{"title":"Can Technology Democratize Finance?","authors":"Nick Bernards","doi":"10.1017/S0892679423000096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This essay reviews two recent books—Marion Laboure and Nicolas Deffrennes's Democratizing Finance and Eswar S. Prasad's The Future of Money—on financial technology (fintech) and the future of money. Both books present overviews of recent developments in fintech and assess the prospects of technological change to deliver a more accessible, equitable financial system—described in both cases as the “democratization of finance.” I raise two key concerns about the limits of the “democratization” implied here. First, the vision of democratized finance implicit in both books rests on claims about widening access to financial services for individuals, households, and businesses. This contrasts with more substantive visions of democratized finance that entail the exercise of accountable, deliberative decision-making on monetary and financial questions. Second, “fintech democracy” rests on a very thin account of how finance might be democratized, stressing exogenous technological change, with little consideration of relations of power, institutional reforms, or mobilization. Both books provide eloquent and comprehensive overviews of emerging fintech debates, but in so doing ultimately reveal important limitations to achieving financial democracy through fintech.","PeriodicalId":11772,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & International Affairs","volume":"3 1","pages":"81 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679423000096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract This essay reviews two recent books—Marion Laboure and Nicolas Deffrennes's Democratizing Finance and Eswar S. Prasad's The Future of Money—on financial technology (fintech) and the future of money. Both books present overviews of recent developments in fintech and assess the prospects of technological change to deliver a more accessible, equitable financial system—described in both cases as the “democratization of finance.” I raise two key concerns about the limits of the “democratization” implied here. First, the vision of democratized finance implicit in both books rests on claims about widening access to financial services for individuals, households, and businesses. This contrasts with more substantive visions of democratized finance that entail the exercise of accountable, deliberative decision-making on monetary and financial questions. Second, “fintech democracy” rests on a very thin account of how finance might be democratized, stressing exogenous technological change, with little consideration of relations of power, institutional reforms, or mobilization. Both books provide eloquent and comprehensive overviews of emerging fintech debates, but in so doing ultimately reveal important limitations to achieving financial democracy through fintech.
本文回顾了最近两本关于金融技术(fintech)和货币未来的书——marion labour和Nicolas Deffrennes的《金融民主化》和Eswar S. Prasad的《货币的未来》。这两本书都概述了金融科技的最新发展,并评估了技术变革的前景,以提供一个更容易获得、更公平的金融体系——在这两本书中都被描述为“金融民主化”。我对这里隐含的“民主化”的局限性提出了两个关键的担忧。首先,两本书中隐含的金融民主化愿景都建立在扩大个人、家庭和企业获得金融服务的机会的主张之上。这与更为实质性的金融民主化愿景形成鲜明对比,后者要求对货币和金融问题进行负责任的、审慎的决策。其次,“金融科技民主”建立在对金融如何实现民主化的非常薄弱的描述上,强调外源性技术变革,很少考虑权力关系、制度改革或动员。这两本书都对新兴的金融科技辩论进行了雄辩而全面的概述,但最终揭示了通过金融科技实现金融民主的重要局限性。