ANALYSIS OF ACCOUNTING STUDENT'S UNDERSTANDING OF BASIC ACCOUNTING CONCEPTS

Ladzina Shafira Zahra, Audita Setiawan
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF ACCOUNTING STUDENT'S UNDERSTANDING OF BASIC ACCOUNTING CONCEPTS","authors":"Ladzina Shafira Zahra, Audita Setiawan","doi":"10.32897/sobat3.2021.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to empirically prove the differences in understanding. The formulation of the problem is to empirically prove whether there are differences in the understanding of students from high school with a science major and high school majoring in social studies on the basic concepts of accounting. The basic concept of accounting in this study uses the variables of assets, liabilities, and capital. This research was conducted at a private university in West Java. The data is primary data, and the data collection technique is using a questionnaire. The population and sample in this study were 52 students majoring in accounting for the 2019-2020 class based on certain criteria. The data analysis technique of this research is descriptive statistical analysis, using validity, reliability and Kruskal Wallis difference test with IBM SPSS Statistics version 23 to measure the level of understanding of students from high school majoring in science and high school majoring in social studies on the basic concepts of accounting. The results of this study stated that only the variable Capital (Equity) had a significant difference in understanding between students from high school majoring in science and high school majoring in social studies. Where the other two variables, namely Assets and Liabilities, show that there is no significant difference in understanding between students from Senior High School from the Science Department and Senior High School from the Social Sciences Department.","PeriodicalId":20621,"journal":{"name":"Prosiding Seminar Sosial Politik, Bisnis, Akuntansi dan Teknik (SoBAT) ke-3","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosiding Seminar Sosial Politik, Bisnis, Akuntansi dan Teknik (SoBAT) ke-3","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32897/sobat3.2021.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to empirically prove the differences in understanding. The formulation of the problem is to empirically prove whether there are differences in the understanding of students from high school with a science major and high school majoring in social studies on the basic concepts of accounting. The basic concept of accounting in this study uses the variables of assets, liabilities, and capital. This research was conducted at a private university in West Java. The data is primary data, and the data collection technique is using a questionnaire. The population and sample in this study were 52 students majoring in accounting for the 2019-2020 class based on certain criteria. The data analysis technique of this research is descriptive statistical analysis, using validity, reliability and Kruskal Wallis difference test with IBM SPSS Statistics version 23 to measure the level of understanding of students from high school majoring in science and high school majoring in social studies on the basic concepts of accounting. The results of this study stated that only the variable Capital (Equity) had a significant difference in understanding between students from high school majoring in science and high school majoring in social studies. Where the other two variables, namely Assets and Liabilities, show that there is no significant difference in understanding between students from Senior High School from the Science Department and Senior High School from the Social Sciences Department.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
会计专业学生对会计基本概念的理解情况分析
本研究的目的是实证证明理解上的差异。问题的表述是为了实证证明理科高中学生与社会学高中学生对会计基本概念的理解是否存在差异。本研究中会计的基本概念使用了资产、负债和资本的变量。这项研究是在西爪哇的一所私立大学进行的。数据为原始数据,数据收集技术采用问卷调查法。本研究的人口和样本是根据一定的标准选取的52名2019-2020级会计专业的学生。本研究的数据分析技术为描述性统计分析,采用效度、信度和Kruskal Wallis差异检验,采用IBM SPSS Statistics version 23来衡量高中理科专业学生和高中社会学专业学生对会计基本概念的理解程度。本研究的结果表明,只有变量资本(股权)在高中理科专业学生和高中社会学专业学生的理解上有显著差异。其中,另外两个变量,即资产和负债,表明来自科学系的高中学生和来自社会科学系的高中学生在理解上没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ANALISIS PENGENDALIAN KUALITAS PRODUK DENGAN METODE SEVEN TOOLS (STUDI KASUS LINE ROCKER ARM N2J PT.XXX CIKARANG INDONESIA) REKOMENDASI PEMILIHAN RAKET BULU TANGKIS MENGGUNAKAN METODE PROFILE MATCHING SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING (EAP) SISTEM PELAYANAN ADMINISTRASI DI SMK NEGERI 1 CISARUA PERAN EKONOMI SYARIAH DALAM MEWUJUDKAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT BERBASIS GREEN ECONOMY PENERAPAN ALGORITMA GENETIKA UNTUK OPTIMASI PENJADWALAN LABORATORIUM KOMPUTER FAKULTAS TEKNIK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1