Comparison of Amsel Clinical Criteria with Standard Method of Gram Stain for Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis

Asieh Azadpour Motlagh, M. Dolatian, M. Nasiri, Behrouz Ezatpour, Yadollah Sahranavard, Heshmat Shakiba
{"title":"Comparison of Amsel Clinical Criteria with Standard Method of Gram Stain for Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis","authors":"Asieh Azadpour Motlagh, M. Dolatian, M. Nasiri, Behrouz Ezatpour, Yadollah Sahranavard, Heshmat Shakiba","doi":"10.22038/IJOGI.2018.11970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Bacterial Vaginosis is the most common type of vaginitis in women of reproductive age which is diagnosed by Amsel’s clinical criteria and the Nugent microscopic scoring system (Gram stain). This study was performed with aim to compare Amsel clinical criteria with standard method of Gram stain for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. \nMethods: The experimental study was conducted to compare Amsel's clinical criteria with standard gram stain method for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis on 100 married women referred to women clinics of Khorramabad in 2015-2016. Nugent scoring system was considered as the gold standard method for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of Amsel's criteria was compared with those of the Nugent scoring system. Data was analyzed by SPSS software (version 20). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. \nResults: The mean of age, duration of marriage, age of the first menstruation and first pregnancy were 31.96 ± 8.93, 18.96 ± 3.50, 12.99± 0.85, and 20.03 ± 3.84 years. In the evaluation of diagnostic value of the Nugent scoring system in comparison with the Amsel's criteria, Amsel's criteria had sensitivity 100%, specificity 46%, positive predictive value 92.5%, and negative predictive value of 100%. \nConclusion: Amsel's criteria are not as accurate as the Nugent scoring system in the diagnosis of this infection and Gram staining is needed to correctly diagnose bacterial vaginosis.","PeriodicalId":39154,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility","volume":"146 1","pages":"55-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJOGI.2018.11970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bacterial Vaginosis is the most common type of vaginitis in women of reproductive age which is diagnosed by Amsel’s clinical criteria and the Nugent microscopic scoring system (Gram stain). This study was performed with aim to compare Amsel clinical criteria with standard method of Gram stain for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Methods: The experimental study was conducted to compare Amsel's clinical criteria with standard gram stain method for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis on 100 married women referred to women clinics of Khorramabad in 2015-2016. Nugent scoring system was considered as the gold standard method for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of Amsel's criteria was compared with those of the Nugent scoring system. Data was analyzed by SPSS software (version 20). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean of age, duration of marriage, age of the first menstruation and first pregnancy were 31.96 ± 8.93, 18.96 ± 3.50, 12.99± 0.85, and 20.03 ± 3.84 years. In the evaluation of diagnostic value of the Nugent scoring system in comparison with the Amsel's criteria, Amsel's criteria had sensitivity 100%, specificity 46%, positive predictive value 92.5%, and negative predictive value of 100%. Conclusion: Amsel's criteria are not as accurate as the Nugent scoring system in the diagnosis of this infection and Gram staining is needed to correctly diagnose bacterial vaginosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Amsel临床标准与革兰氏染色法诊断细菌性阴道病的比较
细菌性阴道炎是育龄妇女最常见的阴道炎类型,通过Amsel临床标准和Nugent显微评分系统(革兰氏染色)进行诊断。本研究的目的是比较Amsel临床标准与标准革兰氏染色法诊断细菌性阴道病。方法:对2015-2016年霍拉马巴德妇女诊所转诊的100名已婚妇女进行Amsel临床标准与标准革兰氏染色法诊断细菌性阴道病的比较实验研究。Nugent评分系统被认为是诊断细菌性阴道病的金标准方法。比较Amsel标准与Nugent评分系统的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。数据分析采用SPSS (version 20)软件。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:年龄、婚龄、初潮年龄、初孕年龄分别为31.96±8.93岁、18.96±3.50岁、12.99±0.85岁、20.03±3.84岁。在评价Nugent评分系统与Amsel标准的诊断价值时,Amsel标准的敏感性为100%,特异性为46%,阳性预测值为92.5%,阴性预测值为100%。结论:Amsel的诊断标准不如Nugent评分系统准确,正确诊断细菌性阴道病需要革兰氏染色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and consequences related to sexual violence in perimenopausal women: A systematic review Evaluation of postoperative pain experienced by female candidates for gynecological surgery with lithotomy position " Comparative study of the effect of "Ginger-Lavender" capsule with Mefenamic Acid" on the severity of primary dysmenorrhea, A controlled experimental study Shivering control in women under spinal anesthesia: A reviewed study of the role of anesthetics Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding and its related factors in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1