Human Embryology: Science Politics versus Science Facts

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Quaestiones Disputatae Pub Date : 2015-04-19 DOI:10.5840/QD20155220
M. Condic
{"title":"Human Embryology: Science Politics versus Science Facts","authors":"M. Condic","doi":"10.5840/QD20155220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a scientist, I have written and spoken about the topic of human embryology for many years, and I am continuously reminded of both the mystery surrounding human embryos and of the passionate feelings they evoke. The prenatal origin of human life has fascinated biologists, philosophers, and religious thinkers for a very long time.1 Yet in the modern age, thinking about the earliest stages of human life—and considering the value of life at its very beginning—has become entangled with some of the most emotionally compelling issues society and individuals face, including the bearing of children, the relief of human suffering, and the pursuit of scientific knowledge. For the vast majority of human history, prenatal development has been a profound mystery. A host of folklore, mythology, and religious beliefs have arisen surrounding the origin of human life, but until quite recently, we knew very little for certain beyond the basics that can be readily observed; that after a period of confinement lasting approximately nine months, a baby is brought forth from the mother’s womb with much effort and with considerable risk to both mother and child. Over the last several decades, science has begun to unravel the mysteries of human development. Yet despite these advances in our understanding, in many ways, the true nature of our embryonic origin remains shrouded in darkness, mystery, and controversy. One of the challenges we face in thinking about the human embryo is that embryonic development falls outside every-day human experience. Typically, we formulate our opinions about the world based on what we observe, what we feel about our observations, and what we conclude from these observational and emotional events. We develop an intuitive sense of what things are and how they fit into our lives based on our experiences with them over time. This kind of intuitive understanding allows us to overcome our immediate reactions in favor of what we know to be true overall—even when appearances might beg to differ. For example, many of us, quite understandably, react to human toddlers as members of an alien species. They are louder, messier, and consider-","PeriodicalId":40384,"journal":{"name":"Quaestiones Disputatae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaestiones Disputatae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/QD20155220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As a scientist, I have written and spoken about the topic of human embryology for many years, and I am continuously reminded of both the mystery surrounding human embryos and of the passionate feelings they evoke. The prenatal origin of human life has fascinated biologists, philosophers, and religious thinkers for a very long time.1 Yet in the modern age, thinking about the earliest stages of human life—and considering the value of life at its very beginning—has become entangled with some of the most emotionally compelling issues society and individuals face, including the bearing of children, the relief of human suffering, and the pursuit of scientific knowledge. For the vast majority of human history, prenatal development has been a profound mystery. A host of folklore, mythology, and religious beliefs have arisen surrounding the origin of human life, but until quite recently, we knew very little for certain beyond the basics that can be readily observed; that after a period of confinement lasting approximately nine months, a baby is brought forth from the mother’s womb with much effort and with considerable risk to both mother and child. Over the last several decades, science has begun to unravel the mysteries of human development. Yet despite these advances in our understanding, in many ways, the true nature of our embryonic origin remains shrouded in darkness, mystery, and controversy. One of the challenges we face in thinking about the human embryo is that embryonic development falls outside every-day human experience. Typically, we formulate our opinions about the world based on what we observe, what we feel about our observations, and what we conclude from these observational and emotional events. We develop an intuitive sense of what things are and how they fit into our lives based on our experiences with them over time. This kind of intuitive understanding allows us to overcome our immediate reactions in favor of what we know to be true overall—even when appearances might beg to differ. For example, many of us, quite understandably, react to human toddlers as members of an alien species. They are louder, messier, and consider-
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类胚胎学:科学政治与科学事实
作为一名科学家,我多年来一直在写和讲关于人类胚胎学的话题,我不断地想起围绕着人类胚胎的神秘和它们所唤起的激情。很长一段时间以来,生物学家、哲学家和宗教思想家对人类生命的起源都很感兴趣然而,在现代,思考人类生命的最初阶段,思考生命最初的价值,已经与社会和个人面临的一些最具情感吸引力的问题纠缠在一起,这些问题包括生儿育女、减轻人类痛苦和追求科学知识。在人类历史的大部分时间里,产前发育一直是一个深奥的谜团。围绕人类生命的起源,出现了大量的民间传说、神话和宗教信仰,但直到最近,除了可以轻易观察到的基本知识外,我们所知道的很少;在大约9个月的坐月子期后,婴儿从母亲的子宫里出来,需要付出很大的努力,对母亲和孩子都有相当大的风险。在过去的几十年里,科学已经开始揭开人类发展的奥秘。然而,尽管我们的理解取得了这些进步,但在许多方面,我们胚胎起源的真实本质仍然笼罩在黑暗、神秘和争议之中。我们在思考人类胚胎时面临的挑战之一是胚胎发育超出了人类的日常经验。通常,我们对世界的看法是基于我们的观察,我们对观察的感受,以及我们从这些观察和情感事件中得出的结论。随着时间的推移,我们对事物是什么以及它们如何融入我们的生活产生了一种直觉。这种直观的理解使我们能够克服我们的直接反应,支持我们所知道的整体是正确的——即使外表可能会有所不同。例如,我们中的许多人,完全可以理解,对人类幼儿的反应是外星物种的成员。他们更大声,更混乱,而且考虑
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quaestiones Disputatae
Quaestiones Disputatae HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Remnants of Substances: A Neo-Aristotelian Resolution of the Puzzles After Survivalism and Corruptionism: Separated Souls as Incomplete Persons Evaluating Hylomorphism as a Hybrid Account of Personal Identity Editor’s Introduction Saint Thomas Aquinas and the Too-Many-Thinkers Problem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1