The New Academic Labor Market and Graduate Students: Introduction to the Special Issue

IF 0.8 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor Pub Date : 2013-09-14 DOI:10.14288/WORKPLACE.V0I22.184422
Brad J. Porfilio, Julie Gorlewski, S. Pineo-Jensen
{"title":"The New Academic Labor Market and Graduate Students: Introduction to the Special Issue","authors":"Brad J. Porfilio, Julie Gorlewski, S. Pineo-Jensen","doi":"10.14288/WORKPLACE.V0I22.184422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unlike some who point to faculty, students, administration or governance as the sources of the changing conditions within higher education and how the conditions impact the academic labor market and graduate students, the contributors and editors of this special issue recognize how the dominant ideological doctrine at today’s historical moment – neoliberalism – is largely responsible for the corporate nature of education, the rise and dominance of contingent faculty, and the withdrawal of the state resources from institutions of higher education. Some contributors to this issue elucidate how neoliberalism is responsible for their experiences as contingent faculty members and debt-ridden, freshly minted PhDs. Other authors provide critical historical insight as to how neoliberalism has come to impact intellectual contributions in the academy, whereas some scholars provide theoretical insight to lay bare the discursive systems that keep graduate students, academics, and citizens from confronting institutional structures, practices, and systems of knowledge, leading to the marginalization of academics and hobbling higher education from being equitable for all. Additionally, the collective scholarship in this special issue provides necessary guideposts and recommendations so that higher education becomes a “humanizing force in society, where the value of people is always a priority” (Giroux, 2001, p. 47), instead of a corporate force where greed, competition, vulnerability and suffering is the stark reality.","PeriodicalId":42624,"journal":{"name":"Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14288/WORKPLACE.V0I22.184422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Unlike some who point to faculty, students, administration or governance as the sources of the changing conditions within higher education and how the conditions impact the academic labor market and graduate students, the contributors and editors of this special issue recognize how the dominant ideological doctrine at today’s historical moment – neoliberalism – is largely responsible for the corporate nature of education, the rise and dominance of contingent faculty, and the withdrawal of the state resources from institutions of higher education. Some contributors to this issue elucidate how neoliberalism is responsible for their experiences as contingent faculty members and debt-ridden, freshly minted PhDs. Other authors provide critical historical insight as to how neoliberalism has come to impact intellectual contributions in the academy, whereas some scholars provide theoretical insight to lay bare the discursive systems that keep graduate students, academics, and citizens from confronting institutional structures, practices, and systems of knowledge, leading to the marginalization of academics and hobbling higher education from being equitable for all. Additionally, the collective scholarship in this special issue provides necessary guideposts and recommendations so that higher education becomes a “humanizing force in society, where the value of people is always a priority” (Giroux, 2001, p. 47), instead of a corporate force where greed, competition, vulnerability and suffering is the stark reality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新学术劳动力市场与研究生:特刊导论
不像有些人指出教师、学生、行政或治理是高等教育变化的根源,以及这些变化如何影响学术劳动力市场和研究生,本期特刊的撰稿人和编辑认识到,在今天的历史时刻,占主导地位的意识形态学说——新自由主义——在很大程度上要对教育的企业性质、临时教师的崛起和主导地位负责,国家资源从高等教育机构撤出。这个问题的一些撰稿人阐明了新自由主义是如何对他们作为临时教员和负债累累的新毕业博士的经历负责的。另一些作者则对新自由主义如何影响学术界的学术贡献提供了批判性的历史见解,而一些学者则提供了理论见解,揭露了使研究生、学者和公民无法面对制度结构、实践和知识体系的话语体系,这些话语体系导致了学术界的边缘化,阻碍了高等教育对所有人的公平。此外,这期特刊中的集体奖学金提供了必要的指导和建议,使高等教育成为“社会中的人性化力量,人的价值永远是优先考虑的”(吉鲁,2001,第47页),而不是贪婪,竞争,脆弱和痛苦是残酷现实的公司力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor
Workplace-A Journal for Academic Labor INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The All-Administrative Campus: University of British Columbia, Okanagan "Amos D. Squire, Chief Physician of Sing Sing, 1914-1925" and Other Poems Here We Come Resolving the Contradictions of Academic Unionism John Trudell and the Spirit of Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1