Stent Use in Emergency Treatment of Malignant Colonic Obstruction

Y. Çelik, O. Erbil
{"title":"Stent Use in Emergency Treatment of Malignant Colonic Obstruction","authors":"Y. Çelik, O. Erbil","doi":"10.5455/umj.20190510021841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In previous studies, the outcome of stent use in malignant colonic obstruction patients widely varies. We aim to present the outcome of our patients who have undergone colonic stenting in malignant colonic obstruction as a bridge or conservative therapy in line with the literature. Materials and Method: We have retrospectively reviewed patient records in surgical endoscopy clinic of our hospital. The subjects were patients who had a diagnosis of colon malignancy between 2012-2018 and had undergone a self-expandable stent. Stenting was done as a bridge to surgery in resectable colorectal tumors or for palliation in colonic obstructions due to inoperable colorectal malign disease. Clinical success was defined as resolution of obstructive symptoms and immediate decompression of the bowels proven by the passage of stool and gas in 24 hr. Results: Twenty patients were included in the study. 14 (70%) patients were male, and 6 (30%) female, mean age was 61.4±22.6 years. Right colon 1 (5%), hepatic flexure 5 (25%), splenic flexure 1 (5%), sigmoid colon 7(35%), recto-sigmoid 2 (10%), upper rectum 4 (20%) stenting was performed in terms of location. In 11 of the patients (55%), the tumor was considered resectable. After the emergency condition of the patients was improved by stenting, they were ready for elective curative surgery. In nine (45%) patients, the tumor was unresectable. In these patients, stenting was ensued by oncologic follow-up. Stent migration after the procedure 3 (15%), stent remaining at distal during the procedure 2 (10%), re-obstruction after the procedure due to tumor invasion 2 (10%), inadequate expansion of the stent 1(5%) and perforation 1 (5%) were observed in patients. Conclusion: Stenting as a bridge or conservative therapy in malignant colonic obstruction by skilled surgeon increases success rates of one-stage operation significantly and increases the quality of life by decreasing the rates of a permanent stoma and wound infections.","PeriodicalId":23051,"journal":{"name":"THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/umj.20190510021841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In previous studies, the outcome of stent use in malignant colonic obstruction patients widely varies. We aim to present the outcome of our patients who have undergone colonic stenting in malignant colonic obstruction as a bridge or conservative therapy in line with the literature. Materials and Method: We have retrospectively reviewed patient records in surgical endoscopy clinic of our hospital. The subjects were patients who had a diagnosis of colon malignancy between 2012-2018 and had undergone a self-expandable stent. Stenting was done as a bridge to surgery in resectable colorectal tumors or for palliation in colonic obstructions due to inoperable colorectal malign disease. Clinical success was defined as resolution of obstructive symptoms and immediate decompression of the bowels proven by the passage of stool and gas in 24 hr. Results: Twenty patients were included in the study. 14 (70%) patients were male, and 6 (30%) female, mean age was 61.4±22.6 years. Right colon 1 (5%), hepatic flexure 5 (25%), splenic flexure 1 (5%), sigmoid colon 7(35%), recto-sigmoid 2 (10%), upper rectum 4 (20%) stenting was performed in terms of location. In 11 of the patients (55%), the tumor was considered resectable. After the emergency condition of the patients was improved by stenting, they were ready for elective curative surgery. In nine (45%) patients, the tumor was unresectable. In these patients, stenting was ensued by oncologic follow-up. Stent migration after the procedure 3 (15%), stent remaining at distal during the procedure 2 (10%), re-obstruction after the procedure due to tumor invasion 2 (10%), inadequate expansion of the stent 1(5%) and perforation 1 (5%) were observed in patients. Conclusion: Stenting as a bridge or conservative therapy in malignant colonic obstruction by skilled surgeon increases success rates of one-stage operation significantly and increases the quality of life by decreasing the rates of a permanent stoma and wound infections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支架在恶性结肠梗阻急诊治疗中的应用
背景:在以往的研究中,恶性结肠梗阻患者使用支架的结果差异很大。我们的目的是根据文献,介绍我们的恶性结肠梗阻患者接受结肠支架置入术作为桥梁或保守治疗的结果。材料与方法:回顾性分析我院外科内窥镜门诊的病例资料。研究对象是2012-2018年间被诊断为结肠恶性肿瘤并接受了自膨胀支架的患者。支架植入术是可切除的结直肠肿瘤手术的桥梁,或缓解因无法手术的结直肠恶性疾病引起的结肠阻塞。临床成功的定义是梗阻性症状的缓解和24小时内大便和气体的通过证明肠道的立即减压。结果:20例患者纳入研究。男性14例(70%),女性6例(30%),平均年龄61.4±22.6岁。右结肠1(5%),肝曲5(25%),脾曲1(5%),乙状结肠7(35%),直肠-乙状结肠2(10%),上直肠4(20%)。11例患者(55%)认为肿瘤可切除。经支架置入术后,患者的紧急情况得到改善,准备择期进行治疗性手术。在9例(45%)患者中,肿瘤无法切除。在这些患者中,支架植入后进行肿瘤随访。患者观察到手术3后支架移位(15%),手术2时支架保留在远端(10%),手术后因肿瘤侵袭再次阻塞(10%),支架扩张不足(5%)和穿孔(5%)。结论:熟练的外科医生将支架置入术作为恶性结肠梗阻的桥梁或保守治疗,可显著提高一期手术的成功率,并通过降低永久性造口和伤口感染的发生率,提高生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Dietary Protein Quality on Short-Term Satiety and Daily Energy Intake An Unusual Mid-Line Nasal Mass in a Child: A Case Report The Effect of Midazolam and Magnesium Sulfate on Preoperative Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty Operation The Relationship of Endocan to Disease Severity in Psoriasis: Effect of Endocan on VGEF, CXCL12 and NGF Levels Profoundal Effects of Microcystin-LR Induced Cardiotoxicity in Mammals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1