Influence of Cardiologists’ Demographic Profile on Overall Satisfaction Towards Marketing Mix Strategies

J. Sultana, M. Saifuddin, Zakir Hossain Bhuiyan
{"title":"Influence of Cardiologists’ Demographic Profile on Overall Satisfaction Towards Marketing Mix Strategies","authors":"J. Sultana, M. Saifuddin, Zakir Hossain Bhuiyan","doi":"10.3329/dujps.v21i2.63121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate the influence of cardiologists’ demographic characteristics on their satisfaction towards marketing mix strategies (MMS) employed by pharmaceutical industries in Bangladesh. Cardiologists (156) were asked to rate the importance of variables of MMS indicating their degree of agreement with satisfaction statement using a 5-point Likert scale. The variables of marketing mix (4Ps) that can be ranked as top 5 out of 14 variables according to their Spearman correlation coefficients are - brand image (r = 0.532); selling skill of medical representatives (r = 0.507), place of retail pharmacy (r = 0.484), promotional policies (r = 0.476) and continuous medical education program for doctors (r = 0.345). Though the overall mean satisfaction score of females (M = 4.06, SD = 0.87) is higher than that of male (M=3.84, SD =1.02), the difference is not significant; p = 0.260, Cohen’s d = 0.217 showed the effect is small. Experience above 10 years was labeled as high (41%), otherwise low (59%). Experience had substantial influence on perceived satisfaction towards promotion. Finally, overall satisfaction scores varied based on academic qualification of cardiologists; p < 0.05, and Eta-squared = 0.068 implies medium effect. The highest overall satisfaction score was attained for D. Card and others (M = 4.32, SD = 0.82) and the lowest is for MD (M = 3.57, SD =10.9). Cardiologists’ satisfaction score towards product (the lowest is for MD and the highest is for D. Card and others); p < 0.05; Eta-squared = 0.05 (small effect) and promotion (the lowest is for MBBS and the highest is for D. Card and others) vary significantly according to their academic qualification, p < 0.05; Eta-squared = 0.095 implies medium effect.\nDhaka Univ. J. Pharm. Sci. 21(2): 205-215, 2022 (December)","PeriodicalId":11304,"journal":{"name":"Dhaka University Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dhaka University Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/dujps.v21i2.63121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the influence of cardiologists’ demographic characteristics on their satisfaction towards marketing mix strategies (MMS) employed by pharmaceutical industries in Bangladesh. Cardiologists (156) were asked to rate the importance of variables of MMS indicating their degree of agreement with satisfaction statement using a 5-point Likert scale. The variables of marketing mix (4Ps) that can be ranked as top 5 out of 14 variables according to their Spearman correlation coefficients are - brand image (r = 0.532); selling skill of medical representatives (r = 0.507), place of retail pharmacy (r = 0.484), promotional policies (r = 0.476) and continuous medical education program for doctors (r = 0.345). Though the overall mean satisfaction score of females (M = 4.06, SD = 0.87) is higher than that of male (M=3.84, SD =1.02), the difference is not significant; p = 0.260, Cohen’s d = 0.217 showed the effect is small. Experience above 10 years was labeled as high (41%), otherwise low (59%). Experience had substantial influence on perceived satisfaction towards promotion. Finally, overall satisfaction scores varied based on academic qualification of cardiologists; p < 0.05, and Eta-squared = 0.068 implies medium effect. The highest overall satisfaction score was attained for D. Card and others (M = 4.32, SD = 0.82) and the lowest is for MD (M = 3.57, SD =10.9). Cardiologists’ satisfaction score towards product (the lowest is for MD and the highest is for D. Card and others); p < 0.05; Eta-squared = 0.05 (small effect) and promotion (the lowest is for MBBS and the highest is for D. Card and others) vary significantly according to their academic qualification, p < 0.05; Eta-squared = 0.095 implies medium effect. Dhaka Univ. J. Pharm. Sci. 21(2): 205-215, 2022 (December)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏病专家的人口统计特征对营销组合策略总体满意度的影响
本研究旨在调查心脏病学家的人口统计学特征对他们对营销组合策略(MMS)的满意度的影响,采用制药行业在孟加拉国。心脏病专家(156)被要求用5分李克特量表对MMS变量的重要性进行评级,表明他们与满意度声明的一致程度。根据Spearman相关系数,在14个变量中可以排在前5位的营销组合(4Ps)变量是——品牌形象(r = 0.532);医疗代表销售技能(r = 0.507)、零售药房地点(r = 0.484)、促销政策(r = 0.476)、医生继续医学教育计划(r = 0.345)。虽然女性的总体平均满意度得分(M= 4.06, SD = 0.87)高于男性(M=3.84, SD =1.02),但差异不显著;p = 0.260, Cohen’s d = 0.217表明影响较小。10年以上的工作经验被认为是高的(41%),否则是低的(59%)。经验对晋升的感知满意度有实质性的影响。最后,总体满意度得分因心脏病专家的学术资格而异;p < 0.05, Eta-squared = 0.068,说明中效。总体满意度得分最高的是D. Card等(M = 4.32, SD = 0.82),最低的是MD (M = 3.57, SD =10.9)。心脏病专家对产品的满意度得分(MD最低,D. Card等最高);P < 0.05;Eta-squared = 0.05(效应小)和晋升(MBBS最低,D. Card等最高)因学历不同而差异显著,p < 0.05;方差= 0.095表示中等效应。达卡大学药学院。科学21(2):205- 215,2022(12月)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design, Optimization and In vitro Evaluation of Mesalazine 400 mg Delayed Release Tablet for Colon Specific Delivery Formulation and Evaluation of Ledipasvir Nano-suspension Through QbD Approach Anti-viral Activity of 62 Medicinal Plants, Herbs and Spices Available in Bangladesh: A Mini Review In vitro and In vivo Interaction of Ketorolac Tromethamine and Cefixime Trihydrate Isolation and Characterization of Alkaline Proteases Producing Indigenous Bacillus sp. as a Source of Thrombolytic and Fibrinolytic Agents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1