using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. The validity of the scoring system was tested in a different cohort.\n\n\nIntervention\nObservational study.\n\n\nMain Outcome Measure\nProgression to complete fracture within 6 months.\n\n\nResults\nAmong 46 incomplete fractures, 13 developed a complete fracture within 6 months. The probability of complete fracture increased abruptly when the score was 8 points or more. The proposed scoring system showed an almost perfect reliability (ICC, 0.997; 95% confidence interval, 0.995 to 0.998) and higher accuracy than any single risk factor in ROC curve. In the different series, the positive predictive value was 100% and the sensitivity was 75%, when cutoff value was 8 points.\n\n\nConclusion\nThe progression to complete fracture could be predicted by using our scoring system. Incomplete AFF with scores <8 points can be treated conservatively, whereas lesions with scores ≥8 require prophylactic fixation.","PeriodicalId":22632,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":"42 1","pages":"545–550"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-2787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Context Although impending incomplete atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) require prophylactic fixation, there is still a lack of study on predicting complete fracture among the incomplete AFFs. Objective Our purposes are to develop a scoring system to predict progression into complete fracture and to evaluate its reliability and validity. Design, Setting, and Patients We reviewed 46 incomplete AFFs in 44 patients who did not undergo prophylactic fixation. A weighted scoring system, including four identified risk factors (the site, severity of pain, status of the contralateral femur, and the extent of radiolucent line), was developed. We evaluated its interobserver reliability by using intraclass correlation coefficiency (ICC) and its accuracy using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. The validity of the scoring system was tested in a different cohort. Intervention Observational study. Main Outcome Measure Progression to complete fracture within 6 months. Results Among 46 incomplete fractures, 13 developed a complete fracture within 6 months. The probability of complete fracture increased abruptly when the score was 8 points or more. The proposed scoring system showed an almost perfect reliability (ICC, 0.997; 95% confidence interval, 0.995 to 0.998) and higher accuracy than any single risk factor in ROC curve. In the different series, the positive predictive value was 100% and the sensitivity was 75%, when cutoff value was 8 points. Conclusion The progression to complete fracture could be predicted by using our scoring system. Incomplete AFF with scores <8 points can be treated conservatively, whereas lesions with scores ≥8 require prophylactic fixation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不完全性非典型股骨骨折中即将发生完全性骨折的评分系统
虽然即将发生的不完全性非典型股骨骨折(AFFs)需要预防性固定,但目前仍缺乏预测不完全性AFFs完全骨折的研究。目的:我们的目的是建立一个评分系统来预测完全性骨折的进展,并评估其可靠性和有效性。设计、环境和患者我们回顾了44例未进行预防性固定的46例不完全af患者。制定了一个加权评分系统,包括四个确定的危险因素(部位、疼痛严重程度、对侧股骨状态和放射透光线的范围)。我们用类内相关系数(ICC)评估其观察者间信度,用receiver operator characteristic (ROC)曲线评估其准确性。在不同的队列中测试了评分系统的有效性。InterventionObservational研究。主要观察指标进展至6个月内完全骨折。结果46例不完全骨折中,13例在6个月内发生完全骨折。当评分在8分及以上时,完全性骨折的概率急剧增加。该评分系统具有近乎完美的信度(ICC, 0.997;95%可信区间为0.995 ~ 0.998),准确度高于任何单一危险因素。在不同的序列中,当截断值为8点时,阳性预测值为100%,灵敏度为75%。结论该评分系统可以预测骨折的进展情况。评分<8分的不完全AFF可以保守治疗,而评分≥8分的病变需要预防性固定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of targeted therapy for radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis. Treatment Preferences in Patients with Hypothyroidism: an Analysis of Eleven Randomized Controlled Trials. Metabolomics: A Promising Tool in the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Obesity. Association between papillary thyroid cancer and primary aldosteronism in individuals with hypertension. The changing treatment paradigm in prolactinoma - a prospective series of 100 consecutive neurosurgical cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1