Retention of Physicochemical and Antioxidant Properties of Dehydrated Bael (Aegle Marmelos) and Palmyra (Borassus Flabellifer) Fruit Powders

R.M.N.A. Wijewardana , S.B. Nawarathne , I. Wickramasinghe , C.R. Gunawardane , W.M.C.B. Wasala , B.M.K.S. Thilakarathne
{"title":"Retention of Physicochemical and Antioxidant Properties of Dehydrated Bael (Aegle Marmelos) and Palmyra (Borassus Flabellifer) Fruit Powders","authors":"R.M.N.A. Wijewardana ,&nbsp;S.B. Nawarathne ,&nbsp;I. Wickramasinghe ,&nbsp;C.R. Gunawardane ,&nbsp;W.M.C.B. Wasala ,&nbsp;B.M.K.S. Thilakarathne","doi":"10.1016/j.profoo.2016.02.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Present study was carried out to evaluate the effect of various dehydration techniques such as sun drying, solar drying, drying after freezing (Freeze for one hour followed by mechanical drying at 55<!--> <!-->°C), vacuum drying and drying using lab scale air oven on proximate composition and retention of antioxidants in different fruit powder prepared from Bael (<em>Aegle marmelos)</em> and Palmyra (<em>Borassus flabellifer).</em> Moisture content, Total Ash, Crude fiber %, Fat %, Crude protein %, total phenolic content,β –Carotene and antioxidant activity were tested. The antioxidant activity was measured based on the ability of fruit extract to scavenge 1, 1- diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH). Among different drying treatments the highest fat percentage recorded by the solar dried palmyra fruit powder and there is no significant difference (α= 0.05) between sun drying and vacuumed drying. Higher concentration of β -Carotene and total phenolic content were recorded in vacuum dried samples both in bael and Palmyra fruit powders and it significantly different (α= 0.05) from other treatments. The scavenging activity of bael fruit powder in vacuum drying was ranged from 65.36% to 81.33% of the concentration 200<!--> <!-->μg/ml to1000<!--> <!-->μg/ml and the palmyra fruit powder was recorded 57.32% to 83.25% of the concentration 200<!--> <!-->μg/ml to1000<!--> <!-->μg/ml. Vacuum dried fruit powders of palmyra and bael were given highest radical scavenging activity and the scavenging activity of palmyra fruit powder is higher than the bael. Therefore vacuum drying can be recommended as the most effective drying method to protect chemical characteristics and retention of antioxidant properties of fruit powders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20478,"journal":{"name":"Procedia food science","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 170-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.profoo.2016.02.041","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia food science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211601X16000420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Present study was carried out to evaluate the effect of various dehydration techniques such as sun drying, solar drying, drying after freezing (Freeze for one hour followed by mechanical drying at 55 °C), vacuum drying and drying using lab scale air oven on proximate composition and retention of antioxidants in different fruit powder prepared from Bael (Aegle marmelos) and Palmyra (Borassus flabellifer). Moisture content, Total Ash, Crude fiber %, Fat %, Crude protein %, total phenolic content,β –Carotene and antioxidant activity were tested. The antioxidant activity was measured based on the ability of fruit extract to scavenge 1, 1- diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH). Among different drying treatments the highest fat percentage recorded by the solar dried palmyra fruit powder and there is no significant difference (α= 0.05) between sun drying and vacuumed drying. Higher concentration of β -Carotene and total phenolic content were recorded in vacuum dried samples both in bael and Palmyra fruit powders and it significantly different (α= 0.05) from other treatments. The scavenging activity of bael fruit powder in vacuum drying was ranged from 65.36% to 81.33% of the concentration 200 μg/ml to1000 μg/ml and the palmyra fruit powder was recorded 57.32% to 83.25% of the concentration 200 μg/ml to1000 μg/ml. Vacuum dried fruit powders of palmyra and bael were given highest radical scavenging activity and the scavenging activity of palmyra fruit powder is higher than the bael. Therefore vacuum drying can be recommended as the most effective drying method to protect chemical characteristics and retention of antioxidant properties of fruit powders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脱水果粉的理化性质及抗氧化性能的保留
本文研究了太阳干燥、日光干燥、冷冻后干燥(55°C冷冻1小时后机械干燥)、真空干燥和实验室规模风箱干燥等不同脱水工艺对不同果粉中抗氧化剂近似组成和保留率的影响。测定水分含量、总灰分、粗纤维%、脂肪%、粗蛋白质%、总酚含量、β -胡萝卜素和抗氧化活性。通过测定果实提取物清除1,1 -二苯基-2-苦味酰肼(DPPH)的能力来测定其抗氧化活性。在不同干燥处理中,太阳晒干的棕榈果粉脂肪率最高,与真空干燥无显著差异(α= 0.05)。bael果粉和Palmyra果粉的真空干燥样品中β -胡萝卜素和总酚含量均高于其他处理(α= 0.05)。bael果粉在200 μg/ml ~ 1000 μg/ml真空干燥条件下的清除率为65.36% ~ 81.33%,palmyra果粉在200 μg/ml ~ 1000 μg/ml真空干燥条件下的清除率为57.32% ~ 83.25%。巴尔米拉果粉和bael果粉的清除自由基活性最高,巴尔米拉果粉的清除自由基活性高于bael果粉。因此,真空干燥是保护果粉化学特性和保持果粉抗氧化性能最有效的干燥方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents List Contents List A Comparative Study on Antioxidant and DNA Protective Activity of Different Skin Coloured Brinjal (Solanum Melongena) Microbiological Quality of Raw Milk and Effect on Quality by Implementing Good Management Practices Challenges in Food Safety as Part of Food Security: Lessons Learnt on Food Safety in a Globalized World
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1