Comparative Bioavailability Study of Two 81 mg Coated Tablet Formulations of Acetylsalicylic Acid in Fasting Healthy Volunteers

Dolores Rc, Antunes Nj, Moreno R, Di Vaio P, Magli E, De Nucci G
{"title":"Comparative Bioavailability Study of Two 81 mg Coated Tablet Formulations of Acetylsalicylic Acid in Fasting Healthy Volunteers","authors":"Dolores Rc, Antunes Nj, Moreno R, Di Vaio P, Magli E, De Nucci G","doi":"10.4172/JBB.1000348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Low-dose acetylsalicylic acid is used as antithrombotic agent and the enteric-coated formulations are widely used to minimize the gastrointestinal side effects. \nAim: To compare the bioavailability of two acetylsalicylic acid formulations (Ecasil-81®, 81 mg coated tablet) in fasting healthy volunteers. \nMethods: Healthy volunteers (n=16) were recruited to a monocentric, open label, randomized, two-way crossover pharmacokinetic study, with seven days washout period between the treatments. They received a single 81 mg oral dose of a test (new formulation) or a standard reference formulation of acetylsalicylic acid (Ecasil-81®) after about 8 h fasting. Blood samples were collected over a period of 36 h. The salicylic acid plasma concentration was evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the WinNonlin program. \nResults: The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of salicylic acid was 5433 and 5719 ng/mL reached in 3.66 and 4.02 h (tmax) for the test and the reference formulation, respectively. The 90% confidence interval of the ratios of geometric means of Cmax and area under curve of plasma concentration until the last concentration observed (AUC0- last) were within the interval 80-125%. \nConclusion: The new acetylsalicylic acid formulation has a bioavailability equivalent to the reference formulation for the rate and the extent of absorption.","PeriodicalId":15184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability","volume":"45 1","pages":"477-483"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/JBB.1000348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Low-dose acetylsalicylic acid is used as antithrombotic agent and the enteric-coated formulations are widely used to minimize the gastrointestinal side effects. Aim: To compare the bioavailability of two acetylsalicylic acid formulations (Ecasil-81®, 81 mg coated tablet) in fasting healthy volunteers. Methods: Healthy volunteers (n=16) were recruited to a monocentric, open label, randomized, two-way crossover pharmacokinetic study, with seven days washout period between the treatments. They received a single 81 mg oral dose of a test (new formulation) or a standard reference formulation of acetylsalicylic acid (Ecasil-81®) after about 8 h fasting. Blood samples were collected over a period of 36 h. The salicylic acid plasma concentration was evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the WinNonlin program. Results: The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of salicylic acid was 5433 and 5719 ng/mL reached in 3.66 and 4.02 h (tmax) for the test and the reference formulation, respectively. The 90% confidence interval of the ratios of geometric means of Cmax and area under curve of plasma concentration until the last concentration observed (AUC0- last) were within the interval 80-125%. Conclusion: The new acetylsalicylic acid formulation has a bioavailability equivalent to the reference formulation for the rate and the extent of absorption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种81 mg乙酰水杨酸包衣片在空腹健康志愿者体内的生物利用度比较研究
前言:低剂量乙酰水杨酸作为抗血栓药,肠溶包被制剂被广泛使用,以尽量减少胃肠道副作用。目的:比较两种乙酰水杨酸制剂(Ecasil-81®,81 mg包衣片)在空腹健康志愿者体内的生物利用度。方法:招募健康志愿者(n=16)进行单中心、开放标签、随机、双向交叉药代动力学研究,两组之间有7天的洗脱期。他们在禁食约8小时后接受单剂量81 mg的口服试验(新配方)或标准参考配方乙酰水杨酸(Ecasil-81®)。采集血样36 h,采用高效液相色谱-串联质谱法(HPLC-MS/MS)测定水杨酸血药浓度。采用WinNonlin程序进行非室间药代动力学分析。结果:水杨酸的最大血药浓度(Cmax)分别在3.66 h和4.02 h达到5433和5719 ng/mL。Cmax几何平均值与最后一次观察到的血浆浓度曲线下面积之比(AUC0- last)的90%置信区间在80-125%之间。结论:乙酰水杨酸新制剂在吸收速率和吸收程度上与参比制剂具有相当的生物利用度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Future Outlook for Biosafety and Biotechnology Effect of Fatty Acids on Bioavailability Clinical Trials of COVID-19 in China Anticipation of Castor Industry and Bottle Scruff Deviation Range to Address Genuine Bioavailability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1