Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and distinguishing features of effective policies – an evidence-based approach

IF 3.3 1区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS Entrepreneurship and Regional Development Pub Date : 2022-03-06 DOI:10.1080/08985626.2022.2045634
J. Candeias, Soumodip Sarkar
{"title":"Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and distinguishing features of effective policies – an evidence-based approach","authors":"J. Candeias, Soumodip Sarkar","doi":"10.1080/08985626.2022.2045634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A generalized belief in entrepreneurship as a source of economic growth ensures sustained interest in the entrepreneurial ecosystem (EE) concept, capturing the attention of governments and regional authorities. This has generated a plethora of public policies aimed at creating and developing EEs, frequently without solid theoretical and empirical foundations for its design, with consequent policies risking being ineffective. To address this, we develop theory through a systematic synthesis of qualitative studies, exploring a set of EEs, from different countries, dimensions, and characteristics. Our evidence-based approach diverges from extant studies that frequently examine a single ecosystem. The results of the systematic synthesis led us to propose a typology of ideal-types of intervention, the ecologist, the creator, the promoter and the landscaper. These provide a path towards the development of a better understanding of the type of dominant policy intervention in EE, also enabling the study of policy evolution and its alternative trajectories regarding future development. By using an evidence-based analysis, we enhance coherence through incorporating diverse perspectives not as conflicting or contradictory, but as part of a structured set of policymaking options. This sets a basis for future research, especially related to the evolution process, and provide evidence-based advice for practitioners.","PeriodicalId":54210,"journal":{"name":"Entrepreneurship and Regional Development","volume":"56 1","pages":"343 - 375"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entrepreneurship and Regional Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2022.2045634","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT A generalized belief in entrepreneurship as a source of economic growth ensures sustained interest in the entrepreneurial ecosystem (EE) concept, capturing the attention of governments and regional authorities. This has generated a plethora of public policies aimed at creating and developing EEs, frequently without solid theoretical and empirical foundations for its design, with consequent policies risking being ineffective. To address this, we develop theory through a systematic synthesis of qualitative studies, exploring a set of EEs, from different countries, dimensions, and characteristics. Our evidence-based approach diverges from extant studies that frequently examine a single ecosystem. The results of the systematic synthesis led us to propose a typology of ideal-types of intervention, the ecologist, the creator, the promoter and the landscaper. These provide a path towards the development of a better understanding of the type of dominant policy intervention in EE, also enabling the study of policy evolution and its alternative trajectories regarding future development. By using an evidence-based analysis, we enhance coherence through incorporating diverse perspectives not as conflicting or contradictory, but as part of a structured set of policymaking options. This sets a basis for future research, especially related to the evolution process, and provide evidence-based advice for practitioners.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创业生态系统和有效政策的显著特征——基于证据的方法
普遍认为创业是经济增长的源泉,这确保了人们对创业生态系统(EE)概念的持续兴趣,吸引了政府和地区当局的注意。这就产生了大量旨在创造和发展环境经济的公共政策,这些政策的设计往往缺乏坚实的理论和经验基础,因此政策有可能无效。为了解决这个问题,我们通过系统地综合定性研究来发展理论,探索一系列来自不同国家、不同维度和不同特征的环境评价。我们的循证方法与现有的研究不同,这些研究经常检查单个生态系统。系统综合的结果使我们提出了一种理想类型的干预类型,生态学家,创造者,推动者和景观设计师。这为更好地理解情感表达中主导政策干预的类型提供了一条道路,也使研究政策演变及其未来发展的替代轨迹成为可能。通过基于证据的分析,我们将不同的观点纳入一套结构化的决策方案,而不是相互冲突或矛盾,从而增强了一致性。这为未来的研究,特别是与进化过程相关的研究奠定了基础,并为从业者提供了基于证据的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Entrepreneurship and Regional Development is unique in that it addresses the central factors in economic development - entrepreneurial vitality and innovation - as local and regional phenomena. It provides a multi-disciplinary forum for researchers and practitioners in the field of entrepreneurship and small firm development and for those studying and developing the local and regional context in which entrepreneurs emerge, innovate and establish the new economic activities which drive economic growth and create new economic wealth and employment. The Journal focuses on the diverse and complex characteristics of local and regional economies which lead to entrepreneurial vitality and endow the large and small firms within them with international competitiveness.
期刊最新文献
Back to work? How employers perceive applicants’ experience of entrepreneurial failure Exploring the impact of regional characteristics on social incubators’ mission, structure and activity: a contingency perspective Resilience and digitally-advanced entrepreneurship An Entrepreneurship-as-practice perspective of next-generation becoming family businesses successors: the role of discursive artefacts How small firms build resilience to ward off crises: a paradox perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1