Identifying root causes of conflicts at farm level and conflicts resolution strategies in Punjab, Pakistan

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences International Journal of Agricultural Extension Pub Date : 2021-06-26 DOI:10.33687/ijae.009.02.3427
Sohaib Usman, A. Saghir, K. M. Ch., R. Kousar, R. Ullah
{"title":"Identifying root causes of conflicts at farm level and conflicts resolution strategies in Punjab, Pakistan","authors":"Sohaib Usman, A. Saghir, K. M. Ch., R. Kousar, R. Ullah","doi":"10.33687/ijae.009.02.3427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study was conducted in three districts of the Punjab province. Muzaffargarh district from southern Punjab, Gujranwala district from center, and Attock district from North were selected randomly from three different zones (South, North, and Central Punjab) of Punjab, Pakistan. In each district, 200 farm families (100 male and 100 female) were selected purposively (involved in the conflict) for data collection rationally with help of key informants hence the total sample size was 600 in three selected districts. A well-planned and well-structured interview schedule was prepared for the collection of data. Two focus group discussions were planned for an in-depth discussion in each district. Each focus group consisted of 8 to10 members. Results indicate that passageway among agricultural land (x̄= 3.73), water distribution at farm level (x̄= 3.64), crop destroyed by the animals (x̄= 3.47), and burning of crops (x̄= 3.34) were the major causes of conflicts at the farm level as perceived by the respondents. Wastage of money and time (x̄= 3.74), affects daily routine life (x̄= 3.72), affects child education (x̄= 3.63), affects the marriage of the family members (x̄= 3.52) and less farm production (x̄= 3.32) and family break up (x̄= 3.27) were the consequences of farm-level conflicts. Participation of elder family member (x̄=3.69/5.00), negotiation among the conflicted parties (x̄=3.49/5.00), use of local politicians (x̄=3.41/5.00), social relationship (x̄=3.35/5.00), involvement of informal judiciary (panchayat) (x̄=3.20/5.00) were the modalities used by the local communities for conflicts resolution as perceived by the respondents. It was recommended that local panchayat and local administrative bodies should be promoted in the conflict management process.","PeriodicalId":52390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agricultural Extension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agricultural Extension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33687/ijae.009.02.3427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study was conducted in three districts of the Punjab province. Muzaffargarh district from southern Punjab, Gujranwala district from center, and Attock district from North were selected randomly from three different zones (South, North, and Central Punjab) of Punjab, Pakistan. In each district, 200 farm families (100 male and 100 female) were selected purposively (involved in the conflict) for data collection rationally with help of key informants hence the total sample size was 600 in three selected districts. A well-planned and well-structured interview schedule was prepared for the collection of data. Two focus group discussions were planned for an in-depth discussion in each district. Each focus group consisted of 8 to10 members. Results indicate that passageway among agricultural land (x̄= 3.73), water distribution at farm level (x̄= 3.64), crop destroyed by the animals (x̄= 3.47), and burning of crops (x̄= 3.34) were the major causes of conflicts at the farm level as perceived by the respondents. Wastage of money and time (x̄= 3.74), affects daily routine life (x̄= 3.72), affects child education (x̄= 3.63), affects the marriage of the family members (x̄= 3.52) and less farm production (x̄= 3.32) and family break up (x̄= 3.27) were the consequences of farm-level conflicts. Participation of elder family member (x̄=3.69/5.00), negotiation among the conflicted parties (x̄=3.49/5.00), use of local politicians (x̄=3.41/5.00), social relationship (x̄=3.35/5.00), involvement of informal judiciary (panchayat) (x̄=3.20/5.00) were the modalities used by the local communities for conflicts resolution as perceived by the respondents. It was recommended that local panchayat and local administrative bodies should be promoted in the conflict management process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在巴基斯坦旁遮普确定农场层面冲突的根源和冲突解决战略
本研究是在旁遮普省的三个地区进行的。从巴基斯坦旁遮普省南部的Muzaffargarh区、中部的Gujranwala区和北部的Attock区随机抽取三个不同地区(旁遮普省南部、北部和中部)。在每个地区,有目的地选择200个农户(男100户,女100户)(涉及冲突),在关键举报人的帮助下合理收集数据,三个地区的总样本量为600人。为了收集数据,我们准备了一份计划周密、结构合理的面试时间表。计划在每个地区进行两次焦点小组讨论,以便进行深入讨论。每个焦点小组由8至10名成员组成。结果表明,农用地之间的通道(x ā = 3.73)、农场层面的水资源分配(x ā = 3.64)、被动物破坏的作物(x ā = 3.47)和焚烧作物(x ā = 3.34)是受访者认为农场层面冲突的主要原因。浪费金钱和时间(x ā = 3.74),影响日常生活(x ā = 3.72),影响儿童教育(x ā = 3.63),影响家庭成员的婚姻(x ā = 3.52),减少农业生产(x ā = 3.32)和家庭破裂(x ā = 3.27)是农场层面冲突的后果。受访者认为,年长家庭成员的参与(x ā =3.69/5.00)、冲突各方之间的谈判(x ā =3.49/5.00)、利用当地政治家(x ā =3.41/5.00)、社会关系(x ā =3.35/5.00)、非正式司法机构(panchayat)的参与(x ā =3.20/5.00)是当地社区解决冲突的方式。会议建议在冲突管理过程中促进地方村务委员会和地方行政机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Agricultural Extension
International Journal of Agricultural Extension Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Influence of cultural norms and traditions on food insecurity among small-scale farmers in marmanet ward, laikipia county, Kenya Youths as recipients and providers of agriculture information – the vertical vegetable gardening case in Busia County, Kenya Effect of excessive use of agrochemicals on farming practices: Bangladesh perspectives Mediator factorial model of social entrepreneurship in the covid-19 era The covid-19 pandemic effect to livelihood strategy adaptation of rubber smallholding household: a case study in Songkhla province, the southern Thailand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1