Process Evaluation of the BearStand Behavioral Intervention: A Social Cognitive Theory-Based Approach To Reduce Occupational Sedentary Behavior.

Amanda H. Wilkerson, Christina N. Bridges, Cindy Wu, Megan McClendon, Shana M. Walsh, M. Patterson, Renée M. Umstattd Meyer
{"title":"Process Evaluation of the BearStand Behavioral Intervention: A Social Cognitive Theory-Based Approach To Reduce Occupational Sedentary Behavior.","authors":"Amanda H. Wilkerson, Christina N. Bridges, Cindy Wu, Megan McClendon, Shana M. Walsh, M. Patterson, Renée M. Umstattd Meyer","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000001704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nDescribe the process evaluation of the behavioral intervention group of a multi-component workplace intervention, BearStand, to reduce employees' sitting time using sit-stand workstations and behavioral strategies.\n\n\nMETHODS\nProcess evaluation metrics: dose delivered, dose-received exposure, dose-received satisfaction, and context were collected using an online survey. Participants included employees of a U.S. university.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOverall, 38 of 52 participants completed the process evaluation. The majority were satisfied (53%) with the intervention. Participants' interactions with intervention materials decreased over time (73.7%, week 1, to 52.6%, week 13), and 42% and 33% of participants used suggested videos and apps, respectively. Participants found goal setting and self-regulation strategies to be the most helpful and identified workplace-related contextual barriers that impacted intervention engagement.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nFuture interventions should incorporate more engaging materials for participants, reduce contextual barriers, and facilitate use of apps and videos.","PeriodicalId":46545,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":"234 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Describe the process evaluation of the behavioral intervention group of a multi-component workplace intervention, BearStand, to reduce employees' sitting time using sit-stand workstations and behavioral strategies. METHODS Process evaluation metrics: dose delivered, dose-received exposure, dose-received satisfaction, and context were collected using an online survey. Participants included employees of a U.S. university. RESULTS Overall, 38 of 52 participants completed the process evaluation. The majority were satisfied (53%) with the intervention. Participants' interactions with intervention materials decreased over time (73.7%, week 1, to 52.6%, week 13), and 42% and 33% of participants used suggested videos and apps, respectively. Participants found goal setting and self-regulation strategies to be the most helpful and identified workplace-related contextual barriers that impacted intervention engagement. CONCLUSIONS Future interventions should incorporate more engaging materials for participants, reduce contextual barriers, and facilitate use of apps and videos.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
熊立行为干预的过程评价:基于社会认知理论的职业久坐行为减少方法。
目的描述多组份工作场所干预BearStand行为干预组的过程评价,利用坐立两用工作站和行为策略减少员工的久坐时间。方法通过在线调查收集过程评价指标:剂量传递、剂量接受暴露、剂量接受满意度和环境。参与者包括一所美国大学的雇员。结果总的来说,52名参与者中有38名完成了过程评估。大多数人(53%)对干预措施感到满意。参与者与干预材料的互动随着时间的推移而减少(第1周为73.7%,第13周为52.6%),分别有42%和33%的参与者使用建议的视频和应用程序。参与者发现目标设定和自我调节策略是最有帮助的,并确定了影响干预参与的与工作场所相关的环境障碍。结论未来的干预措施应纳入更多吸引参与者的材料,减少情境障碍,并促进应用程序和视频的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Use of Metabolomic Tool in Assessing Environmental Exposure Fine and Ultrafine Particle Pollution Before and After a Smoking ban in the Catering Industry in Vienna Investigating the level of Safety Considerations in Radiology Centers (North of Iran): Cross –Sectional Study New Highlights. The Last Note.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1