Finding one’s way in media and AI: metallurgy and mapping

IF 1 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.1080/25729861.2021.1992959
Héctor Ricardo Hernández Galeano
{"title":"Finding one’s way in media and AI: metallurgy and mapping","authors":"Héctor Ricardo Hernández Galeano","doi":"10.1080/25729861.2021.1992959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"That which is most palpable of media devices – a uniform tactile screen or the sleek casing of a smartphone – often renders less visible the complex materiality of that technology. Similarly, when speaking about artificial intelligence (AI) and its apparent ability to learn, buzzwords and phrases gloss over a careful understanding of how AI works and how it arose. Jussi Parikka and Kate Crawford concern themselves with ostensibly distinct matters: the former explores what it means to think of media geologically in A Geology of Media, while the latter investigates the history and discourse surrounding AI in Atlas of AI. Nonetheless, Parikka and Crawford coincide in the thrust of their projects: there is a particular theoretical potential in media devices and artificial intelligence that is not obvious in their final, packaged form. Parikka proposes a “metallurgical way of conducting theoretical work” that foregrounds nonhuman, geologic agency in the production of modern media technology. He calls attention to the geologic materiality of media through literature, art and theory: transdisciplinarity is central to the metallurgic method. Crawford adopts a cartographical approach, cutting through the mystique of AI by mapping out what AI is, what it is not, and how it has come to wield an air of unknowable abstraction. Through their respective methods, both books seek to (re)-ground media, intelligence, and discourse and begin anew.","PeriodicalId":36898,"journal":{"name":"Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2021.1992959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

That which is most palpable of media devices – a uniform tactile screen or the sleek casing of a smartphone – often renders less visible the complex materiality of that technology. Similarly, when speaking about artificial intelligence (AI) and its apparent ability to learn, buzzwords and phrases gloss over a careful understanding of how AI works and how it arose. Jussi Parikka and Kate Crawford concern themselves with ostensibly distinct matters: the former explores what it means to think of media geologically in A Geology of Media, while the latter investigates the history and discourse surrounding AI in Atlas of AI. Nonetheless, Parikka and Crawford coincide in the thrust of their projects: there is a particular theoretical potential in media devices and artificial intelligence that is not obvious in their final, packaged form. Parikka proposes a “metallurgical way of conducting theoretical work” that foregrounds nonhuman, geologic agency in the production of modern media technology. He calls attention to the geologic materiality of media through literature, art and theory: transdisciplinarity is central to the metallurgic method. Crawford adopts a cartographical approach, cutting through the mystique of AI by mapping out what AI is, what it is not, and how it has come to wield an air of unknowable abstraction. Through their respective methods, both books seek to (re)-ground media, intelligence, and discourse and begin anew.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在媒体和人工智能中找到自己的道路:冶金和制图
媒体设备中最明显的东西——统一的触觉屏幕或智能手机光滑的外壳——往往会让这种技术的复杂物质性变得不那么明显。同样,当谈到人工智能(AI)及其明显的学习能力时,流行语和短语掩盖了对人工智能如何工作以及它是如何产生的仔细理解。Jussi Parikka和Kate Crawford关注的是表面上截然不同的问题:前者在《媒体地质学》中探讨了从地质学角度看待媒体的意义,而后者在《人工智能地图集》中研究了围绕人工智能的历史和话语。尽管如此,Parikka和Crawford在他们项目的主旨上是一致的:在媒体设备和人工智能中有一种特殊的理论潜力,这种潜力在它们最终的包装形式中并不明显。Parikka提出了一种“进行理论工作的冶金方法”,在现代媒体技术的生产中突出了非人类的地质机构。他呼吁通过文学、艺术和理论来关注媒介的地质物质性:跨学科是冶金方法的核心。克劳福德采用了一种制图的方法,通过描绘出人工智能是什么,不是什么,以及它是如何产生一种不可知的抽象氛围,来揭开人工智能的神秘面纱。通过各自的方法,两本书都试图(重新)定位媒体、情报和话语,并重新开始。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society
Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Knowledge mobilization in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) researchers: an approach to the Mexican national health system Changes in the landscape, threats, and the struggle of the quilombola communities from Alto Trombetas for their territories Seminal ideas for old and new problems in Latin America: José Medina Echavarría and his legacy Scalar dissonances, knowledge-making, sense of urgency, and social narratives about the future. Contours of the climate change debate in Latin America A new history of sociology? Southern perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1