Posterior tibial artery flap with an adipofascial extension: Clinical application in head and neck reconstruction with detailed insight into septocutaneous perforators and donor site morbidity.

M. Mashrah, L. Mai, Q. Wan, Zhi-Quan Huang, Jianguang Wang, Zhaoyu Lin, S. Fan, C. Pan
{"title":"Posterior tibial artery flap with an adipofascial extension: Clinical application in head and neck reconstruction with detailed insight into septocutaneous perforators and donor site morbidity.","authors":"M. Mashrah, L. Mai, Q. Wan, Zhi-Quan Huang, Jianguang Wang, Zhaoyu Lin, S. Fan, C. Pan","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000006396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe general aim of this study is to describe a new modification to the posterior tibial artery flap (PTAF) and its clinical application in head and neck reconstruction and to investigate the distribution of septocutaneous perforators (SP) of the posterior tibial artery (PTA). The specific aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of this new modification to the PTAF and describe the flap survival rate and donor site morbidity.\n\n\nMETHODS\nFrom November 2017 to August 2018, 85 consecutive patients underwent PTAF reconstruction of the head and neck region after tumor extirpation. All PTAFs were harvested with a long adipofascial extension, and donor site defects were closed with a triangularly shaped full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) harvested adjacent to the flap. Special consideration was given to the harvesting technique, distribution of the posterior tibial artery SP, flap outcomes and associated donor-site morbidity.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFlap survival was 100%. The number of SPs varied from 1 to 5 per leg, with a mean of 2.61(1.15), and the SP were mostly clustered in the middle and distal thirds of the medial surface of the leg. The prevalence of the presence of one, two, three, four and five SP per leg was 7%, 33%, 27%, 19%, and 14%, respectively. Total and partial skin graft loss at the donor site was reported in 2 and 6 patients, respectively, who were conservatively managed. There was no statistically significant difference when comparing the pre- and postoperative range of ankle movements (P >0.05).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThis new modification to the PTAF allows for the incorporation of more SPs into the flap, omits the need for a second donor site to close the donor site defect, and provides sufficient tissue to fill the dead space after tumor resection and neck dissection.","PeriodicalId":20168,"journal":{"name":"Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

BACKGROUND The general aim of this study is to describe a new modification to the posterior tibial artery flap (PTAF) and its clinical application in head and neck reconstruction and to investigate the distribution of septocutaneous perforators (SP) of the posterior tibial artery (PTA). The specific aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of this new modification to the PTAF and describe the flap survival rate and donor site morbidity. METHODS From November 2017 to August 2018, 85 consecutive patients underwent PTAF reconstruction of the head and neck region after tumor extirpation. All PTAFs were harvested with a long adipofascial extension, and donor site defects were closed with a triangularly shaped full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) harvested adjacent to the flap. Special consideration was given to the harvesting technique, distribution of the posterior tibial artery SP, flap outcomes and associated donor-site morbidity. RESULTS Flap survival was 100%. The number of SPs varied from 1 to 5 per leg, with a mean of 2.61(1.15), and the SP were mostly clustered in the middle and distal thirds of the medial surface of the leg. The prevalence of the presence of one, two, three, four and five SP per leg was 7%, 33%, 27%, 19%, and 14%, respectively. Total and partial skin graft loss at the donor site was reported in 2 and 6 patients, respectively, who were conservatively managed. There was no statistically significant difference when comparing the pre- and postoperative range of ankle movements (P >0.05). CONCLUSION This new modification to the PTAF allows for the incorporation of more SPs into the flap, omits the need for a second donor site to close the donor site defect, and provides sufficient tissue to fill the dead space after tumor resection and neck dissection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带脂肪筋膜后延伸的胫后动脉皮瓣:在头颈部重建中的临床应用,并详细了解皮中隔穿支和供区发病率。
本研究的主要目的是描述一种新的胫骨后动脉皮瓣(PTAF)及其在头颈部重建中的临床应用,并研究胫骨后动脉(PTA)的中隔皮穿支(SP)的分布。本研究的具体目的是评估这种新的PTAF修饰的有效性,并描述皮瓣存活率和供区发病率。方法2017年11月至2018年8月,连续85例患者在肿瘤切除后进行头颈部PTAF重建。所有的ptaf都是通过长脂肪筋膜延伸来收获的,并且在皮瓣附近收获一个三角形的全层皮肤移植物(FTSG)来关闭供体部位的缺陷。特别考虑了收获技术,胫骨后动脉SP的分布,皮瓣的结果和相关的供区发病率。结果皮瓣成活率100%。每条腿的SP数在1 ~ 5个之间,平均2.61个(1.15个),SP多聚集在腿内侧表面的中远三分之一处。每条腿有1、2、3、4和5个SP的患病率分别为7%、33%、27%、19%和14%。分别有2例和6例患者报告了供体部位的全部和部分皮肤移植丢失,这些患者接受了保守治疗。术前与术后踝关节活动范围比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论PTAF的新修饰允许更多的SPs进入皮瓣,不需要第二个供区来关闭供区缺损,并提供足够的组织来填补肿瘤切除和颈部清扫后的死亡空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
41 Hand Infections 36 Treatment of Pressure Ulcers 18 Mandible Reconstruction 4 Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI)pharyngoplasty inPharyngoplastyin velopharyngeal insufficiencyVelopharyngeal Insufficiency: Pharyngoplasty 23 Breast Reduction in the Female Patient: General Considerations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1