Senses of Truth and Journalism’s Epistemic Crisis

IF 0.9 3区 哲学 Q3 COMMUNICATION Journal of Media Ethics Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/23736992.2022.2107523
Perry Parks
{"title":"Senses of Truth and Journalism’s Epistemic Crisis","authors":"Perry Parks","doi":"10.1080/23736992.2022.2107523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Journalists’ and publics’ relationship with truth-telling is so messy because the term “truth” holds multitudes of competing senses that are rarely acknowledged in journalism discourse. People approach contested subjects from many, sometimes incommensurate, senses of truth. When journalists fail to identify the competing senses embedded in varying truth claims, they reproduce confusion as to the validity and verifiability of such claims and contribute to a rolling epistemic crisis in the public sphere. This essay explores six senses of truth – logical, empirical, affective, ideological, authoritarian, and narrative – and discusses their interaction and problematic conflation.","PeriodicalId":45979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2022.2107523","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Journalists’ and publics’ relationship with truth-telling is so messy because the term “truth” holds multitudes of competing senses that are rarely acknowledged in journalism discourse. People approach contested subjects from many, sometimes incommensurate, senses of truth. When journalists fail to identify the competing senses embedded in varying truth claims, they reproduce confusion as to the validity and verifiability of such claims and contribute to a rolling epistemic crisis in the public sphere. This essay explores six senses of truth – logical, empirical, affective, ideological, authoritarian, and narrative – and discusses their interaction and problematic conflation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真实感与新闻的认知危机
记者和公众与真相的关系是如此混乱,因为“真相”一词包含了许多相互竞争的含义,而这些含义在新闻话语中很少得到承认。人们从许多(有时是不相称的)真理的角度来看待有争议的话题。当记者无法识别不同真相声明中所包含的相互竞争的感觉时,他们就会对这些声明的有效性和可验证性产生困惑,并导致公共领域不断发生认知危机。本文探讨了真理的六种感觉——逻辑的、经验的、情感的、意识形态的、权威的和叙事的——并讨论了它们的相互作用和有问题的合并。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Moral Identity Development Among Emerging Adults in Media: A Longitudinal Analysis In Defense of Journalism and Presidential Debates From Classroom to Global Discourse: New Resources for Media Ethics Character Skepticism and the Virtuous Journalist Inside the Ivory Tower: How Student Journalists Reason About Ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1