Does the early bird move the polls?: the use of the social media tool 'Twitter' by U.S. politicians and its impact on public opinion

Sounman Hong, Daniel Nadler
{"title":"Does the early bird move the polls?: the use of the social media tool 'Twitter' by U.S. politicians and its impact on public opinion","authors":"Sounman Hong, Daniel Nadler","doi":"10.1145/2037556.2037583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media tools such as Twitter and Facebook have been hailed as politically transformative communications technologies, on the level of previous politically significant technological innovations, such as radio and television. In this paper we estimate the impact of the use of the social media tool 'Twitter' by American politicians on changes in public opinion of those politicians over time, and we find little evidence that the political use of Twitter has eitther a positive or negative impact on public opinion. We run simple regressions of changes in widely used U. S. public opinion polls, estimating the association between favorable impressions of selected politicians and the social media usage levels (number of 'Tweets') of those politicians. In order to get a reliable estimate, we ran the same regressions for public opinion polls conducted by three different companies (CNN/Opinion Research, Gallup, and ABC/Washington Post) and we find that the estimated coefficients are not significant for any of the tested opinion polls.","PeriodicalId":93488,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Digital Government Research. International Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"82","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Digital Government Research. International Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82

Abstract

Social media tools such as Twitter and Facebook have been hailed as politically transformative communications technologies, on the level of previous politically significant technological innovations, such as radio and television. In this paper we estimate the impact of the use of the social media tool 'Twitter' by American politicians on changes in public opinion of those politicians over time, and we find little evidence that the political use of Twitter has eitther a positive or negative impact on public opinion. We run simple regressions of changes in widely used U. S. public opinion polls, estimating the association between favorable impressions of selected politicians and the social media usage levels (number of 'Tweets') of those politicians. In order to get a reliable estimate, we ran the same regressions for public opinion polls conducted by three different companies (CNN/Opinion Research, Gallup, and ABC/Washington Post) and we find that the estimated coefficients are not significant for any of the tested opinion polls.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早起的鸟儿会影响投票吗?:美国政客使用社交媒体工具“推特”及其对公众舆论的影响
Twitter和Facebook等社交媒体工具被誉为具有政治变革意义的通信技术,其程度与广播和电视等此前具有重大政治意义的技术创新相当。在本文中,我们估计了美国政治家使用社交媒体工具“Twitter”对这些政治家的公众舆论变化的影响,我们发现很少有证据表明Twitter的政治使用对公众舆论有积极或消极的影响。我们对广泛使用的美国民意调查的变化进行了简单的回归,估计了选定政治家的有利印象与这些政治家的社交媒体使用水平(“推文”的数量)之间的关系。为了得到一个可靠的估计,我们对三家不同的公司(CNN/ opinion Research, Gallup和ABC/Washington Post)进行的民意调查进行了相同的回归,我们发现估计的系数对于任何被测试的民意调查都不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Misinformation Threat: A Techno-Governance Approach for Curbing the Fake News of Tomorrow Book Review: Recoding America- Why Government is Failing in the Digital Age and How we can Do Better Challenges in AI-supported process analysis in the Italian judicial system: what after digitalization? PLUS: A Semi-automated Pipeline for Fraud Detection in Public Bids How Does the Citizen's Education Level Affect Their Internet Rights Protection Willingness? ——The Parallel Intermediary Effect of Digital Information Acquisition Ability and Utilization Ability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1