Our Experience in the Surgical Treatment of Chronic Constrictive Pericarditis

E. Likaj, S. Kuçi, S. Dumani, A. Refatllari
{"title":"Our Experience in the Surgical Treatment of Chronic Constrictive Pericarditis","authors":"E. Likaj, S. Kuçi, S. Dumani, A. Refatllari","doi":"10.7176/jmpb/68-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: We reviewed the cases of 21 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for chronic constrictive pericarditis between January 2004 and January 2016, to determine causes, surgical techniques, mortality and morbidity rates, and improvement of functional capacity. Patients and Methods: Eleven of our patients were men (52.3%) and ten were women (47.7%); their average age was 48.71±15.6 years. The pericarditis was tuberculous in 13 patients (61.9%), idiopathic in 4 patients (19%), rheumatic in two patients (9.5%), post surgical in one patient (4.75%) and neoplastic in one patient (4.75%).  Results: In all the cases, our approach was median sternotomy. All anterior pericardium was resected from left phrenic nerve to right phrenic nerve. No patient required cardiopulmonary bypass. We had no early postoperative mortality. In the 1st postoperative month, functional capacity improved dramatically: the number of patients in New York Heart Association functional class IV moved from 13 (preoperatively) to 4; in class III, from 7 to 3; in class II, from 1 to 6; and in class I, from 0 to 10.  Conclusions: We recommend the median sternotomy approach for chronic constrictive pericarditis. Tuberculosis still remains the main cause at our country. It can be treated with excellent results nowadays. Keywords: surgical treatment, chronic constrictive pericarditis DOI: 10.7176/JMPB/68-03 Publication date: September 30 th 2020","PeriodicalId":16339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine, Physiology and Biophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine, Physiology and Biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/jmpb/68-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We reviewed the cases of 21 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for chronic constrictive pericarditis between January 2004 and January 2016, to determine causes, surgical techniques, mortality and morbidity rates, and improvement of functional capacity. Patients and Methods: Eleven of our patients were men (52.3%) and ten were women (47.7%); their average age was 48.71±15.6 years. The pericarditis was tuberculous in 13 patients (61.9%), idiopathic in 4 patients (19%), rheumatic in two patients (9.5%), post surgical in one patient (4.75%) and neoplastic in one patient (4.75%).  Results: In all the cases, our approach was median sternotomy. All anterior pericardium was resected from left phrenic nerve to right phrenic nerve. No patient required cardiopulmonary bypass. We had no early postoperative mortality. In the 1st postoperative month, functional capacity improved dramatically: the number of patients in New York Heart Association functional class IV moved from 13 (preoperatively) to 4; in class III, from 7 to 3; in class II, from 1 to 6; and in class I, from 0 to 10.  Conclusions: We recommend the median sternotomy approach for chronic constrictive pericarditis. Tuberculosis still remains the main cause at our country. It can be treated with excellent results nowadays. Keywords: surgical treatment, chronic constrictive pericarditis DOI: 10.7176/JMPB/68-03 Publication date: September 30 th 2020
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性缩窄性心包炎的外科治疗体会
我们回顾了2004年1月至2016年1月期间连续21例接受手术治疗的慢性缩窄性心包炎患者的病例,以确定病因、手术技术、死亡率和发病率以及功能能力的改善。患者与方法:男性11例(52.3%),女性10例(47.7%);平均年龄48.71±15.6岁。心包炎结核性13例(61.9%),特发性4例(19%),风湿性2例(9.5%),术后1例(4.75%),肿瘤性1例(4.75%)。结果:所有病例均采用胸骨正中切开术。从左膈神经至右膈神经全部切除前心包。没有病人需要体外循环。我们没有术后早期死亡率。术后1个月,功能能力显著改善:纽约心脏协会功能等级IV的患者数量从术前的13例增加到4例;第三类,从7级到3级;第二类,1至6级;在第一类,从0到10。结论:我们推荐胸骨正中切口入路治疗慢性缩窄性心包炎。结核病仍然是我国的主要病因。现在治疗效果很好。关键词:手术治疗,慢性缩窄性心包炎DOI: 10.7176/JMPB/68-03出版日期:2020年9月30日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Undiagnosed Cornual Pregnancy Complicated by Large Uterine Fibroid: A Rare Case Report An Analysis of The Implications of The Use of E-Cigarette or Vaping Products on Adolescence Health How do alterations in epigenetic mechanisms cause intellectual disability? ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE AND PRACTICE TOWARDS HEPATITIS C AMONG CLINICAL MEDICAL STUDENTS OF CHUKWUEMEKA ODIMEGWU OJUKWU UNIVERSITY (COOU), AMAKU, AWKA, ANAMBRA STATE Health and Public Health Implications of COVID-19 in Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1