‘We all have friends like that’

IF 1 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-15 DOI:10.1558/CAM.39254
L. Roper, N. Sturman
{"title":"‘We all have friends like that’","authors":"L. Roper, N. Sturman","doi":"10.1558/CAM.39254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical professionals are in an ideal position to mediate between the benefits and harms of internet-sourced medical information, but there is reluctance by patients to discuss with their doctors information found online. This is the first study undertaken in a rural Australian context, where service limitations mean patients’ use of the internet may be especially important. Patients attending general practice clinics (n = 33) were interviewed to discover how they used the internet for health information and how they discussed this with their doctors. Analysis used a constant comparison method, informed by grounded theory and a dramaturgical framework. Most participants used a range of tactics when discussing internet-sourced medical information, including concealment, disguise or upfront apologetic disclosures to avoid undermining the expertise of the doctor. These findings do not confirm predictions made in the past that patients’ acquisition of internet health information would alter the power dynamic of the medical consultation. Potentially, proactive, doctor-initiated inquiry about internet medical information may help to normalise patients’ internet use, allowing open discussion, so doctors can maximise benefits and reduce harms of internet health information. Further study is required to see if this will be an effective strategy and impact health outcomes.","PeriodicalId":43868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/CAM.39254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical professionals are in an ideal position to mediate between the benefits and harms of internet-sourced medical information, but there is reluctance by patients to discuss with their doctors information found online. This is the first study undertaken in a rural Australian context, where service limitations mean patients’ use of the internet may be especially important. Patients attending general practice clinics (n = 33) were interviewed to discover how they used the internet for health information and how they discussed this with their doctors. Analysis used a constant comparison method, informed by grounded theory and a dramaturgical framework. Most participants used a range of tactics when discussing internet-sourced medical information, including concealment, disguise or upfront apologetic disclosures to avoid undermining the expertise of the doctor. These findings do not confirm predictions made in the past that patients’ acquisition of internet health information would alter the power dynamic of the medical consultation. Potentially, proactive, doctor-initiated inquiry about internet medical information may help to normalise patients’ internet use, allowing open discussion, so doctors can maximise benefits and reduce harms of internet health information. Further study is required to see if this will be an effective strategy and impact health outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们都有这样的朋友。”
医疗专业人员处于一个理想的位置,可以在互联网医疗信息的利与弊之间进行调解,但患者不愿意与医生讨论在网上找到的信息。这是第一个在澳大利亚农村地区进行的研究,那里的服务限制意味着患者使用互联网可能特别重要。在全科诊所就诊的患者(n = 33)接受了采访,以了解他们如何使用互联网获取健康信息,以及他们如何与医生讨论这个问题。分析采用了不断比较的方法,以扎实的理论和戏剧框架为依据。大多数参与者在讨论来自互联网的医疗信息时采用了一系列策略,包括隐瞒、伪装或提前道歉,以避免损害医生的专业知识。这些发现并不能证实过去的预测,即患者获取互联网健康信息将改变医疗咨询的权力动态。潜在地,医生主动发起的关于互联网医疗信息的询问可能有助于规范患者的互联网使用,允许公开讨论,因此医生可以最大化互联网健康信息的利益并减少危害。需要进一步研究,以确定这是否将是一项有效的战略并影响健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine
Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The Journal is a quarterly, international, peer-reviewed journal that acts as a vehicle for the interchange of information and ideas in the production, manipulation, storage and transport of images for medical education, records and research.
期刊最新文献
Comparative study of AR infographic posters vs. offline videos for micro-video delivery in cardiology education. Visualising the art of medicine: a showcase of creative endeavour from Bristol Medical School, UK. The origin of the popular iconic heart symbol: fiction or facts? Randomised controlled trial: role of virtual interactive 3-dimensional models in anatomical and medical education. Multisensory medical illustrations of Buruli ulcer for improved disease detection, help seeking behaviour and adherence to treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1