Evaluation of Transportation Infrastructure: A Case Study of Gold Coast Light Rail Stage 1&2

IF 1.8 Q3 MANAGEMENT Construction Economics and Building Pub Date : 2021-12-02 DOI:10.5130/ajceb.v21i4.7738
C. Langston, Charles Crowley
{"title":"Evaluation of Transportation Infrastructure: A Case Study of Gold Coast Light Rail Stage 1&2","authors":"C. Langston, Charles Crowley","doi":"10.5130/ajceb.v21i4.7738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, there has been increased reliance on new infrastructure projects to counter economic fallout and underpin employment security. Urban and inter-urban transportation projects, such as major road, rail and port facilities, are popular choices for national and state governments in Australia as they provide broad fiscal support across all sectors of the economy. The problem with stimulus is making sure that the quality of the new infrastructure provides collective utility to a community or region. Whether the benefits will be worthwhile and represent best use of resource inputs requires financial, social, ethical and environmental consequences to be evaluated in a comparable format. The aim in this paper is to analyse the Gold Coast Light Rail (GCLR) Stage 1&2 project using a method that is capable of merging tangible and intangible criteria using an ordinal ranking algorithm. While the GCLR case study is undertaken with the benefit of hindsight, normally these types of evaluations are performed in real time as a project progresses from initiation (design) to implementation (deliver) and influence (delight). The method adopted in this study represents a modern form of multi-criteria decision-making, which enables successful projects to be distinguished from unsuccessful ones using a time period from commencement until one full year of operation has occurred. The i3d3 model, developed by a team from Bond University, has the unique benefit of ranking projects from best to worst across an organisational portfolio, geographic region or industry sector. It also supports past project performance to inform new design through application of a continuous improvement process of recording lessons learned. The GCLR case study calculated 100% of the critical success factors in the model to be positive and produced an overall success ranking of 23 (on a scale of -100 to +100). This paper presents the approach taken to evaluate GCLR’s level of success and the calculations that took place to reach this finding. This is the first time i3d3 has been used on an Australian project.","PeriodicalId":51729,"journal":{"name":"Construction Economics and Building","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Economics and Building","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5130/ajceb.v21i4.7738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, there has been increased reliance on new infrastructure projects to counter economic fallout and underpin employment security. Urban and inter-urban transportation projects, such as major road, rail and port facilities, are popular choices for national and state governments in Australia as they provide broad fiscal support across all sectors of the economy. The problem with stimulus is making sure that the quality of the new infrastructure provides collective utility to a community or region. Whether the benefits will be worthwhile and represent best use of resource inputs requires financial, social, ethical and environmental consequences to be evaluated in a comparable format. The aim in this paper is to analyse the Gold Coast Light Rail (GCLR) Stage 1&2 project using a method that is capable of merging tangible and intangible criteria using an ordinal ranking algorithm. While the GCLR case study is undertaken with the benefit of hindsight, normally these types of evaluations are performed in real time as a project progresses from initiation (design) to implementation (deliver) and influence (delight). The method adopted in this study represents a modern form of multi-criteria decision-making, which enables successful projects to be distinguished from unsuccessful ones using a time period from commencement until one full year of operation has occurred. The i3d3 model, developed by a team from Bond University, has the unique benefit of ranking projects from best to worst across an organisational portfolio, geographic region or industry sector. It also supports past project performance to inform new design through application of a continuous improvement process of recording lessons learned. The GCLR case study calculated 100% of the critical success factors in the model to be positive and produced an overall success ranking of 23 (on a scale of -100 to +100). This paper presents the approach taken to evaluate GCLR’s level of success and the calculations that took place to reach this finding. This is the first time i3d3 has been used on an Australian project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交通基础设施评价:以黄金海岸轻轨一期和二期为例
自2019冠状病毒病大流行开始以来,人们越来越依赖新的基础设施项目来应对经济影响并巩固就业保障。城市和城市间交通项目,如主要公路、铁路和港口设施,是澳大利亚国家和州政府的热门选择,因为它们为所有经济部门提供了广泛的财政支持。刺激计划的问题在于确保新基础设施的质量为社区或地区提供集体效用。这些利益是否值得并代表了资源投入的最佳利用,需要以可比的形式评价财政、社会、道德和环境后果。本文的目的是分析黄金海岸轻轨(GCLR)第1和第2阶段项目,使用一种能够使用有序排序算法合并有形和无形标准的方法。虽然GCLR案例研究是在事后进行的,但通常这些类型的评估是在项目从启动(设计)到实现(交付)和影响(愉悦)的过程中实时执行的。本研究中采用的方法代表了一种现代形式的多标准决策,它使成功的项目与不成功的项目区分开来,使用的时间段从开始到运行一整年。由邦德大学(Bond University)的一个团队开发的i3d3模型具有独特的优势,可以根据组织组合、地理区域或行业领域对项目进行从好到坏的排名。它还支持过去的项目表现,通过应用持续改进过程来记录经验教训,从而为新的设计提供信息。GCLR案例研究计算出模型中100%的关键成功因素为正,并产生了23的总体成功排名(在-100到+100的范围内)。本文介绍了评估GCLR成功水平的方法,以及为达到这一发现而进行的计算。这是i3d3首次在澳大利亚的项目中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Construction Economics and Building (formerly known as the Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building [AJCEB]) is a peer reviewed, open access publication for original research into all aspects of the economics and management of building and construction, quantity surveying and property management as well as construction and property education. It is free for authors, readers and libraries.
期刊最新文献
The Institutional Field Of Learning From Project-Related Failures – Opportunities and Challenges. Framework for Evaluating the Success of Integrated Project Delivery in the Industrial Construction Sector: A Mixed Methods Approach & Machine Learning Application Success Factors of the Consultant Selection Stage of the Ghanaian Public Construction Projects: The Road Sector’s Perspective Roofing Distributor Employee Perception: Workforce Attraction/Retention and Need Adopting qualitative data in conceptual system dynamic modelling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1