Impact of a teaching program on outcome quality of white light transurethral resection for bladder tumor: A cohort study

R. Hurle, R. Peschechera, N. Buffi, G. Lughezzani, E. Morenghi, A. Saita, L. Pasini, P. Casale, M. Seveso, Silvia Zandegiacomo, G. Taverna, A. Benetti, I. Vavassori, P. Colombo, M. Lazzeri, G. Guazzoni
{"title":"Impact of a teaching program on outcome quality of white light transurethral resection for bladder tumor: A cohort study","authors":"R. Hurle, R. Peschechera, N. Buffi, G. Lughezzani, E. Morenghi, A. Saita, L. Pasini, P. Casale, M. Seveso, Silvia Zandegiacomo, G. Taverna, A. Benetti, I. Vavassori, P. Colombo, M. Lazzeri, G. Guazzoni","doi":"10.5430/JST.V6N2P56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To test the hypothesis that a teaching program improves the quality of transurethral resection of bladder tumor(TURBT) and decreases the risk of early recurrence. Material and methods: This is an observational retrospective cohort study of prospectively recorded data of patients withfirst clinical diagnosis of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), scheduled for TURBT. In 2005 a systematic TURBTteaching program was introduced in our Department. We reviewed the charts of patients who underwent TURBT in the years1998-2004, when no tutoring was applied, and those who underwent TURBT in the years 2005-2010. The outcomes of interestwere: presence/absence of detrusor muscle (DM), carcinoma in situ (CIS) detection, complication rate and recurrence rate at thefirst follow-up cystoscopy (RRFF-C). Results: Complete data from 427 patients were available: 199 before and 228 after the introduction of the teaching program.Multivariable logistic analysis showed that the training program was an independent prognostic factor for DM (presence) rate(OR = 3.92, 95%CI = 2.42-6.33), CIS detection rate (OR = 4.36, 95%CI = 1.92-9.86), and complication rate (OR = 0.28, 95%CI= 0.15-0.55), but not for RRFF-C (OR = 0.79, 95%CI = 0.52-1.20). Between 1998-2004, RRFF-C was correlated with tumornumber, pathological stage, DM presence, presence of complication, CIS detection and surgeon experience. After the introductionof the teaching program, only tumor number, DM presence and surgeon experience influenced the RRFF-C. Conclusion: Our findings suggest the hypothesis that the teaching program might have an impact of quality of TURBT, but itfailed to improve the RRFF-C.","PeriodicalId":17174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Solid Tumors","volume":"59 1","pages":"56-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Solid Tumors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/JST.V6N2P56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: To test the hypothesis that a teaching program improves the quality of transurethral resection of bladder tumor(TURBT) and decreases the risk of early recurrence. Material and methods: This is an observational retrospective cohort study of prospectively recorded data of patients withfirst clinical diagnosis of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), scheduled for TURBT. In 2005 a systematic TURBTteaching program was introduced in our Department. We reviewed the charts of patients who underwent TURBT in the years1998-2004, when no tutoring was applied, and those who underwent TURBT in the years 2005-2010. The outcomes of interestwere: presence/absence of detrusor muscle (DM), carcinoma in situ (CIS) detection, complication rate and recurrence rate at thefirst follow-up cystoscopy (RRFF-C). Results: Complete data from 427 patients were available: 199 before and 228 after the introduction of the teaching program.Multivariable logistic analysis showed that the training program was an independent prognostic factor for DM (presence) rate(OR = 3.92, 95%CI = 2.42-6.33), CIS detection rate (OR = 4.36, 95%CI = 1.92-9.86), and complication rate (OR = 0.28, 95%CI= 0.15-0.55), but not for RRFF-C (OR = 0.79, 95%CI = 0.52-1.20). Between 1998-2004, RRFF-C was correlated with tumornumber, pathological stage, DM presence, presence of complication, CIS detection and surgeon experience. After the introductionof the teaching program, only tumor number, DM presence and surgeon experience influenced the RRFF-C. Conclusion: Our findings suggest the hypothesis that the teaching program might have an impact of quality of TURBT, but itfailed to improve the RRFF-C.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教学计划对经尿道白光膀胱肿瘤切除术疗效质量的影响:一项队列研究
目的:验证教学方案对提高经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(turt)质量和降低早期复发风险的作用。材料和方法:这是一项观察性回顾性队列研究,对首次临床诊断为非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的患者进行前瞻性记录,计划进行TURBT。2005年,我校引进了系统的turbt教学项目。我们回顾了1998-2004年未接受辅导的TURBT患者和2005-2010年接受TURBT患者的图表。我们关注的结果是:尿逼肌(DM)的有无、原位癌(CIS)的检测、第一次随访膀胱镜检查(RRFF-C)的并发症发生率和复发率。结果:获得427例患者的完整资料:引入教学方案前199例,引入教学方案后228例。多变量logistic分析显示,训练计划是DM(存在)率(OR = 3.92, 95%CI= 2.42-6.33)、CIS检出率(OR = 4.36, 95%CI= 1.92-9.86)和并发症发生率(OR = 0.28, 95%CI= 0.15-0.55)的独立预后因素,但对RRFF-C (OR = 0.79, 95%CI= 0.52-1.20)没有影响。1998-2004年间,RRFF-C与肿瘤数量、病理分期、是否存在DM、是否存在并发症、CIS检测及手术经验相关。引入教学方案后,影响RRFF-C的只有肿瘤数量、DM存在情况和手术经验。结论:我们的研究结果表明,教学计划可能会影响turt的质量,但不能提高RRFF-C。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Description of multiparametric targeting techniques for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation in refractory ventricular tachycardia: A quaternary medical center experience Prognostic significance of pretreatment inflammatory biomarkers in non-metastatic breast cancer Prognostic significance of SOX2 and GPC3 in Ameloblastoma and its malignant counterpart (Ameloblastic Carcinoma) Tumor stroma ratio as a parameter for prognosis and clinicopathological behavior of oral squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study A pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of PEC blocks in minimising chronic post-mastectomy pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1