Use of Geological Constraints in Multi-Mineral Modeling for Unconventional Reservoirs

Z. Hao, A. Nora, Mendez Freddy, Hanif Amer
{"title":"Use of Geological Constraints in Multi-Mineral Modeling for Unconventional Reservoirs","authors":"Z. Hao, A. Nora, Mendez Freddy, Hanif Amer","doi":"10.2118/194745-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Determination of mineral rock composition is an important part of unconventional reservoir formation evaluation because the mineral composition affects hydraulic fracture generation and propagation. Two types of models are usually used for mineralogy modeling—deterministic and stochastic. Both models apply mathematical representations of the logging tool responses; however, stochastic modeling has become more popular due to its consideration of random distributions in the predictor and target variables. Stochastic mineralogy modeling algorithms usually produce solutions by minimizing a function reflecting the differences between the measured and modeled responses. However, due to the non-uniqueness inherent in inversion methods, the solution may not provide petrophysically meaningful results. To avoid producing compromised results, the use of geological constraints is proposed to represent the geological relations between the unknown parameters (inversion variables), leading to a more meaningful mineralogy model.\n The proposed algorithm incorporates probability functions to generate mineralogical solutions representing geologically and petrophysically sound results. The weight assigned to the penalties in the cost function depends on the probability function assigned to the constraints. Two models are presented using the proposed algorithm: a pyrite-anhydrite constraint based on the iron and sulfur ratio, and a K-feldspar-albite constraint based on the thorium and potassium ratio.\n Data sets from several different shale plays, from across North America, are processed using the proposed algorithm. The mineral sets are complex and vary from one play to another. The results show excellent agreement with the available core X-ray diffraction measurements. The study demonstrates that the proposed constraints provide an effective improvement, in integrated formation evaluation, especially in unconventional reservoirs with highly complex mineralogy.","PeriodicalId":11321,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194745-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Determination of mineral rock composition is an important part of unconventional reservoir formation evaluation because the mineral composition affects hydraulic fracture generation and propagation. Two types of models are usually used for mineralogy modeling—deterministic and stochastic. Both models apply mathematical representations of the logging tool responses; however, stochastic modeling has become more popular due to its consideration of random distributions in the predictor and target variables. Stochastic mineralogy modeling algorithms usually produce solutions by minimizing a function reflecting the differences between the measured and modeled responses. However, due to the non-uniqueness inherent in inversion methods, the solution may not provide petrophysically meaningful results. To avoid producing compromised results, the use of geological constraints is proposed to represent the geological relations between the unknown parameters (inversion variables), leading to a more meaningful mineralogy model. The proposed algorithm incorporates probability functions to generate mineralogical solutions representing geologically and petrophysically sound results. The weight assigned to the penalties in the cost function depends on the probability function assigned to the constraints. Two models are presented using the proposed algorithm: a pyrite-anhydrite constraint based on the iron and sulfur ratio, and a K-feldspar-albite constraint based on the thorium and potassium ratio. Data sets from several different shale plays, from across North America, are processed using the proposed algorithm. The mineral sets are complex and vary from one play to another. The results show excellent agreement with the available core X-ray diffraction measurements. The study demonstrates that the proposed constraints provide an effective improvement, in integrated formation evaluation, especially in unconventional reservoirs with highly complex mineralogy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地质约束在非常规储层多矿物建模中的应用
矿物岩石成分的确定是非常规储层评价的重要组成部分,因为矿物成分影响水力裂缝的产生和扩展。矿物学建模通常采用两种模型——确定性模型和随机模型。两种模型都应用了测井工具响应的数学表示;然而,随机建模由于考虑了预测变量和目标变量的随机分布而变得越来越流行。随机矿物学建模算法通常通过最小化反映测量和模拟响应之间差异的函数来产生解决方案。然而,由于反演方法固有的非唯一性,该解决方案可能无法提供有岩石物理意义的结果。为了避免产生折衷的结果,建议使用地质约束来表示未知参数(反演变量)之间的地质关系,从而产生更有意义的矿物学模型。所提出的算法结合概率函数来生成代表地质和岩石物理结果的矿物学解。代价函数中惩罚的权重取决于约束的概率函数。利用该算法提出了两个模型:基于铁硫比的黄铁矿-硬石膏约束模型和基于钍钾比的钾长石-钠长石约束模型。来自北美几个不同页岩区的数据集使用所提出的算法进行处理。矿物集是复杂的,从一个到另一个变化。结果与现有的岩心x射线衍射测量结果非常吻合。研究表明,所提出的约束条件对地层综合评价,特别是对矿物学高度复杂的非常规储层,提供了有效的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laser Gun: The Next Perforation Technology High-Order Accurate Method for Solving the Anisotropic Eikonal Equation Recognizing Abnormal Shock Signatures During Drilling with Help of Machine Learning Optimizing Field Scale Polymer Development in Strong Aquifer Fields in the South of the Sultanate of Oman Experimental Study to Estimate CO2 Solubility in a High Pressure High Temperature HPHT Reservoir Carbonate Aquifer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1