How do low-status expatriates deal with crises? Stress, external support and personal coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic

Joshua Haist, Philipp Kurth
{"title":"How do low-status expatriates deal with crises? Stress, external support and personal coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Joshua Haist, Philipp Kurth","doi":"10.1108/jgm-03-2021-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeLow-status expatriates (LSEs), a highly vulnerable group, have been significantly affected by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. This study explores the stressors that continue to impact LSEs in Germany and their access to support during the pandemic.Design/methodology/approachAn interpretivist, qualitative research approach was employed. The authors utilised a multi-level data collection strategy that combined interview and questionnaire data from 16 expatriates and 16 social actors. The data were analysed using a directed content analysis method.FindingsLSEs experienced high levels of stress that were further exacerbated by the introduction of COVID-19 control measures that were intended to slow the spread of the virus. LSEs are particularly vulnerable due to their overrepresentation in precarious professions and the associated job insecurity. Critically, external support from employers and social actors is generally lacking, leaving LSEs to rely on their own personal coping strategies in difficult times.Research limitations/implicationsThe earlier Expatriate crisis Framework highlights the importance of external support for expatriates. However, this framework does not sufficiently account for personal coping strategies that are particularly important for individuals that cannot access such external support (e.g. LSEs). Herein, the authors offer a revised framework that is more applicable to LSEs.Practical implicationsCurrent practices are problematic, necessitating policy changes at both governmental and organisational levels.Originality/valueThis study provides unique insights into the ways in which the pandemic has affected the already precarious position of LSEs and identifies the importance of personal coping strategies in the absence of external sources of support.","PeriodicalId":44863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Mobility-The Home of Expatriate Management Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Mobility-The Home of Expatriate Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgm-03-2021-0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeLow-status expatriates (LSEs), a highly vulnerable group, have been significantly affected by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. This study explores the stressors that continue to impact LSEs in Germany and their access to support during the pandemic.Design/methodology/approachAn interpretivist, qualitative research approach was employed. The authors utilised a multi-level data collection strategy that combined interview and questionnaire data from 16 expatriates and 16 social actors. The data were analysed using a directed content analysis method.FindingsLSEs experienced high levels of stress that were further exacerbated by the introduction of COVID-19 control measures that were intended to slow the spread of the virus. LSEs are particularly vulnerable due to their overrepresentation in precarious professions and the associated job insecurity. Critically, external support from employers and social actors is generally lacking, leaving LSEs to rely on their own personal coping strategies in difficult times.Research limitations/implicationsThe earlier Expatriate crisis Framework highlights the importance of external support for expatriates. However, this framework does not sufficiently account for personal coping strategies that are particularly important for individuals that cannot access such external support (e.g. LSEs). Herein, the authors offer a revised framework that is more applicable to LSEs.Practical implicationsCurrent practices are problematic, necessitating policy changes at both governmental and organisational levels.Originality/valueThis study provides unique insights into the ways in which the pandemic has affected the already precarious position of LSEs and identifies the importance of personal coping strategies in the absence of external sources of support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低地位的外派人员如何处理危机?COVID-19大流行期间的压力、外部支持和个人应对策略
目的低身份外籍人士是一个高度脆弱的群体,受到正在进行的2019冠状病毒病大流行的严重影响。本研究探讨了在大流行期间继续影响德国lse的压力因素及其获得支持的途径。设计/方法/方法采用了解释主义的定性研究方法。作者采用了多层次的数据收集策略,结合了来自16名外籍人士和16名社会行动者的访谈和问卷调查数据。使用定向内容分析法对数据进行分析。slse经历了高度的压力,而旨在减缓病毒传播的COVID-19控制措施的引入进一步加剧了这种压力。伦敦政治经济学院尤其容易受到伤害,因为它们在不稳定的职业中所占比例过高,而且工作缺乏安全感。关键的是,雇主和社会行动者的外部支持普遍缺乏,这使得lse在困难时期依靠自己的个人应对策略。早期的外派人员危机框架强调了外派人员外部支持的重要性。然而,这一框架并没有充分考虑个人应对策略,而个人应对策略对于无法获得这种外部支持的个人(例如lse)尤为重要。在此,作者提供了一个更适用于lse的修订框架。实际影响目前的做法是有问题的,需要在政府和组织层面改变政策。独创性/价值本研究提供了独特的见解,说明大流行如何影响lse本已岌岌可危的处境,并确定了在缺乏外部支持来源的情况下个人应对策略的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
How does your cultural intelligence contribute to your adjustment? Unveiling the link between cultural intelligence and cross-cultural adjustment using meta-analysis Does the overall justice climate enhance self-initiated expatriates' creativity during uncertain times ? The mediating role of cross-cultural psychological capital Dynamics of male society at work in Japanese firms: inclusion of female self-initiated expatriates in the labour force? The mediating performance role of staffing options in MNE subsidiary strategies within rapidly deteriorating environments Strategic divestment of emerging market firms: the influence of returnee managers and CEO characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1