Volume doubling time and radiomic features predict tumor behavior of screen-detected lung cancers.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Biomarkers Pub Date : 2022-04-18 DOI:10.3233/cbm-210194
J. Pérez-Morales, Hong Lu, W. Mu, I. Tunali, T. Kutuk, S. Eschrich, Y. Balagurunathan, R. Gillies, M. Schabath
{"title":"Volume doubling time and radiomic features predict tumor behavior of screen-detected lung cancers.","authors":"J. Pérez-Morales, Hong Lu, W. Mu, I. Tunali, T. Kutuk, S. Eschrich, Y. Balagurunathan, R. Gillies, M. Schabath","doi":"10.3233/cbm-210194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nImage-based biomarkers could have translational implications by characterizing tumor behavior of lung cancers diagnosed during lung cancer screening. In this study, peritumoral and intratumoral radiomics and volume doubling time (VDT) were used to identify high-risk subsets of lung patients diagnosed in lung cancer screening that are associated with poor survival outcomes.\n\n\nMETHODS\nData and images were acquired from the National Lung Screening Trial. VDT was calculated between two consequent screening intervals approximately 1 year apart; peritumoral and intratumoral radiomics were extracted from the baseline screen. Overall survival (OS) was the main endpoint. Classification and Regression Tree analyses identified the most predictive covariates to classify patient outcomes.\n\n\nRESULTS\nDecision tree analysis stratified patients into three risk-groups (low, intermediate, and high) based on VDT and one radiomic feature (compactness). High-risk patients had extremely poor survival outcomes (hazard ratio [HR] = 8.15; 25% 5-year OS) versus low-risk patients (HR = 1.00; 83.3% 5-year OS). Among early-stage lung cancers, high-risk patients had poor survival outcomes (HR = 9.07; 44.4% 5-year OS) versus the low-risk group (HR = 1.00; 90.9% 5-year OS). For VDT, the decision tree analysis identified a novel cut-point of 279 days and using this cut-point VDT alone discriminated between aggressive (HR = 4.18; 45% 5-year OS) versus indolent/low-risk cancers (HR = 1.00; 82.8% 5-year OS).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nWe utilized peritumoral and intratumoral radiomic features and VDT to generate a model that identify a high-risk group of screen-detected lung cancers associated with poor survival outcomes. These vulnerable subset of screen-detected lung cancers may be candidates for more aggressive surveillance/follow-up and treatment, such as adjuvant therapy.","PeriodicalId":56320,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Biomarkers","volume":"36 1","pages":"489-501"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/cbm-210194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

BACKGROUND Image-based biomarkers could have translational implications by characterizing tumor behavior of lung cancers diagnosed during lung cancer screening. In this study, peritumoral and intratumoral radiomics and volume doubling time (VDT) were used to identify high-risk subsets of lung patients diagnosed in lung cancer screening that are associated with poor survival outcomes. METHODS Data and images were acquired from the National Lung Screening Trial. VDT was calculated between two consequent screening intervals approximately 1 year apart; peritumoral and intratumoral radiomics were extracted from the baseline screen. Overall survival (OS) was the main endpoint. Classification and Regression Tree analyses identified the most predictive covariates to classify patient outcomes. RESULTS Decision tree analysis stratified patients into three risk-groups (low, intermediate, and high) based on VDT and one radiomic feature (compactness). High-risk patients had extremely poor survival outcomes (hazard ratio [HR] = 8.15; 25% 5-year OS) versus low-risk patients (HR = 1.00; 83.3% 5-year OS). Among early-stage lung cancers, high-risk patients had poor survival outcomes (HR = 9.07; 44.4% 5-year OS) versus the low-risk group (HR = 1.00; 90.9% 5-year OS). For VDT, the decision tree analysis identified a novel cut-point of 279 days and using this cut-point VDT alone discriminated between aggressive (HR = 4.18; 45% 5-year OS) versus indolent/low-risk cancers (HR = 1.00; 82.8% 5-year OS). CONCLUSION We utilized peritumoral and intratumoral radiomic features and VDT to generate a model that identify a high-risk group of screen-detected lung cancers associated with poor survival outcomes. These vulnerable subset of screen-detected lung cancers may be candidates for more aggressive surveillance/follow-up and treatment, such as adjuvant therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体积倍增时间和放射学特征预测筛检肺癌的肿瘤行为。
背景:基于图像的生物标志物可以通过表征肺癌筛查期间诊断出的肺癌的肿瘤行为而具有翻译意义。在这项研究中,使用肿瘤周围和肿瘤内放射组学和体积倍增时间(VDT)来识别肺癌筛查中诊断出的与不良生存结果相关的高危肺癌患者亚群。方法数据和图像来源于国家肺筛查试验。VDT在两次随后的筛查间隔之间计算,间隔约为1年;从基线筛查中提取肿瘤周围和肿瘤内放射组学。总生存期(OS)是主要终点。分类和回归树分析确定了最具预测性的协变量来分类患者的结果。结果基于VDT和一个放射学特征(致密性),决策树分析将患者分为低、中、高三个风险组。高危患者生存结局极差(危险比[HR] = 8.15;25% 5年OS)与低危患者(HR = 1.00;83.3% 5年OS)。在早期肺癌患者中,高危患者的生存结局较差(HR = 9.07;44.4% 5年OS)与低危组相比(HR = 1.00;90.9% 5年OS)。对于VDT,决策树分析确定了279天的新切割点,并且仅使用该切割点VDT区分侵略性(HR = 4.18;45%的5年OS)与惰性/低危癌症(HR = 1.00;82.8% 5年OS)。结论:我们利用肿瘤周围和肿瘤内的放射学特征以及VDT来建立一个模型,该模型可以识别与生存预后差相关的筛查检测肺癌高危组。这些筛查检测到的易感肺癌亚群可能需要更积极的监测/随访和治疗,如辅助治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Biomarkers
Cancer Biomarkers ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
195
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Concentrating on molecular biomarkers in cancer research, Cancer Biomarkers publishes original research findings (and reviews solicited by the editor) on the subject of the identification of markers associated with the disease processes whether or not they are an integral part of the pathological lesion. The disease markers may include, but are not limited to, genomic, epigenomic, proteomics, cellular and morphologic, and genetic factors predisposing to the disease or indicating the occurrence of the disease. Manuscripts on these factors or biomarkers, either in altered forms, abnormal concentrations or with abnormal tissue distribution leading to disease causation will be accepted.
期刊最新文献
The importance of biglycan, decorin and TGF-1 levels in the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer. Exploring lipid metabolism-associated gene biomarkers and their regulatory mechanisms in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Knockdown of HSF1 inhibits invasion, metastasis, and proliferation of endometrial carcinoma cells while promoting apoptosis. CXCL1 and CXCL8: Reliable and feasible biomarkers differentiating intrapulmonary metastasis from multiple primary neoplasms in non-small cell lung cancers. Microbial biomarker development for detection and prognosis of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1