{"title":"Terra incognita of vitality problem: Open issues. Part 1","authors":"V. Tolochek","doi":"10.18500/2304-9790-2021-10-2-108-117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increase of uncertainty, instability, complexity, ambiguity of the dynamics of the condition of social subjects are among the issues that make vitality problem topical. This results in higher standards for adaptation mechanisms of an individual and social groups (families, work groups, sports, management, project teams) and greater importance of socio-psychological and psychological resources of a person. Not all spontaneously formed adaptation mechanisms of individual and group subjects are adequate for real-life situations, not all of them are developed when it is necessary and change when the goals and requirements of the environment change. The purpose of the study is to conduct research of human vitality under uncertainty conditions; the object of the study is: social and psychological mechanisms and human vitality resources; methods include: historical and theoretical analysis, analysis of empirical research results. Hypothesis: The first stage is maintaining the vitality of an individual and social groups via formation of prosocial mechanisms of behavior according to a model (prototype). The following development stages of vitality involve forming adaptation mechanisms initiated and supported by the evolution of the “internal conditions” of the subject. We analysed the materials related to vitality study in foreign and domestic psychology from the 1960s to the present: historically emerging approaches (five “waves”), subject and tasks, mechanisms and types of human adaptation to the physical and social environment. It is stated that, within the boundar ies of historically formed paradigms, two human states are considered – “below the norm” and “norms” of social, psychological, physical functioning, characteristics of which are described by the concepts of “improvement”, “positive adaptation”, “preservation”, “back to normal”, “optimal condition”, “achieving a good result”; vitality is viewed as the achievement and maintenance of “social homeostasis” by a person, with the focus on the prosocial behavior models of other people, who are reproducing such models. Climbing the heights of physical and spiritual maturity, reaching a higher level of social functioning, the effects of positive changes in survivors of traumatic events remain unexplored, and retain the status of terra incognita.","PeriodicalId":34017,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta Novaia seriia Seriia Akmeologiia obrazovaniia Psikhologiia razvitiia","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta Novaia seriia Seriia Akmeologiia obrazovaniia Psikhologiia razvitiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2021-10-2-108-117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increase of uncertainty, instability, complexity, ambiguity of the dynamics of the condition of social subjects are among the issues that make vitality problem topical. This results in higher standards for adaptation mechanisms of an individual and social groups (families, work groups, sports, management, project teams) and greater importance of socio-psychological and psychological resources of a person. Not all spontaneously formed adaptation mechanisms of individual and group subjects are adequate for real-life situations, not all of them are developed when it is necessary and change when the goals and requirements of the environment change. The purpose of the study is to conduct research of human vitality under uncertainty conditions; the object of the study is: social and psychological mechanisms and human vitality resources; methods include: historical and theoretical analysis, analysis of empirical research results. Hypothesis: The first stage is maintaining the vitality of an individual and social groups via formation of prosocial mechanisms of behavior according to a model (prototype). The following development stages of vitality involve forming adaptation mechanisms initiated and supported by the evolution of the “internal conditions” of the subject. We analysed the materials related to vitality study in foreign and domestic psychology from the 1960s to the present: historically emerging approaches (five “waves”), subject and tasks, mechanisms and types of human adaptation to the physical and social environment. It is stated that, within the boundar ies of historically formed paradigms, two human states are considered – “below the norm” and “norms” of social, psychological, physical functioning, characteristics of which are described by the concepts of “improvement”, “positive adaptation”, “preservation”, “back to normal”, “optimal condition”, “achieving a good result”; vitality is viewed as the achievement and maintenance of “social homeostasis” by a person, with the focus on the prosocial behavior models of other people, who are reproducing such models. Climbing the heights of physical and spiritual maturity, reaching a higher level of social functioning, the effects of positive changes in survivors of traumatic events remain unexplored, and retain the status of terra incognita.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活力问题的未知领域:开放性问题。第1部分
社会主体状况动态的不确定性、不稳定性、复杂性和模糊性的增加是使活力问题成为热门话题的问题之一。这导致对个人和社会群体(家庭、工作团体、体育、管理、项目团队)适应机制的更高标准,以及个人的社会心理和心理资源的更大重要性。个体和群体主体自发形成的适应机制并不是都适合于现实生活情境,也不是所有的适应机制都是在必要时发展起来的,也不是所有的适应机制都是在环境目标和要求发生变化时发生变化的。本研究的目的是对不确定条件下的人类活力进行研究;研究对象是:社会心理机制与人的生命力资源;方法包括:历史与理论分析、实证研究结果分析。假设:第一阶段是根据模型(原型)通过形成亲社会行为机制来维持个人和社会群体的活力。生命力的以下几个发展阶段涉及主体“内在条件”演变所引发和支持的适应机制的形成。我们分析了20世纪60年代至今国内外心理学中与生命力研究相关的材料:历史上新兴的方法(五个“浪潮”)、主体和任务、人类对自然环境和社会环境的适应机制和类型。在历史上形成的范式范围内,考虑了两种人类状态——社会、心理和身体功能的“低于规范”和“规范”,其特征用“改善”、“积极适应”、“保存”、“恢复正常”、“最佳状态”、“取得良好结果”等概念来描述;活力被视为一个人对“社会稳态”的实现和维持,关注的是其他人的亲社会行为模式,而其他人正在复制这种模式。攀登身体和精神成熟的高度,达到更高的社会功能水平,创伤事件幸存者的积极变化的影响仍未得到探索,并保留了未知领域的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
46 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploiting the potential of artificial intelligence techniques in FLT Time perspective of forced migrants with different types of socio-psychological adaptation The phenomenon of parenting stress: A review of foreign concepts On preparing future teachers for personal development training Self-assessment of academic achievements in the examination situation and personality traits of students of the youth age period
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1