{"title":"Comparative study of analytical/semi-analytical methods for prediction of axial strength of cold-formed steel wall panels with sheathing","authors":"Chanchal Sonkar, A. Mittal","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2021.2012388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Load-bearing cold-formed steel (CFS) wall panels comprise of a stud (C-section), track (U-section) and sheathing. Sheathing is fastened to the CFS frame with self-drilling screws, which has an effect on the axial load-carrying capacity of panels. Experiments are complex and often expensive as they require use of different resources (raw material, manpower etc.). Therefore, conducting experiments is not always possible and an efficient design tool is necessary. Few studies are present in literature on comparing the effectiveness of available design methodologies. For the first time, an attempt is made to compare all the three (03) presented mathematical models together to predict the axial strength of CFS wall panels with sheathing. The present study examines the effectiveness of such analytical/semi-analytical tools, namely, Rayleigh-Ritz (R-R) method, Differential equation of equilibrium (DEEq) method and Constrained and Unconstrained Finite Strip Method – Direct Strength Method (CUFSM-DSM) for estimation of axial load-carrying capacity of sheathed CFS panels. The results show that CUFSM-DSM can be utilized meritoriously for evaluation of sheathed CFS wall panels.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2021.2012388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
ABSTRACT Load-bearing cold-formed steel (CFS) wall panels comprise of a stud (C-section), track (U-section) and sheathing. Sheathing is fastened to the CFS frame with self-drilling screws, which has an effect on the axial load-carrying capacity of panels. Experiments are complex and often expensive as they require use of different resources (raw material, manpower etc.). Therefore, conducting experiments is not always possible and an efficient design tool is necessary. Few studies are present in literature on comparing the effectiveness of available design methodologies. For the first time, an attempt is made to compare all the three (03) presented mathematical models together to predict the axial strength of CFS wall panels with sheathing. The present study examines the effectiveness of such analytical/semi-analytical tools, namely, Rayleigh-Ritz (R-R) method, Differential equation of equilibrium (DEEq) method and Constrained and Unconstrained Finite Strip Method – Direct Strength Method (CUFSM-DSM) for estimation of axial load-carrying capacity of sheathed CFS panels. The results show that CUFSM-DSM can be utilized meritoriously for evaluation of sheathed CFS wall panels.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.