Lessons learnt from providing technical assistance to Chinese generic medicines manufactures to achieve the WHO Prequalification standards

Baobin Huang, Sarah Louise Barber, Christina Foerg-Wimmer
{"title":"Lessons learnt from providing technical assistance to Chinese generic medicines manufactures to achieve the WHO Prequalification standards","authors":"Baobin Huang, Sarah Louise Barber, Christina Foerg-Wimmer","doi":"10.1177/1741134319859394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The World Health Organization (WHO) Prequalification sets a benchmark of generic medicines quality standards for both local utilization and international procurement. So far in China, there are only 35 medicines prequalified by WHO among around 400 eligible products. With a large volume of generic medicines production capacity, WHO has been paying great attention to Chinese firms by providing technical assistance to achieve WHO Prequalification standards. In 2009–2011, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation sponsored a project to scale up tuberculosis control in China. The adoption of anti-tuberculosis medicines in fixed dose combinations form was selected as an important intervention tool. In order to have quality assured anti-tuberculosis medicines available, four Chinese anti-tuberculosis generic manufacturers were selected for technical assistance as a pilot. The maturity of each generic manufacturers to achieve WHO standards was used to evaluate the role of WHO’s technical assistance. The maturity was measured from the perspective of production and dossier. The WHO’s technical assistance contributes to the maturity of manufacturers. In production, it increased from an average of 53% to 80% for quality management system, and 70% to 80% for good manufacturing practices; in regulatory dossier, it increased from 28% to 67% for quality part, and 0% to 75% for efficacy and safety part. It also found out the factors having impact on the effect of technical assistance. The sustainability of technical interventions was influenced by guaranteed market share and support of two key partners: active pharmaceutical ingredients producers and clinical research organizations. The pressure of upgraded national drug regulatory standards has an impact on the effect of technical assistance.","PeriodicalId":15914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Generic Medicines: The Business Journal for the Generic Medicines Sector","volume":"14 1","pages":"133 - 137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Generic Medicines: The Business Journal for the Generic Medicines Sector","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1741134319859394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) Prequalification sets a benchmark of generic medicines quality standards for both local utilization and international procurement. So far in China, there are only 35 medicines prequalified by WHO among around 400 eligible products. With a large volume of generic medicines production capacity, WHO has been paying great attention to Chinese firms by providing technical assistance to achieve WHO Prequalification standards. In 2009–2011, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation sponsored a project to scale up tuberculosis control in China. The adoption of anti-tuberculosis medicines in fixed dose combinations form was selected as an important intervention tool. In order to have quality assured anti-tuberculosis medicines available, four Chinese anti-tuberculosis generic manufacturers were selected for technical assistance as a pilot. The maturity of each generic manufacturers to achieve WHO standards was used to evaluate the role of WHO’s technical assistance. The maturity was measured from the perspective of production and dossier. The WHO’s technical assistance contributes to the maturity of manufacturers. In production, it increased from an average of 53% to 80% for quality management system, and 70% to 80% for good manufacturing practices; in regulatory dossier, it increased from 28% to 67% for quality part, and 0% to 75% for efficacy and safety part. It also found out the factors having impact on the effect of technical assistance. The sustainability of technical interventions was influenced by guaranteed market share and support of two key partners: active pharmaceutical ingredients producers and clinical research organizations. The pressure of upgraded national drug regulatory standards has an impact on the effect of technical assistance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向中国仿制药生产商提供技术援助以达到世卫组织资格预审标准的经验教训
世界卫生组织(世卫组织)资格预审为当地使用和国际采购制定了非专利药品质量标准基准。到目前为止,在中国约400种符合条件的产品中,只有35种药物通过了世卫组织的资格预审。世卫组织拥有大量仿制药生产能力,一直高度重视中国企业,为达到世卫组织资格预审标准提供技术援助。2009-2011年,比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会资助了一个项目,旨在扩大中国的结核病控制。采用固定剂量组合形式的抗结核药物作为重要的干预手段。为了提供有质量保证的抗结核药物,选择了四家中国抗结核仿制药生产商作为试点提供技术援助。每个仿制药制造商达到世卫组织标准的成熟度被用来评价世卫组织技术援助的作用。从生产和档案的角度对成熟度进行了测量。世卫组织的技术援助有助于制造商的成熟。在生产中,质量管理体系从平均53%提高到80%,良好生产规范从平均70%提高到80%;在监管档案中,质量部分从28%增加到67%,有效性和安全性部分从0%增加到75%。它还查明了影响技术援助效果的因素。技术干预措施的可持续性受到两个关键伙伴(活性药物成分生产商和临床研究组织)的市场份额保证和支持的影响。国家药品管理标准升级的压力对技术援助的效果产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patients’ perceptions of community pharmacists’ role: A cross-sectional study in Lebanon Impact of the economic crisis on the health-related quality of life of adults in Lebanon: An observational cross-sectional study Comparison of a brand-name drug and its generic drugs - Impact of anti-human immunodeficiency virus drug exposure on the intestinal epithelial barrier Factors influencing the creation of an industry 4.0 strategy in the generic pharmaceutical industry The Journal of Generic Medicines – Editorial March 2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1