Neural α Oscillations and Pupil Size Differentially Index Cognitive Demand under Competing Audiovisual Task Conditions

Frauke Kraus, Sarah Tune, J. Obleser, Björn Herrmann
{"title":"Neural α Oscillations and Pupil Size Differentially Index Cognitive Demand under Competing Audiovisual Task Conditions","authors":"Frauke Kraus, Sarah Tune, J. Obleser, Björn Herrmann","doi":"10.1101/2022.11.25.517931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive demand is thought to modulate two often used, but rarely combined, measures: pupil size and neural α (8–12 Hz) oscillatory power. However, it is unclear whether these two measures capture cognitive demand in a similar way under complex audiovisual-task conditions. Here we recorded pupil size and neural α power (using electroencephalography), while human participants of both sexes concurrently performed a visual multiple object-tracking task and an auditory gap detection task. Difficulties of the two tasks were manipulated independent of each other. Participants' performance decreased in accuracy and speed with increasing cognitive demand. Pupil size increased with increasing difficulty for both the auditory and the visual task. In contrast, α power showed diverging neural dynamics: parietal α power decreased with increasing difficulty in the visual task, but not with increasing difficulty in the auditory task. Furthermore, independent of task difficulty, within-participant trial-by-trial fluctuations in pupil size were negatively correlated with α power. Difficulty-induced changes in pupil size and α power, however, did not correlate, which is consistent with their different cognitive-demand sensitivities. Overall, the current study demonstrates that the dynamics of the neurophysiological indices of cognitive demand and associated effort are multifaceted and potentially modality-dependent under complex audiovisual-task conditions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Pupil size and oscillatory α power are associated with cognitive demand and effort, but their relative sensitivity under complex audiovisual-task conditions is unclear, as is the extent to which they share underlying mechanisms. Using an audiovisual dual-task paradigm, we show that pupil size increases with increasing cognitive demands for both audition and vision. In contrast, changes in oscillatory α power depend on the respective task demands: parietal α power decreases with visual demand but not with auditory task demand. Hence, pupil size and α power show different sensitivity to cognitive demands, perhaps suggesting partly different underlying neural mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":22786,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"36 1","pages":"4352 - 4364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.25.517931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Cognitive demand is thought to modulate two often used, but rarely combined, measures: pupil size and neural α (8–12 Hz) oscillatory power. However, it is unclear whether these two measures capture cognitive demand in a similar way under complex audiovisual-task conditions. Here we recorded pupil size and neural α power (using electroencephalography), while human participants of both sexes concurrently performed a visual multiple object-tracking task and an auditory gap detection task. Difficulties of the two tasks were manipulated independent of each other. Participants' performance decreased in accuracy and speed with increasing cognitive demand. Pupil size increased with increasing difficulty for both the auditory and the visual task. In contrast, α power showed diverging neural dynamics: parietal α power decreased with increasing difficulty in the visual task, but not with increasing difficulty in the auditory task. Furthermore, independent of task difficulty, within-participant trial-by-trial fluctuations in pupil size were negatively correlated with α power. Difficulty-induced changes in pupil size and α power, however, did not correlate, which is consistent with their different cognitive-demand sensitivities. Overall, the current study demonstrates that the dynamics of the neurophysiological indices of cognitive demand and associated effort are multifaceted and potentially modality-dependent under complex audiovisual-task conditions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Pupil size and oscillatory α power are associated with cognitive demand and effort, but their relative sensitivity under complex audiovisual-task conditions is unclear, as is the extent to which they share underlying mechanisms. Using an audiovisual dual-task paradigm, we show that pupil size increases with increasing cognitive demands for both audition and vision. In contrast, changes in oscillatory α power depend on the respective task demands: parietal α power decreases with visual demand but not with auditory task demand. Hence, pupil size and α power show different sensitivity to cognitive demands, perhaps suggesting partly different underlying neural mechanisms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
竞争性视听任务条件下神经α振荡和瞳孔大小差异指示认知需求
认知需求被认为可以调节瞳孔大小和神经α(8-12赫兹)振荡功率这两个经常使用但很少结合使用的测量指标。然而,在复杂的视听任务条件下,这两种测量方法是否以相似的方式捕捉认知需求尚不清楚。在此研究中,我们记录了瞳孔大小和神经α功率(使用脑电图),而男性和女性参与者同时执行视觉多目标跟踪任务和听觉间隙检测任务。这两项任务的难度是相互独立的。随着认知需求的增加,参与者的表现在准确性和速度上有所下降。瞳孔大小随着听觉和视觉任务难度的增加而增加。相比之下,α功率表现出分化的神经动力学特征:顶叶α功率随视觉任务难度的增加而降低,而不随听觉任务难度的增加而降低。此外,独立于任务难度,受试者内部的瞳孔大小波动与α幂呈负相关。然而,困难引起的瞳孔大小和α能力的变化并不相关,这与他们不同的认知需求敏感性是一致的。总的来说,目前的研究表明,在复杂的视听任务条件下,认知需求和相关努力的神经生理指标的动态是多方面的,并且可能依赖于模式。瞳孔大小和振荡α功率与认知需求和努力有关,但它们在复杂视听任务条件下的相对敏感性尚不清楚,它们共享潜在机制的程度也不清楚。使用视听双任务范式,我们发现瞳孔大小随着听觉和视觉认知需求的增加而增加。相反,振荡α功率的变化依赖于各自的任务需求:顶叶α功率随视觉任务需求而降低,而不随听觉任务需求而降低。因此,瞳孔大小和α能量对认知需求表现出不同的敏感性,这可能部分暗示了不同的潜在神经机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Schlüter et al., “Rabphilin Knock-Out Mice Reveal That Rabphilin Is Not Required for Rab3 Function in Regulating Neurotransmitter Release” Category-selective representation of relationships in visual cortex Phosphorylation of RPT6 controls its ability to bind DNA and regulate gene expression in the hippocampus of male rats during memory formation Neural network connectivity following opioid dependence is altered by a common genetic variant in the mu-opioid receptor,OPRM1A118G An Ascending Excitatory Circuit from the Dorsal Raphe for Sensory Modulation of Pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1