Performance Comparison of Deep Learning Models to Detect Covid-19 Based on X-Ray Images

S. Riyadi, Yunita Lestari, Cahya Damarjati, K. Ghazali
{"title":"Performance Comparison of Deep Learning Models to Detect Covid-19 Based on X-Ray Images","authors":"S. Riyadi, Yunita Lestari, Cahya Damarjati, K. Ghazali","doi":"10.24002/ijis.v4i2.5491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The SARS-Cov-2 outbreak caused by a coronavirus infection shocked dozens of countries. This disease has spread rapidly and become a new pandemic, a serious threat and even destroys various sectors of life. Along with technological developments, various deep learning models have been developed to classify between Covid-19 and Normal X-ray images of lungs, such as Inception V3, Inception V4 and MobileNet. These models have been separately reported to perform good classification on Covid-19. However, there is no comparison of their performance in classifying Covid-19 on the same data. This research aims to compare the performance of the three mentioned deep learning models in classifying Covid-19 based on X-ray images. The methods involve data collection, pre-processing, training, and testing using the three models. According to 2,169 dataset, the InceptionV3 model obtained an average accuracy value of 99.62%, precision value 99.65%, recall value 99.5%, specificity value 99.5%, and f-score value 99.52%; while the InceptionV4 model obtained an average accuracy value of 97.79%, precision value 98.11%, recall value 90.18%, specificity value 90.18%, and f-score value 97.25%; and the MobileNet model obtained an average accuracy value of 99.67%, precision value 99.77%, recall value 99.38%, specificity value 99.38%, and f-score value of 99.67%. The three models can classify the Covid-19 and Normal X-ray images based on research results, while the MobileNet model achieved the best performance. The model has stable performance in achieving graphic results and has extensive layers; the more layers there are to achieve better accuracy results.","PeriodicalId":34118,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Information Systems","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24002/ijis.v4i2.5491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The SARS-Cov-2 outbreak caused by a coronavirus infection shocked dozens of countries. This disease has spread rapidly and become a new pandemic, a serious threat and even destroys various sectors of life. Along with technological developments, various deep learning models have been developed to classify between Covid-19 and Normal X-ray images of lungs, such as Inception V3, Inception V4 and MobileNet. These models have been separately reported to perform good classification on Covid-19. However, there is no comparison of their performance in classifying Covid-19 on the same data. This research aims to compare the performance of the three mentioned deep learning models in classifying Covid-19 based on X-ray images. The methods involve data collection, pre-processing, training, and testing using the three models. According to 2,169 dataset, the InceptionV3 model obtained an average accuracy value of 99.62%, precision value 99.65%, recall value 99.5%, specificity value 99.5%, and f-score value 99.52%; while the InceptionV4 model obtained an average accuracy value of 97.79%, precision value 98.11%, recall value 90.18%, specificity value 90.18%, and f-score value 97.25%; and the MobileNet model obtained an average accuracy value of 99.67%, precision value 99.77%, recall value 99.38%, specificity value 99.38%, and f-score value of 99.67%. The three models can classify the Covid-19 and Normal X-ray images based on research results, while the MobileNet model achieved the best performance. The model has stable performance in achieving graphic results and has extensive layers; the more layers there are to achieve better accuracy results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于x射线图像检测Covid-19的深度学习模型性能比较
由冠状病毒感染引起的SARS-Cov-2疫情震惊了数十个国家。这一疾病迅速蔓延,成为一种新的流行病,严重威胁甚至破坏了生活的各个方面。随着技术的发展,人们开发了各种深度学习模型来区分Covid-19和正常的肺部x射线图像,如Inception V3、Inception V4和MobileNet。这些模型分别被报道对Covid-19进行了良好的分类。然而,在相同的数据上,它们在对Covid-19进行分类方面的表现没有比较。本研究旨在比较上述三种深度学习模型在基于x射线图像对Covid-19进行分类方面的性能。方法包括数据收集、预处理、训练和使用这三种模型的测试。根据2169个数据集,InceptionV3模型的平均准确率为99.62%,准确率为99.65%,召回率为99.5%,特异性为99.5%,f-score值为99.52%;InceptionV4模型的平均准确率为97.79%,准确率为98.11%,召回率为90.18%,特异性为90.18%,f-score值为97.25%;MobileNet模型的平均准确率为99.67%,准确率为99.77%,召回率为99.38%,特异性为99.38%,f-score值为99.67%。三种模型均能根据研究结果对Covid-19和Normal x射线图像进行分类,其中MobileNet模型的分类效果最好。该模型具有图形化效果稳定、层数广泛的特点;层数越多,精度越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Implementation of Business Process Blockchain Technology Based of MSCWR SmartBox Model Priority Scheduling Implementation for Exam Schedule SPAM (Smart Patient Monitoring System) using Structural Similarity Index Measurement An Investigation of Nurses' Perceptions of the Usefulness and Easiness of Using Electronic Medical Records in Saudi Arabia: A Technology Acceptance Model Mobile Application for Medicinal Plants Recognition from Leaf Image Using Convolutional Neural Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1