Experiences of peer workers and mental health service users with a peer support intervention: applying and critiquing a behaviour change techniques taxonomy

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Advances in Mental Health Pub Date : 2022-01-06 DOI:10.1080/18387357.2021.2012088
J. Marks, N. Sriskandarajah, M. Aurélio, S. Gillard, M. Rinaldi, R. Foster, M. Ussher
{"title":"Experiences of peer workers and mental health service users with a peer support intervention: applying and critiquing a behaviour change techniques taxonomy","authors":"J. Marks, N. Sriskandarajah, M. Aurélio, S. Gillard, M. Rinaldi, R. Foster, M. Ussher","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2021.2012088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective There is growing evidence for the benefits of peer support in mental health services. Less is known about the specific mechanisms whereby peer support brings about change. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of adults using mental health services and peer workers to investigate whether the contents of an intentionally provided one-to-one peer support intervention can be adequately described using a standard taxonomy of behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Method This qualitative comparative case study involved semi-structured interviews with 11 peer workers and 10 people they supported, in 2017–2018. They participated in a randomised controlled trial of a peer support intervention. Data were coded using both an analytical framework, derived from Michie and colleague’s taxonomy of BCTs, and inductive thematic analysis. Results The findings revealed that the intervention included BCTs from all 16 BCT groupings in the taxonomy, with the emphasis on the groupings of ‘social support’, ‘comparison of behaviour’, ‘comparison of outcomes’, ‘regulation’ ‘shaping knowledge’, ‘identity’ and ‘covert learning’. Thematic analysis revealed a new group, ‘relational aspects’, consisting of five new BCTs: sharing of the peer worker’s experiential knowledge; promoting reciprocity, autonomy, and confidentiality; and validation of a safe and trusting relationship. Discussion A standard taxonomy of BCTs was shown to be broadly applicable to describing the contents of an intentional one-to-one peer support intervention for adults using mental health services. The taxonomy may need to be extended to consider additional BCTs related to encouraging the therapeutic relationship.","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2021.2012088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective There is growing evidence for the benefits of peer support in mental health services. Less is known about the specific mechanisms whereby peer support brings about change. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of adults using mental health services and peer workers to investigate whether the contents of an intentionally provided one-to-one peer support intervention can be adequately described using a standard taxonomy of behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Method This qualitative comparative case study involved semi-structured interviews with 11 peer workers and 10 people they supported, in 2017–2018. They participated in a randomised controlled trial of a peer support intervention. Data were coded using both an analytical framework, derived from Michie and colleague’s taxonomy of BCTs, and inductive thematic analysis. Results The findings revealed that the intervention included BCTs from all 16 BCT groupings in the taxonomy, with the emphasis on the groupings of ‘social support’, ‘comparison of behaviour’, ‘comparison of outcomes’, ‘regulation’ ‘shaping knowledge’, ‘identity’ and ‘covert learning’. Thematic analysis revealed a new group, ‘relational aspects’, consisting of five new BCTs: sharing of the peer worker’s experiential knowledge; promoting reciprocity, autonomy, and confidentiality; and validation of a safe and trusting relationship. Discussion A standard taxonomy of BCTs was shown to be broadly applicable to describing the contents of an intentional one-to-one peer support intervention for adults using mental health services. The taxonomy may need to be extended to consider additional BCTs related to encouraging the therapeutic relationship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同伴工作者和精神卫生服务使用者在同伴支持干预方面的经验:行为改变技术分类法的应用和批评
【摘要】目的越来越多的证据表明同伴支持在精神卫生服务中的益处。关于同伴支持带来改变的具体机制,我们所知甚少。本研究的目的是探讨成年人使用心理健康服务和同伴工作者的经验,以调查是否可以使用行为改变技术(bct)的标准分类充分描述有意提供的一对一同伴支持干预的内容。方法采用半结构化访谈的方法,对2017-2018年期间的11名同事和10名他们支持的人进行定性比较案例研究。他们参加了一项同伴支持干预的随机对照试验。使用Michie及其同事的bct分类法衍生的分析框架和归纳主题分析对数据进行编码。结果研究结果表明,干预包括分类中所有16个BCT组的BCT,重点是“社会支持”、“行为比较”、“结果比较”、“调节”、“塑造知识”、“身份”和“隐蔽学习”组。专题分析揭示了一个新的组,“关系方面”,由五个新的btc组成:分享同事的经验知识;促进互惠、自治和保密;以及一段安全信任关系的验证。bct的标准分类被证明广泛适用于描述对使用心理健康服务的成年人进行有意的一对一同伴支持干预的内容。该分类可能需要扩展,以考虑与促进治疗关系相关的其他bct。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Is non-clinical, personal use of binaural beats audio an effective stress-management strategy? A systematic review of randomised control trials A qualitative assessment of community needs and views about discussing suicide The #BlueWhaleChallenge and presence of suicidal ideations on Polish-language Twitter Are professional counsellors and psychotherapists prepared to make a greater contribution to the Australian mental health workforce? A comparison of training content and mental health standards Ignored sufferers: a phenomenological inquiry into the lived experiences of postpartum depression among men
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1