Quality assurance and accreditation.

Q.A. brief Pub Date : 1997-01-01 DOI:10.4324/9780203878774-9
Information Systems, Mohammed Hatem, A. Said, Eng Osama, Shible Youness, Eng Reda, Mohamed Hussien Annex, A. Said, Shible Osama, Eng Youness, Mohamed Reda, Mabrouk
{"title":"Quality assurance and accreditation.","authors":"Information Systems, Mohammed Hatem, A. Said, Eng Osama, Shible Youness, Eng Reda, Mohamed Hussien Annex, A. Said, Shible Osama, Eng Youness, Mohamed Reda, Mabrouk","doi":"10.4324/9780203878774-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1996, the Joint Commission International (JCI), which is a partnership between the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and Quality Healthcare Resources, Inc., became one of the contractors of the Quality Assurance Project (QAP). JCI recognizes the link between accreditation and quality, and uses a collaborative approach to help a country develop national quality standards that will improve patient care, satisfy patient-centered objectives, and serve the interest of all affected parties. The implementation of good standards provides support for the good performance of professionals, introduces new ideas for improvement, enhances the quality of patient care, reduces costs, increases efficiency, strengthens public confidence, improves management, and enhances the involvement of the medical staff. Such good standards are objective and measurable; achievable with current resources; adaptable to different institutions and cultures; and demonstrate autonomy, flexibility, and creativity. The QAP offers the opportunity to approach accreditation through research efforts, training programs, and regulatory processes. QAP work in the area of accreditation has been targeted for Zambia, where the goal is to provide equal access to cost-effective, quality health care; Jordan, where a consensus process for the development of standards, guidelines, and policies has been initiated; and Ecuador, where JCI has been asked to help plan an approach to the evaluation and monitoring of the health care delivery system.","PeriodicalId":85368,"journal":{"name":"Q.A. brief","volume":"44 1","pages":"17-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Q.A. brief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203878774-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

In 1996, the Joint Commission International (JCI), which is a partnership between the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and Quality Healthcare Resources, Inc., became one of the contractors of the Quality Assurance Project (QAP). JCI recognizes the link between accreditation and quality, and uses a collaborative approach to help a country develop national quality standards that will improve patient care, satisfy patient-centered objectives, and serve the interest of all affected parties. The implementation of good standards provides support for the good performance of professionals, introduces new ideas for improvement, enhances the quality of patient care, reduces costs, increases efficiency, strengthens public confidence, improves management, and enhances the involvement of the medical staff. Such good standards are objective and measurable; achievable with current resources; adaptable to different institutions and cultures; and demonstrate autonomy, flexibility, and creativity. The QAP offers the opportunity to approach accreditation through research efforts, training programs, and regulatory processes. QAP work in the area of accreditation has been targeted for Zambia, where the goal is to provide equal access to cost-effective, quality health care; Jordan, where a consensus process for the development of standards, guidelines, and policies has been initiated; and Ecuador, where JCI has been asked to help plan an approach to the evaluation and monitoring of the health care delivery system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
质量保证和认证。
1996年,国际联合委员会(JCI)成为质量保证项目(QAP)的承包商之一,该委员会是医疗保健组织认证联合委员会和优质医疗保健资源公司之间的合作伙伴关系。JCI认识到认证与质量之间的联系,并采用协作方法帮助一个国家制定国家质量标准,以改善患者护理,实现以患者为中心的目标,并为所有受影响方的利益服务。实施良好的标准为专业人员的良好表现提供了支持,引入了改进的新思路,提高了病人护理的质量,降低了成本,提高了效率,增强了公众的信心,改善了管理,并加强了医务人员的参与。这种好的标准是客观的、可衡量的;以现有资源可实现;适应不同的制度和文化;表现出自主性、灵活性和创造力。QAP提供了通过研究工作、培训计划和监管程序获得认证的机会。质量保证方案在认证领域的工作以赞比亚为目标,其目标是提供平等获得具有成本效益的优质保健服务的机会;约旦,已经启动了制定标准、准则和政策的协商一致进程;在厄瓜多尔,国际合作委员会被要求帮助规划一种评估和监测卫生保健提供系统的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Country experience in organizing for quality: Zambia. Country experience in organizing for quality: Chile. Country experience in organizing for quality: Ecuador. Organizing for quality: options for country programs. Country experience in organizing for quality: Niger.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1