Dolores Rc, Antunes Nj, Moreno R, Di Vaio P, Magli E, De Nucci G
{"title":"Comparative Bioavailability Study of Two 81 mg Coated Tablet Formulations of Acetylsalicylic Acid in Fasting Healthy Volunteers","authors":"Dolores Rc, Antunes Nj, Moreno R, Di Vaio P, Magli E, De Nucci G","doi":"10.4172/JBB.1000348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Low-dose acetylsalicylic acid is used as antithrombotic agent and the enteric-coated formulations are widely used to minimize the gastrointestinal side effects. \nAim: To compare the bioavailability of two acetylsalicylic acid formulations (Ecasil-81®, 81 mg coated tablet) in fasting healthy volunteers. \nMethods: Healthy volunteers (n=16) were recruited to a monocentric, open label, randomized, two-way crossover pharmacokinetic study, with seven days washout period between the treatments. They received a single 81 mg oral dose of a test (new formulation) or a standard reference formulation of acetylsalicylic acid (Ecasil-81®) after about 8 h fasting. Blood samples were collected over a period of 36 h. The salicylic acid plasma concentration was evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the WinNonlin program. \nResults: The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of salicylic acid was 5433 and 5719 ng/mL reached in 3.66 and 4.02 h (tmax) for the test and the reference formulation, respectively. The 90% confidence interval of the ratios of geometric means of Cmax and area under curve of plasma concentration until the last concentration observed (AUC0- last) were within the interval 80-125%. \nConclusion: The new acetylsalicylic acid formulation has a bioavailability equivalent to the reference formulation for the rate and the extent of absorption.","PeriodicalId":15184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability","volume":"45 1","pages":"477-483"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/JBB.1000348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Introduction: Low-dose acetylsalicylic acid is used as antithrombotic agent and the enteric-coated formulations are widely used to minimize the gastrointestinal side effects.
Aim: To compare the bioavailability of two acetylsalicylic acid formulations (Ecasil-81®, 81 mg coated tablet) in fasting healthy volunteers.
Methods: Healthy volunteers (n=16) were recruited to a monocentric, open label, randomized, two-way crossover pharmacokinetic study, with seven days washout period between the treatments. They received a single 81 mg oral dose of a test (new formulation) or a standard reference formulation of acetylsalicylic acid (Ecasil-81®) after about 8 h fasting. Blood samples were collected over a period of 36 h. The salicylic acid plasma concentration was evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the WinNonlin program.
Results: The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of salicylic acid was 5433 and 5719 ng/mL reached in 3.66 and 4.02 h (tmax) for the test and the reference formulation, respectively. The 90% confidence interval of the ratios of geometric means of Cmax and area under curve of plasma concentration until the last concentration observed (AUC0- last) were within the interval 80-125%.
Conclusion: The new acetylsalicylic acid formulation has a bioavailability equivalent to the reference formulation for the rate and the extent of absorption.