Abstract LB222: Performance of polygenic risk scores for GI cancer prediction in an academic biobank

Louise Wang, H. Desai, A. Le, R. Hausler, S. Verma, A. Verma, R. Judy, A. Doucette, P. Gabriel, S. Damrauer, M. Ritchie, Daniel Rader, R. Kember, K. Maxwell
{"title":"Abstract LB222: Performance of polygenic risk scores for GI cancer prediction in an academic biobank","authors":"Louise Wang, H. Desai, A. Le, R. Hausler, S. Verma, A. Verma, R. Judy, A. Doucette, P. Gabriel, S. Damrauer, M. Ritchie, Daniel Rader, R. Kember, K. Maxwell","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-LB222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Genome wide association studies (GWAS) have identified hundreds of common, low risk genetic variants significantly associated with a number of gastrointestinal cancers, but the predictive ability of individual variants or a polygenic risk score (PRS) derived from multiple variants is still unclear especially among minorities. Specific Aims: To evaluate the discriminatory ability of PRS models to differentiate cancer cases vs. controls in patients of European (EUR) and African (AFR) ancestry in an academic biobank. Methods: We identified 445 cases of esophageal, colon, and pancreatic cancers and 12,565 cancer-free controls. Genome-wide significant variants were selected for each of the cancers, and Plink 1.9 was used to generate a PRS, an effect size weighted sum of specific cancer associated alleles for each population. To determine the discriminatory ability of PRS, we performed multivariate logistic regressions in R controlling for age, sex, and the first 10 principal components. Results: There were 285 cases of colon (48.4% AFR), 63 cases of esophageal (34.9% AFR), and 97 cases of pancreatic cancer (51.5% AFR) vs. 12,565 controls (48.5% AFR). Among the EUR individuals, the PRScolon was significantly associated with colon cancer [OR 1.25 (1.06-4.48, p=0.007)] (Table 1). The discriminatory ability of the model comprised of age, gender and principal components was 0.680-0.732 in the respective cancer cancers and the AUC minimally increased to 0.688-0.747 after inclusion of the PRS in the model. Among AFR individuals, the discriminatory ability was overall higher in the full model (AUC 0.755-0.812) but PRS increased the AUC less in AFR vs. EUR. Conclusion: Colon, esophageal, and pancreatic cancer PRS models have a moderate discriminatory ability to identify cases. However, the individual contribution of PRS to the model was small. Further studies are needed to determine additional genetic predictors of cancer risk and how best to incorporate PRS into gastrointestinal cancer risk prediction models. Citation Format: Louise Wang, Heena Desai, Anh Le, Ryan Hausler, Shefali Verma, Anurag Verma, Renae Judy, Abigail Doucette, Peter Gabriel, Scott Damrauer, Marylyn Ritchie, Daniel Rader, Rachel Kember, Kara Maxwell. Performance of polygenic risk scores for GI cancer prediction in an academic biobank [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB222.","PeriodicalId":20290,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Research","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-LB222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Genome wide association studies (GWAS) have identified hundreds of common, low risk genetic variants significantly associated with a number of gastrointestinal cancers, but the predictive ability of individual variants or a polygenic risk score (PRS) derived from multiple variants is still unclear especially among minorities. Specific Aims: To evaluate the discriminatory ability of PRS models to differentiate cancer cases vs. controls in patients of European (EUR) and African (AFR) ancestry in an academic biobank. Methods: We identified 445 cases of esophageal, colon, and pancreatic cancers and 12,565 cancer-free controls. Genome-wide significant variants were selected for each of the cancers, and Plink 1.9 was used to generate a PRS, an effect size weighted sum of specific cancer associated alleles for each population. To determine the discriminatory ability of PRS, we performed multivariate logistic regressions in R controlling for age, sex, and the first 10 principal components. Results: There were 285 cases of colon (48.4% AFR), 63 cases of esophageal (34.9% AFR), and 97 cases of pancreatic cancer (51.5% AFR) vs. 12,565 controls (48.5% AFR). Among the EUR individuals, the PRScolon was significantly associated with colon cancer [OR 1.25 (1.06-4.48, p=0.007)] (Table 1). The discriminatory ability of the model comprised of age, gender and principal components was 0.680-0.732 in the respective cancer cancers and the AUC minimally increased to 0.688-0.747 after inclusion of the PRS in the model. Among AFR individuals, the discriminatory ability was overall higher in the full model (AUC 0.755-0.812) but PRS increased the AUC less in AFR vs. EUR. Conclusion: Colon, esophageal, and pancreatic cancer PRS models have a moderate discriminatory ability to identify cases. However, the individual contribution of PRS to the model was small. Further studies are needed to determine additional genetic predictors of cancer risk and how best to incorporate PRS into gastrointestinal cancer risk prediction models. Citation Format: Louise Wang, Heena Desai, Anh Le, Ryan Hausler, Shefali Verma, Anurag Verma, Renae Judy, Abigail Doucette, Peter Gabriel, Scott Damrauer, Marylyn Ritchie, Daniel Rader, Rachel Kember, Kara Maxwell. Performance of polygenic risk scores for GI cancer prediction in an academic biobank [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB222.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摘要LB222:多基因风险评分在学术生物库中用于胃肠道癌症预测的性能
背景:全基因组关联研究(GWAS)已经确定了数百种常见的低风险遗传变异与许多胃肠道癌症显著相关,但个体变异或多基因风险评分(PRS)的预测能力仍不清楚,特别是在少数民族中。具体目的:评估PRS模型在学术生物库中区分欧洲(EUR)和非洲(AFR)血统患者的癌症病例与对照组的区别能力。方法:我们确定了445例食管癌、结肠癌和胰腺癌以及12565例无癌对照。为每种癌症选择全基因组显著变异,并使用Plink 1.9生成PRS,即每个人群的特定癌症相关等位基因的效应大小加权总和。为了确定PRS的区分能力,我们对年龄、性别和前10个主成分进行了多变量logistic回归。结果:结肠癌285例(48.4%),食管癌63例(34.9%),胰腺癌97例(51.5%),对照组12565例(48.5%)。在EUR个体中,PRScolon与结肠癌显著相关[OR 1.25 (1.06-4.48, p=0.007)](表1)。由年龄、性别和主成分组成的模型在各自癌症中的区分能力为0.680-0.732,将PRS纳入模型后,AUC最低增加到0.688-0.747。在AFR个体中,在完整模型中,歧视能力总体上更高(AUC 0.755-0.812),但与欧元相比,PRS对AFR个体的AUC增加较少。结论:结肠癌、食管癌和胰腺癌PRS模型具有中等的鉴别能力。然而,PRS对模型的个人贡献很小。需要进一步的研究来确定癌症风险的其他遗传预测因子,以及如何最好地将PRS纳入胃肠道癌症风险预测模型。引文格式:Louise Wang, Heena Desai, Anh Le, Ryan Hausler, Shefali Verma, Anurag Verma, Renae Judy, Abigail Doucette, Peter Gabriel, Scott Damrauer, marilyn Ritchie, Daniel Rader, Rachel Kember, Kara Maxwell。多基因风险评分在学术生物库中预测胃肠道癌症的表现[摘要]。见:美国癌症研究协会2021年年会论文集;2021年4月10日至15日和5月17日至21日。费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2021;81(13 -增刊):摘要nr LB222。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract LB226: Maternal microbiome protects host against clonal de novo transformation, early onset systemic metastasis, and sudden death Abstract 2525: Low frequency TP53 mutations in airway epithelial cells serve as lung cancer risk biomarker Abstract 2540: Belief in research, religious coping, and willingness to participate in clinical trials among African Americans with hematologic malignancies: a pilot study Abstract 2560: Plasticity-related signaling pathways in the medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus as potential targets of the antidepressant vortioxetine in reversing cognitive impairments after androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer Abstract 2596: Stage-specific inhibition of NNK-induced lung carcinogenesis by 1,4-phenylenebis(methylene)seleno-aspirin (p-XS-Asp)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1