Stability and dynamics of the fractured zygomaticomaxillary complex fixed using non-resorbable and resorbable 2- and 3-point miniplates, under physiological and maximal occlusal loads: a finite element analysis

IF 0.2 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Trauma monthly Pub Date : 2020-05-29 DOI:10.30491/TM.2020.214430.1046
Farzin Sarkarat, M. Khosravi, R. Kahali, Amirparham Pirhadi Rad, S. Ebrahimi, V. Rakhshan
{"title":"Stability and dynamics of the fractured zygomaticomaxillary complex fixed using non-resorbable and resorbable 2- and 3-point miniplates, under physiological and maximal occlusal loads: a finite element analysis","authors":"Farzin Sarkarat, M. Khosravi, R. Kahali, Amirparham Pirhadi Rad, S. Ebrahimi, V. Rakhshan","doi":"10.30491/TM.2020.214430.1046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Given that zygoma fractures are the second most common facial trauma, knowledge of their treatments is of clinical value. Among these are fixations methods, which despite their importance are neglected in many aspects. Therefore, for the first time in the literature, the present finite element analysis evaluated displacements and dynamics of the zygoma fixed using four 2- and 3-point resorbable and four non-resorbable plates under normal and maximal mastication loads. \nMethods: A maxillofacial CT scan of a man with linear fractures without severe displacements was used to model the zygoma and its adjacent bones. Seven combinations of resorbable and seven combinations of non-resorbable mini-plates 2mm thick were fixed on the zygoma (orbital rim, zygomaticomaxillary buttress [ZMB], and frontozygomatic [FZ]) using 6mm miniscrews. ZMB was fixed using an L-shaped 4-hole plate. The infraorbital rim was fixed with a curved 5-hole miniplate. The FZ suture area was fixed with a 4-hole miniplate. The model underwent 150N and 750N loads. Minimum and maximum displacements, rotational displacements, stresses, and strains of the zygoma models were calculated. \nResults: Non-resorbable fixation methods can yield much smaller stresses, strains, and displacements compared to resorbable fixations. Also the parameters were much smaller under the 150N load compared to the 750N load. The worst results belonged to the fixation of Rim and ZMB and the best results belonged to the fixation of ZMB-Rim, and especially FZ-ZMB, Rim-FZ, and FZ-ZMB-Rim. \nConclusions: In patients with heavy masticatory forces, it is not recommended to use resorbable plates.","PeriodicalId":23249,"journal":{"name":"Trauma monthly","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma monthly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30491/TM.2020.214430.1046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Given that zygoma fractures are the second most common facial trauma, knowledge of their treatments is of clinical value. Among these are fixations methods, which despite their importance are neglected in many aspects. Therefore, for the first time in the literature, the present finite element analysis evaluated displacements and dynamics of the zygoma fixed using four 2- and 3-point resorbable and four non-resorbable plates under normal and maximal mastication loads. Methods: A maxillofacial CT scan of a man with linear fractures without severe displacements was used to model the zygoma and its adjacent bones. Seven combinations of resorbable and seven combinations of non-resorbable mini-plates 2mm thick were fixed on the zygoma (orbital rim, zygomaticomaxillary buttress [ZMB], and frontozygomatic [FZ]) using 6mm miniscrews. ZMB was fixed using an L-shaped 4-hole plate. The infraorbital rim was fixed with a curved 5-hole miniplate. The FZ suture area was fixed with a 4-hole miniplate. The model underwent 150N and 750N loads. Minimum and maximum displacements, rotational displacements, stresses, and strains of the zygoma models were calculated. Results: Non-resorbable fixation methods can yield much smaller stresses, strains, and displacements compared to resorbable fixations. Also the parameters were much smaller under the 150N load compared to the 750N load. The worst results belonged to the fixation of Rim and ZMB and the best results belonged to the fixation of ZMB-Rim, and especially FZ-ZMB, Rim-FZ, and FZ-ZMB-Rim. Conclusions: In patients with heavy masticatory forces, it is not recommended to use resorbable plates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在生理和最大咬合负荷下,使用不可吸收和可吸收的2点和3点微型钢板固定骨折颧颌复合体的稳定性和动力学:有限元分析
简介:鉴于颧骨骨折是第二常见的面部创伤,了解其治疗方法具有临床价值。其中有固定方法,尽管它很重要,但在很多方面却被忽视了。因此,本文首次在文献中采用4块2点和3点可吸收钢板和4块不可吸收钢板对正常和最大咀嚼负荷下固定颧骨的位移和动力学进行了有限元分析。方法:颌面部CT扫描的线性骨折没有严重移位的人被用来模拟颧骨及其邻近的骨头。将7组可吸收和7组不可吸收的2mm厚微型钢板用6mm微型螺钉固定在颧骨(眶缘、颧腋扶壁[ZMB]和额颧骨[FZ])上。使用l型4孔板固定ZMB。用弯曲的5孔微型钢板固定眶下缘。用4孔微型钢板固定FZ缝合区。模型承受150N和750N载荷。计算颧骨模型的最小和最大位移、旋转位移、应力和应变。结果:与可吸收固定相比,不可吸收固定方法产生的应力、应变和位移要小得多。此外,与750N负载相比,150N负载下的参数要小得多。结果以Rim和ZMB固定效果最差,ZMB-Rim固定效果最好,尤其是FZ-ZMB、Rim- fz和FZ-ZMB-Rim固定效果最好。结论:咀嚼力大的患者不建议使用可吸收板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trauma monthly
Trauma monthly EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Dimensions of the Anterior Column of the Acetabulum with Imaging Criteria in Patients with Surgical Acetabular Fractures Mortality Prediction in Multiple Trauma Patients Using GAP, RTS and NTS Models The effect of Pregabalin on morphine consumption, sleep, mood and ability to change position after colorectal cancer surgery Titanium Elastic Nailing System, An Effective Way Of Pediatric Forearm Fracture Management Diagnostic Salivary Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1