Study of Humoral Immunity against Coronavirus Infection COVID-19 in Vaccinated Individuals with Vaccines Available in the Republic of Belarus (Sputnik V (Gam-COVID-Vac), RF and Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV), PRC)

K. Korsak, I. Stoma, E. Voropaev, O. Osipkina, A. A. Kovalev
{"title":"Study of Humoral Immunity against Coronavirus Infection COVID-19 in Vaccinated Individuals with Vaccines Available in the Republic of Belarus (Sputnik V (Gam-COVID-Vac), RF and Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV), PRC)","authors":"K. Korsak, I. Stoma, E. Voropaev, O. Osipkina, A. A. Kovalev","doi":"10.31631/2073-3046-2023-22-1-28-37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. Many countries around the world are developing effective vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. The measure of the effectiveness of the vaccination process has traditionally been antibody production. The frequency and intensity of adverse reactions is also an important factor in making a decision regarding a vaccine. This study presents the results of the evaluation of the formation of humoral immunity and the occurrence of reactions in response to the administration of Sputnik V (Gam-COVID-Vac), RF, and Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV), PRC. Aim. Analyze immunogenicity and reactogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines used in the Republic of Belarus (Sputnik V and Sinopharm). Materials and methods. Evaluation of postvaccination immune response by enzyme immunoassay and differential enzyme immunoassay for class G immunoglobulins to S- and N-proteins SARS-CoV-2. Blood plasma of the study participants was used as biological material. Blood sampling was performed 3 times: immediately before the first vaccine dose, on day 42, and 6 months after the first vaccine dose. To evaluate the frequency and intensity of postvaccination reactions, study participants were questioned. Results. At 42 days after administration of both vaccines, antibody levels are rising, with a significantly higher quantitative IgG count for the Sputnik V vaccine. This trend is also observed 6 months after the first dose of both vaccines, both among those previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and those without a history of COVID-19. The comparison of Sputnik V and Sinopharm vaccine groups in terms of IgG (BAU/ml) levels to S- and N-proteins revealed a statistically significant difference in IgG levels to S-protein: the Sputnik V vaccine group had significantly higher IgG levels to S-protein than the Sinopharm vaccine group (p = 0.0000196). The incidence of adverse reactions in this study was 45%. All reactions noted were mild to moderate in severity. The most common were soreness and redness at the injection site, elevated body temperature, and a combination of several reactions. The increased body temperature after vaccination was more common among those vaccinated with the Sputnik V vaccine. Conclusion. Compared to Sinopharm, Sputnik V vaccine produces higher antibody level. Adverse reactions were observed in both vaccinated groups. However, significant statistical differences were found with regard to fever in the Sputnik V vaccine group, which occurred more frequently.","PeriodicalId":11736,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2023-22-1-28-37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance. Many countries around the world are developing effective vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. The measure of the effectiveness of the vaccination process has traditionally been antibody production. The frequency and intensity of adverse reactions is also an important factor in making a decision regarding a vaccine. This study presents the results of the evaluation of the formation of humoral immunity and the occurrence of reactions in response to the administration of Sputnik V (Gam-COVID-Vac), RF, and Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV), PRC. Aim. Analyze immunogenicity and reactogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines used in the Republic of Belarus (Sputnik V and Sinopharm). Materials and methods. Evaluation of postvaccination immune response by enzyme immunoassay and differential enzyme immunoassay for class G immunoglobulins to S- and N-proteins SARS-CoV-2. Blood plasma of the study participants was used as biological material. Blood sampling was performed 3 times: immediately before the first vaccine dose, on day 42, and 6 months after the first vaccine dose. To evaluate the frequency and intensity of postvaccination reactions, study participants were questioned. Results. At 42 days after administration of both vaccines, antibody levels are rising, with a significantly higher quantitative IgG count for the Sputnik V vaccine. This trend is also observed 6 months after the first dose of both vaccines, both among those previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and those without a history of COVID-19. The comparison of Sputnik V and Sinopharm vaccine groups in terms of IgG (BAU/ml) levels to S- and N-proteins revealed a statistically significant difference in IgG levels to S-protein: the Sputnik V vaccine group had significantly higher IgG levels to S-protein than the Sinopharm vaccine group (p = 0.0000196). The incidence of adverse reactions in this study was 45%. All reactions noted were mild to moderate in severity. The most common were soreness and redness at the injection site, elevated body temperature, and a combination of several reactions. The increased body temperature after vaccination was more common among those vaccinated with the Sputnik V vaccine. Conclusion. Compared to Sinopharm, Sputnik V vaccine produces higher antibody level. Adverse reactions were observed in both vaccinated groups. However, significant statistical differences were found with regard to fever in the Sputnik V vaccine group, which occurred more frequently.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白俄罗斯共和国(Sputnik V (Gam-COVID-Vac), RF和中华人民共和国中国医药集团公司(BBIBP-CorV))疫苗接种者对冠状病毒感染COVID-19的体液免疫研究
的相关性。世界上许多国家正在开发针对SARS-CoV-2的有效疫苗。传统上衡量疫苗接种过程有效性的标准是抗体的产生。不良反应的频率和强度也是决定是否接种疫苗的一个重要因素。本研究报告了中华人民共和国Sputnik V (Gam-COVID-Vac)、RF和中国医药集团公司(BBIBP-CorV)给药后体液免疫形成和反应发生的评估结果。的目标。分析白俄罗斯共和国(Sputnik V和中国医药集团公司)使用的COVID-19疫苗的免疫原性和反应原性。材料和方法。用酶免疫分析法和差异酶免疫分析法评价接种后G类免疫球蛋白对SARS-CoV-2 S和n蛋白的免疫应答。研究参与者的血浆被用作生物材料。采血3次:第一次疫苗接种前、第42天和第一次疫苗接种后6个月。为了评估疫苗接种后反应的频率和强度,研究参与者接受了询问。结果。在接种两种疫苗42天后,抗体水平上升,Sputnik V疫苗的IgG定量计数明显较高。在首次接种两种疫苗6个月后也观察到这一趋势,无论是在以前感染过SARS-CoV-2的人群中,还是在没有COVID-19病史的人群中。Sputnik V疫苗组与国药控股疫苗组S-和n -蛋白IgG (BAU/ml)水平比较,S-蛋白IgG水平差异有统计学意义:Sputnik V疫苗组S-蛋白IgG水平显著高于国药控股疫苗组(p = 0.0000196)。本研究不良反应发生率为45%。所有记录的反应都是轻度到中度的严重程度。最常见的是注射部位的疼痛和发红,体温升高,以及几种反应的组合。接种Sputnik V疫苗后体温升高在接种者中更为常见。结论。与国药相比,Sputnik V疫苗产生更高的抗体水平。在接种疫苗的两组中均观察到不良反应。然而,在Sputnik V疫苗组中发现了显著的统计差异,发热发生的频率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Serogroup B Protein Meningococcal Vaccines and the Formation of Immune Protection against Gonorrhea Obtaining and Characterization of Experimental Diagnostic Brucellosis Rabbit Sera for the Development of a National Standard for Brucellosis Serum New Russian Trivalent Hepatitis B Vaccine (Bubo®­-Unigep): Reactogenicity, Safety and Immunological Efficacy Bacterial Infections Transmitted by Ticks in Barnaul: Epidemiological and Epizootological Situation, Diagnostic Problems Factors Determining Adherence to Hand Antisepsis by Healthcare Workers during Pandemic Infection Spread (as exemplified by COVID­-19)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1