Improving healthcare quality in the United States healthcare system: A scientific management approach

Soumya Upadhyay, William Opoku-Agyeman
{"title":"Improving healthcare quality in the United States healthcare system: A scientific management approach","authors":"Soumya Upadhyay, William Opoku-Agyeman","doi":"10.5430/jha.v9n5p19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The US healthcare system has been facing pressures from stakeholders to reduce costs and improve quality. The purpose of this paper is to develop a conceptual model to illustrate the approaches used in healthcare quality management (Continuous Quality Improvement/Total Quality Management, Lean, and Six Sigma) weaved into the underlying framework of scientific management theory. This paper employs scientific management theory to explain the healthcare quality tenets that influence the quality of care in our healthcare organizations. The father of scientific management, Frederick Taylor, and other key contributors collectively created scientific management principles, which are widely used for quality improvement purposes both in the engineering and the healthcare field. Healthcare quality is also discussed with examples of the application of scientific management principles. Shared themes between scientific management principles and healthcare quality tenets, as given in CQI/TQM, Six Sigma-Lean, and Donabedian Model, were developed. To understand the three pillars of quality (structure, process, outcome) in relation to the underpinnings of scientific management principles, we incorporated insights of scientific management theory into Donabedian’s healthcare quality model. It is recommended that selection of personnel play a more significant role among human resources practices in organizations; strategy formulation must include a careful assessment of organizations’ strengths and weaknesses with regard to continuous quality improvement, with organizations striving to achieve standardization to attain efficiency and reduce costs.","PeriodicalId":15872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Administration","volume":"304 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v9n5p19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The US healthcare system has been facing pressures from stakeholders to reduce costs and improve quality. The purpose of this paper is to develop a conceptual model to illustrate the approaches used in healthcare quality management (Continuous Quality Improvement/Total Quality Management, Lean, and Six Sigma) weaved into the underlying framework of scientific management theory. This paper employs scientific management theory to explain the healthcare quality tenets that influence the quality of care in our healthcare organizations. The father of scientific management, Frederick Taylor, and other key contributors collectively created scientific management principles, which are widely used for quality improvement purposes both in the engineering and the healthcare field. Healthcare quality is also discussed with examples of the application of scientific management principles. Shared themes between scientific management principles and healthcare quality tenets, as given in CQI/TQM, Six Sigma-Lean, and Donabedian Model, were developed. To understand the three pillars of quality (structure, process, outcome) in relation to the underpinnings of scientific management principles, we incorporated insights of scientific management theory into Donabedian’s healthcare quality model. It is recommended that selection of personnel play a more significant role among human resources practices in organizations; strategy formulation must include a careful assessment of organizations’ strengths and weaknesses with regard to continuous quality improvement, with organizations striving to achieve standardization to attain efficiency and reduce costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高美国医疗保健系统的医疗质量:科学的管理方法
美国医疗保健系统一直面临着来自利益相关者的压力,要求他们降低成本,提高质量。本文的目的是建立一个概念模型来说明医疗质量管理中使用的方法(持续质量改进/全面质量管理、精益和六西格玛),这些方法被编织成科学管理理论的基本框架。本文运用科学的管理理论来解释影响我国医疗机构医疗质量的医疗质量原则。科学管理之父Frederick Taylor和其他主要贡献者共同创建了科学管理原则,这些原则被广泛用于工程和医疗保健领域的质量改进目的。还讨论了医疗保健质量,并举例说明了科学管理原则的应用。开发了科学管理原则和医疗保健质量原则之间的共享主题,如CQI/TQM、六西格玛-精益和Donabedian模型中给出的主题。为了理解质量的三大支柱(结构、过程、结果)与科学管理原则基础的关系,我们将科学管理理论的见解纳入了Donabedian的医疗保健质量模型。建议在组织的人力资源实践中,人员选择发挥更重要的作用;战略制定必须包括仔细评估组织在持续质量改进方面的优势和劣势,组织努力实现标准化以获得效率和降低成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The reality of patient bodily waste management: Nurse perceptions of current practice & staff safety Facilitators and barriers for high-reliability training in medical centers Quality of care and emergency department throughput during the COVID-19 pandemic in a community health system Pandemic in a Community Health System Comparison of nursing staffing ratio in selected safety net and non-safety net hospitals in the United States Challenges and opportunities in achieving secure hospital clinical mobility management: An illustrative use case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1