The Role of Technology Acceptance in Predicting Knowledge Sharing Among Students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Q4 Social Sciences Strides in Development of Medical Education Pub Date : 2019-01-28 DOI:10.5812/sdme.87036
G. Salimi, Mehdi Mohamaddi, M. Mehrvarz, Kamal Hashemi
{"title":"The Role of Technology Acceptance in Predicting Knowledge Sharing Among Students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences","authors":"G. Salimi, Mehdi Mohamaddi, M. Mehrvarz, Kamal Hashemi","doi":"10.5812/sdme.87036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Today knowledge and information sharing by means of new technologies among university students and faculty members is important. Therefore, it is necessary to identify factors which influence knowledge sharing among university students. Objectives: The main purpose of the present study was to examine the role of technology acceptance in improving knowledge sharing among students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Methods: In this applied research, a descriptive-analytic cross-sectional study was used. The study sample consisted of 228 medical students from Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. The data collection tools included two questionnaires, i.e., technology acceptance (Toe, 2011) and knowledge sharing (Van den Hoof & Van Weenen, 2004) questionnaires. The validity of these scales in terms of form and content was examined by experts in the field, and their reliability was confirmed by measuring Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. The reliability of technology acceptance and knowledge sharing questionnaires was 0.83 and 0.72, respectively. After confirming the validity and reliability of the questionnaires, they were distributed among the participants. Finally, the collected data were analyzed using one-sample t-test and Pearson’s correlation coefficient test in SPSS and structural equation modeling (SEM) in Lisrel 8.8. Results: The results of one-sample t-test showed that the levels of technology acceptance and knowledge sharing were higher than the acceptable level among medical students. In addition, the results of Pearson’s correlation test indicated a significant positive relationship between technology acceptance (and its components) and knowledge sharing. In addition, SEM showed that technology acceptance is a significant positive predictor of knowledge sharing among students. Among different components of technology acceptance, only perceived usefulness (PU) and facilitating conditions (FC) were significant predictors of knowledge collecting (P = 0.37 and 0.28, respectively). Nevertheless, other components of technology acceptance could not predict different types of knowledge sharing. Conclusions: The present results showed that PU and FC could predict the knowledge sharing of students more than other components. To improve knowledge sharing in the context of higher medical education, different aspects of technology acceptance need to be evaluated and expanded; accordingly, establishment of new educational policies is necessary.","PeriodicalId":34340,"journal":{"name":"Strides in Development of Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strides in Development of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.87036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Today knowledge and information sharing by means of new technologies among university students and faculty members is important. Therefore, it is necessary to identify factors which influence knowledge sharing among university students. Objectives: The main purpose of the present study was to examine the role of technology acceptance in improving knowledge sharing among students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Methods: In this applied research, a descriptive-analytic cross-sectional study was used. The study sample consisted of 228 medical students from Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. The data collection tools included two questionnaires, i.e., technology acceptance (Toe, 2011) and knowledge sharing (Van den Hoof & Van Weenen, 2004) questionnaires. The validity of these scales in terms of form and content was examined by experts in the field, and their reliability was confirmed by measuring Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. The reliability of technology acceptance and knowledge sharing questionnaires was 0.83 and 0.72, respectively. After confirming the validity and reliability of the questionnaires, they were distributed among the participants. Finally, the collected data were analyzed using one-sample t-test and Pearson’s correlation coefficient test in SPSS and structural equation modeling (SEM) in Lisrel 8.8. Results: The results of one-sample t-test showed that the levels of technology acceptance and knowledge sharing were higher than the acceptable level among medical students. In addition, the results of Pearson’s correlation test indicated a significant positive relationship between technology acceptance (and its components) and knowledge sharing. In addition, SEM showed that technology acceptance is a significant positive predictor of knowledge sharing among students. Among different components of technology acceptance, only perceived usefulness (PU) and facilitating conditions (FC) were significant predictors of knowledge collecting (P = 0.37 and 0.28, respectively). Nevertheless, other components of technology acceptance could not predict different types of knowledge sharing. Conclusions: The present results showed that PU and FC could predict the knowledge sharing of students more than other components. To improve knowledge sharing in the context of higher medical education, different aspects of technology acceptance need to be evaluated and expanded; accordingly, establishment of new educational policies is necessary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术接受度对设拉子医科大学学生知识共享的预测作用
背景:今天,利用新技术在大学生和教师之间共享知识和信息是很重要的。因此,有必要确定影响大学生知识共享的因素。目的:本研究的主要目的是探讨技术接受度在改善伊朗设拉子医学院学生之间知识共享方面的作用。方法:在本应用研究中,采用描述性分析横断面研究。研究样本包括设拉子医科大学的228名医科学生。数据收集工具包括两份问卷,即技术接受(Toe, 2011)和知识共享(Van den Hoof & Van Weenen, 2004)问卷。这些量表在形式和内容上的有效性由该领域的专家进行了检验,并通过测量Cronbach 's alpha系数来证实它们的可靠性。技术接受问卷和知识共享问卷的信度分别为0.83和0.72。在确认问卷的效度和信度后,将问卷分发给参与者。最后,使用SPSS软件中的单样本t检验和Pearson相关系数检验以及Lisrel 8.8软件中的结构方程建模(SEM)对收集到的数据进行分析。结果:单样本t检验结果显示,医学生的技术接受水平和知识共享水平均高于可接受水平。此外,Pearson相关检验的结果表明,技术接受(及其组成部分)与知识共享之间存在显著的正相关关系。此外,扫描电镜显示,技术接受度是学生之间知识共享的显著正向预测因子。在技术接受的不同成分中,只有感知有用性(PU)和便利条件(FC)是知识收集的显著预测因子(P分别= 0.37和0.28)。然而,技术接受的其他组成部分不能预测不同类型的知识共享。结论:PU和FC比其他成分更能预测学生的知识共享。为了改善高等医学教育背景下的知识共享,需要评估和扩大技术接受的不同方面;因此,有必要制定新的教育政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Consistency Between the Students’ Scores Using Bayesian Intraclass Correlation Coefficient in Postgraduate Students of Kerman University of Medical Sciences in 2013 - 2015 The Relationship of Happiness and Quality of Educational Services with Academic Burnout Among Students of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran A Study of Courses Related to Drug Abuse Prevention in Medical Sciences Curriculum in Iran Lack of Clinical Leadership Competency in Continuing Education Web-Based Learning in Internal Medicine: The First Step in Electronic Clinical Education of the Department of Internal Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1