Policy analysis of Korea’s development cooperation with sub-Saharan Africa: a focus on fragile states

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES International Development Planning Review Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.3828/idpr.2021.23
Huck-ju Kwon, Suyeon Lee, Y. Ha
{"title":"Policy analysis of Korea’s development cooperation with sub-Saharan Africa: a focus on fragile states","authors":"Huck-ju Kwon, Suyeon Lee, Y. Ha","doi":"10.3828/idpr.2021.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIt has been ten years since the New Deal for Engagement in Fragile States was endorsed by the global community. The government of South Korea set out development initiatives to put fragile states at the top of its development agenda and substantially increased its bilateral aid to them. This study analyses the policy orientations of South Korea’s aid to fragile states by exploring the determinants of Korea’s official development assistance to forty-eight sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries over the period 2010-2019 with reference to the top ten OECD donors to SSA countries as a group. The study found that South Korea does not give special consideration to the needs of fragile states. Unfortunately, this result is not only for South Korea but for the top ten OECD donors as well. While South Korea’s aid has been responsive to post-natural disaster displacement in SSA countries, the overall results indicate that donors in general have failed to embrace their commitment to state-building and peacebuilding in the New Deal for Fragile States and the 2030 Agenda. Given that pursuing ‘development and peace’ is a collective and enduring process with shared obligations and responsibilities across countries, donors shall prioritise development efforts on countries that need most assistance.","PeriodicalId":46625,"journal":{"name":"International Development Planning Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Development Planning Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2021.23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has been ten years since the New Deal for Engagement in Fragile States was endorsed by the global community. The government of South Korea set out development initiatives to put fragile states at the top of its development agenda and substantially increased its bilateral aid to them. This study analyses the policy orientations of South Korea’s aid to fragile states by exploring the determinants of Korea’s official development assistance to forty-eight sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries over the period 2010-2019 with reference to the top ten OECD donors to SSA countries as a group. The study found that South Korea does not give special consideration to the needs of fragile states. Unfortunately, this result is not only for South Korea but for the top ten OECD donors as well. While South Korea’s aid has been responsive to post-natural disaster displacement in SSA countries, the overall results indicate that donors in general have failed to embrace their commitment to state-building and peacebuilding in the New Deal for Fragile States and the 2030 Agenda. Given that pursuing ‘development and peace’ is a collective and enduring process with shared obligations and responsibilities across countries, donors shall prioritise development efforts on countries that need most assistance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国与撒哈拉以南非洲发展合作的政策分析:以脆弱国家为重点
自《脆弱国家接触新政》获得国际社会认可以来,已经过去了十年。韩国政府制定了发展计划,将脆弱国家置于其发展议程的首位,并大幅增加了对这些国家的双边援助。本研究通过探讨韩国在2010-2019年期间向48个撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)国家提供官方发展援助的决定因素,并参考经合组织对SSA国家的十大捐助国作为一个群体,分析了韩国对脆弱国家援助的政策取向。研究发现,韩国没有特别考虑脆弱国家的需求。不幸的是,这一结果不仅适用于韩国,也适用于经合组织十大捐助国。虽然韩国的援助对南撒哈拉地区国家自然灾害后的流离失所做出了回应,但总体结果表明,捐助者总体上未能兑现他们在《脆弱国家新政》和《2030年议程》中对国家建设与和平建设的承诺。鉴于追求“发展与和平”是一个集体和持久的过程,各国有共同的义务和责任,捐助者应优先考虑最需要援助的国家的发展努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: International Development Planning Review’s editorial policy is to reflect international development planning policy and practice. This includes a focus on the physical, economic and social conditions of urban and rural populations. The journal explores current national and international policy agendas, achievements and strategies in this area, offering material of interest to its established academic and professional readership as well as to a broader critical audience.
期刊最新文献
The politics of Africa’s urban–industrialisation: authoritarian centralisation and policy integration Picture this! Vulnerable women’s perspectives on SDGs prioritisation The geography of women’s informal entrepreneurial activities in urban Zambia: place, mobility and locational decision-making Community perception of climate events as a security issue: the case of Hatiya Island, Bangladesh Development beyond 2030: more collaboration, less competition?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1