Estimating the New Keynesian Phillips Curve with Regional Data and Selected Instruments

Dan Li
{"title":"Estimating the New Keynesian Phillips Curve with Regional Data and Selected Instruments","authors":"Dan Li","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3710317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the increase in nationwide unemployment following the Great Recession, the United States only saw a moderate fall in inflation, which has led to numerous debates on whether the Phillips curve has indeed flattened. The empirical discrepancies leading to this debate could stem from estimation issues related to confounding cost-push shocks and the many weak instruments encountered by the aggregate New Keynesian Phillips curve. This paper resolves these two issues by incorporating regional variation and instrument selection. Monte-Carlo simulations demonstrate that regional data help with the identification of the Phillips curve when cost-push shocks bias the aggregate estimation, and the NKPC estimation can be further improved in finite samples with instrument selection. I apply these methods to US metropolitan data and find that the aggregate Phillips curve has not flattened; on the contrary, the trade-off between inflation and unemployment remains strong when using regional data from more recent periods.","PeriodicalId":18085,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Employment","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Employment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3710317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the increase in nationwide unemployment following the Great Recession, the United States only saw a moderate fall in inflation, which has led to numerous debates on whether the Phillips curve has indeed flattened. The empirical discrepancies leading to this debate could stem from estimation issues related to confounding cost-push shocks and the many weak instruments encountered by the aggregate New Keynesian Phillips curve. This paper resolves these two issues by incorporating regional variation and instrument selection. Monte-Carlo simulations demonstrate that regional data help with the identification of the Phillips curve when cost-push shocks bias the aggregate estimation, and the NKPC estimation can be further improved in finite samples with instrument selection. I apply these methods to US metropolitan data and find that the aggregate Phillips curve has not flattened; on the contrary, the trade-off between inflation and unemployment remains strong when using regional data from more recent periods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用区域数据和选定工具估计新凯恩斯菲利普斯曲线
尽管大衰退后全国失业率上升,但美国的通货膨胀率只出现了温和下降,这引发了关于菲利普斯曲线是否真的趋平的许多争论。导致这场争论的经验差异可能源于与混淆成本推动冲击和新凯恩斯菲利普斯曲线所遇到的许多弱工具相关的估计问题。本文通过结合区域差异和工具选择来解决这两个问题。蒙特卡罗模拟表明,当成本-推力冲击对总体估计产生偏差时,区域数据有助于识别菲利普斯曲线,并且在有限样本条件下,通过工具选择可以进一步改善NKPC估计。我将这些方法应用于美国大都市的数据,发现总体菲利普斯曲线并没有趋平;相反,在使用较近时期的地区数据时,通胀与失业之间的权衡关系仍然很强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deregulating Teacher Labor Markets Trends in Commuting Time of European Workers: A Cross-Country Analysis Labor Market Networks and Asset Returns Intergenerational Income Mobility and Economic Freedom as Positive Liberty Gender Identity, Co-Working Spouses and Relative Income within Households
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1